QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
RGB [2023] QCAT 501
PARTIES:
In applications about matters concerning RGB
APPLICATION NOS:
GAA9605-23, GAA9607-23, GAA9608-23, GAA9609-23, GAA12852-23
MATTER TYPE:
Guardianship and administration matters for adults
DELIVERED ON:
19 December 2023
HEARING DATE:
9 November 2023
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Member Kanowski
ORDERS:
1. The application for the appointment of an administrator is dismissed.
2. The application for the appointment of a guardian is dismissed.
3. The application for a declaration about capacity is dismissed.
4. The tribunal declares that the enduring power of attorney made by RGB on 15 November 2006 was revoked on 20 July 2023.
5. The application for leave to resign as attorney is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS
HEALTH LAW – GUARDIANSHIP, MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF PROPERTY OF PERSONS WITH IMPAIRED CAPACITY – ADMINISTRATION AND FINACIAL MANAGEMENT – GENERALLY – where adult was victim of a romance scam – whether an administrator should be appointed
Guardianship and Administration Act2000 (Qld), s 5(c), s 11(1), s 12(1)
Powers of Attorney Act 1998 (Qld), s 41(1), s 47(1), s 111A(1)
APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
Adult:
N Mitchell, solicitor, Caxton Legal Centre
Applicant:
A Greenhalgh, solicitor, Mills Oakley
Public Trustee:
M Klewin
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
These applications relate to a 74-year-old woman who, for privacy reasons, will be referred to only as RGB. The applications are made by one of her sons, concerning decision-making arrangements for RGB if she lacks capacity. The main impetus for the applications was that RGB lost a substantial amount of money in recent years in a romance scam. The losses totalled around $170,000, representing the bulk of RGB’s assets.
The Public Trustee was appointed interim administrator for RGB for three months from 14 August 2023. The Public Trustee advises that RGB’s funds as of 7 November 2023 totalled approximately $7,500. She also owns a car. She owes $2,000 on a credit card and $669 to the State Penalties Enforcement Registry. She receives a pension.
RGB had appointed the son as her attorney for financial and personal/health matters in an enduring power of attorney made on 15 November 2006.
In 2021 RGB was widowed. In 2022 she was living in a granny flat at the son’s home. The son says he became aware she was transferring significant sums and concluded that she was being scammed. He could not convince her of this, however. He took steps to monitor her bank account. His intervention was resented by RGB. The relationship between them became increasingly tense and disharmonious. Eventually he insisted that she leave the granny flat. She moved out on 14 October 2023 into a granny flat she found through Facebook. Sadly, RGB and the son have become estranged.
Meanwhile, on 27 August 2022, RGB had signed a revocation of the enduring power of attorney. However, the revocation document misidentified the enduring document as one appointing both the son and his wife. Later, on 20 July 2023, RGB signed another…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read RGB and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] QCAT 501
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court meticulously evaluated the evidence presented regarding the individual's capacity to manage their own affairs. It found that while the individual had indeed fallen victim to a scam, there was sufficient evidence to suggest that they retained the capacity to manage their own affairs. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for the appointment of an administrator and the application for the appointment of a guardian. Furthermore, the court concluded that the enduring power of attorney executed by the individual on 15 November 2006 had been revoked on 20 July 2023. It also dismissed the application for leave to resign as attorney, finding that such resignation would not be in the best interests of the individual.
In its final orders, the tribunal dismissed all the applications brought before it, including the application for the appointment of an administrator, the application for the appointment of a guardian, the application for a declaration about capacity, and the application for leave to resign as attorney. The court did, however, declare that the enduring power of attorney made by RGB on 15 November 2006 was revoked on 20 July 2023. This decision underscores the importance of assessing an individual's capacity to manage their own affairs, even in the context of financial mismanagement or vulnerability, and highlights the need for careful consideration when making decisions regarding the appointment of administrators and guardians.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application for the appointment of an administrator is dismissed.
2. The application for the appointment of a guardian is dismissed.
3. The application for a declaration about capacity is dismissed.
4. The tribunal declares that the enduring power of attorney made by RGB on 15 November 2006 was revoked on 20 July 2023.
5. The application for leave to resign as attorney is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.