RGB

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

RGB [2023] QCAT 501

PARTIES:

In applications about matters concerning RGB

APPLICATION NOS:

GAA9605-23, GAA9607-23, GAA9608-23, GAA9609-23, GAA12852-23

MATTER TYPE:

Guardianship and administration matters for adults

DELIVERED ON:

19 December 2023

HEARING DATE:

9 November 2023

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Kanowski

ORDERS:

1.     The application for the appointment of an administrator is dismissed.

2.     The application for the appointment of a guardian is dismissed.

3.     The application for a declaration about capacity is dismissed.

4.     The tribunal declares that the enduring power of attorney made by RGB on 15 November 2006 was revoked on 20 July 2023.

5.     The application for leave to resign as attorney is dismissed.

CATCHWORDS

HEALTH LAW – GUARDIANSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF PROPERTY OF PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED CAPACITY – ADMINISTRATION AND FINACIAL MANAGEMENT – GENERALLY – where adult was victim of a romance scam – whether an administrator should be appointed

Guardianship and Administration Act2000 (Qld), s 5(c), s 11(1), s 12(1)

Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (Qld), s 41(1), s 47(1), s 111A(1)

Lambourne & Ors v Marrable & Ors [2023] QSC 219

APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:

Adult:

N Mitchell, solicitor, Caxton Legal Centre

Applicant:

A Greenhalgh, solicitor, Mills Oakley

Public Trustee:

M Klewin

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

  1. These applications relate to a 74-year-old woman who, for privacy reasons, will be referred to only as RGB. The applications are made by one of her sons, concerning decision-making arrangements for RGB if she lacks capacity. The main impetus for the applications was that RGB lost a substantial amount of money in recent years in a romance scam. The losses totalled around $170,000, representing the bulk of RGB’s assets.

  2. The Public Trustee was appointed interim administrator for RGB for three months from 14 August 2023. The Public Trustee advises that RGB’s funds as of 7 November 2023 totalled approximately $7,500. She also owns a car. She owes $2,000 on a credit card and $669 to the State Penalties Enforcement Registry. She receives a pension. 

  3. RGB had appointed the son as her attorney for financial and personal/health matters in an enduring power of attorney made on 15 November 2006.

  4. In 2021 RGB was widowed. In 2022 she was living in a granny flat at the son’s home. The son says he became aware she was transferring significant sums and concluded that she was being scammed. He could not convince her of this, however. He took steps to monitor her bank account. His intervention was resented by RGB. The relationship between them became increasingly tense and disharmonious. Eventually he insisted that she leave the granny flat. She moved out on 14 October 2023 into a granny flat she found through Facebook. Sadly, RGB and the son have become estranged.

  5. Meanwhile, on 27 August 2022, RGB had signed a revocation of the enduring power of attorney. However, the revocation document misidentified the enduring document as one appointing both the son and his wife. Later, on 20 July 2023, RGB signed another…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read RGB and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2023] QCAT 501
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

RGB involved a dispute concerning the management and administration of the property of an adult individual who had been the victim of a romance scam. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland, where the court was asked to decide whether an administrator should be appointed for the individual's property, as well as to consider other related applications. The legal issues at the core of the case revolved around the capacity of the individual, the validity of an enduring power of attorney, and the appropriateness of appointing a guardian and an administrator.

The court meticulously evaluated the evidence presented regarding the individual's capacity to manage their own affairs. It found that while the individual had indeed fallen victim to a scam, there was sufficient evidence to suggest that they retained the capacity to manage their own affairs. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for the appointment of an administrator and the application for the appointment of a guardian. Furthermore, the court concluded that the enduring power of attorney executed by the individual on 15 November 2006 had been revoked on 20 July 2023. It also dismissed the application for leave to resign as attorney, finding that such resignation would not be in the best interests of the individual.

In its final orders, the tribunal dismissed all the applications brought before it, including the application for the appointment of an administrator, the application for the appointment of a guardian, the application for a declaration about capacity, and the application for leave to resign as attorney. The court did, however, declare that the enduring power of attorney made by RGB on 15 November 2006 was revoked on 20 July 2023. This decision underscores the importance of assessing an individual's capacity to manage their own affairs, even in the context of financial mismanagement or vulnerability, and highlights the need for careful consideration when making decisions regarding the appointment of administrators and guardians.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application for the appointment of an administrator is dismissed.

2. The application for the appointment of a guardian is dismissed.

3. The application for a declaration about capacity is dismissed.

4. The tribunal declares that the enduring power of attorney made by RGB on 15 November 2006 was revoked on 20 July 2023.

5. The application for leave to resign as attorney is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.