Rhaman v Minister for Immigration
[2017] FCCA 2090
•30 August 2017
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| RHAMAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2017] FCCA 2090 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – no appearance by the Applicant – appropriate matter for Court to exercise powers under r.13.03C(l)(c) – application dismissed. |
| Legislation: Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.13.03C(1)(c) Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.476 |
| Applicant: | MD ANISUR RHAMAN |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 54 of 2017 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 30 August 2017 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 30 August 2017 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 30 August 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| No appearance by or on behalf of the applicant. |
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Ms G Doyle Sparke Helmore Lawyers |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The applicant pay the first respondent’s costs fixed in the amount of $5,800.00.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 54 of 2017
| MD ANISUR RHAMAN |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a Constitutional writ within the Court’s jurisdiction under s.476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (“the Migration Act”) in respect of a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) made on 12 December 2016 affirming a decision of the delegate not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) (Subclass 573) visa.
By order of a Registrar on 27 April 2017, the matter was fixed for hearing today before the Court at 10:30am. It is now past 11:15 am and the applicant has been called and has failed to appear.
The first respondent has moved for the proceedings to be dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001. The first respondent has tendered both an email and a letter dated 23 August 2017, sent to the applicant’s email address and residential address identified on the application.
I am satisfied that the applicant was aware of the hearing date and that this is an appropriate matter in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Date: 8 September 2017
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
0