| [2025] FWCFB 156 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.157—FWC may vary etc. modern awards if necessary to achieve modern awards objective
Review of degree-qualified professional classifications
(AM2025/19)
| JUSTICE HATCHER, PRESIDENT DEPUTY PRESIDENT GRAYSON COMMISSIONER ALLISON DR RISSE | SYDNEY, 25 JULY 2025 |
Review of degree-qualified professional classifications in certain modern awards – Commission’s own initiative – provisional list of classifications identified in 22 modern awards – initial issues to be determined.
As foreshadowed in Annual Wage Review 2025[1] (AWR 2025 decision), the Fair Work Commission is commencing a new matter on its own initiative pursuant to s 157(3)(a) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) to review classifications requiring a degree qualification in modern awards. The review will be conducted by an Expert Panel constituted in accordance with ss 617(6) and 620(1B) of the FW Act.
The proceedings have been commenced to consider variations on work value grounds, including gender‑based undervaluation grounds, to classifications in modern awards that require, as a minimum, an undergraduate university degree (professional classifications) and have pay rates that are not aligned with the C1(a) benchmark rate.[2] The Expert Panel in the AWR 2025 decision stated:[3]
… Professional occupations, considered as a whole, are majority female (55.4 per cent). However, a much higher proportion — 69.7 per cent — of modern award-reliant professionals are female. This surpasses the threshold of 60 per cent female identified for feminised occupations in the Priority Awards Review decision and makes clear that the detriment of non-alignment with the C1(a) benchmark rate principally accrues to female professionals.
(citations omitted)
The AWR 2025 decision set out in detail the background to these proceedings:[4]
The issue of the non-alignment of professional classifications has been identified in a number of recent Full Bench/Expert Panel decisions as a work value or gender-based undervaluation issue that should be addressed, including the Pharmacy decision, the Teachers decision, the Stage 1 Aged Care decision, the AWR 2023 decision, the Stage 3 Aged Care decision and the Priority Awards Review decision. The minimum award wage rates for teachers covered by the Educational Services (Teachers) Award 2020, RNs in aged care covered by the Nurses Award and pharmacists covered by the Pharmacy Award have now been adjusted based on an alignment with the C1(a) benchmark rate or are in the process of phasing in such an outcome. Further, in the Priority Awards Review decision, the Expert Panel found that the minimum wage rates of health professional employees covered by the HPSS Award were the subject of gender-based undervaluation for reasons including that they were not aligned with the C1(a) benchmark rate, and provisionally proposed that a new classification structure be established based on an alignment with the C1(a) benchmark rate for Australian Qualifications Framework Level 7-qualified employees. And, as earlier noted, the Nurses and Midwives case has as a major element the establishment of a broad alignment with the C1(a) benchmark rate.
(citations omitted)
The proceedings may also review classifications requiring a diploma qualification that do not align with the equivalent level in the C10 Metals Framework.[5]
A provisional list of the classifications in 22 modern awards to be considered was provided at Appendix 2 of the AWR 2025 decision. That provisional list is reproduced in Attachment A to this Statement.
Initial issues to be considered
As indicated in the AWR 2025 decision, we invite interested parties to comment on the following initial issues:
(1)the provisional list of the professional classifications and awards to be the subject of the review; and
(2)whether there are classifications in the identified awards for which a diploma qualification is required but which are not aligned with the equivalent level in the C10 Metals Framework, and if so, whether that classification should form part of the review.
Next steps
A new major case webpage has been established for this matter: ‘Degree-qualified professional classifications review’. All material related to the case will be published on the major case webpage. Interested parties are encouraged to subscribe to receive updates.
Interested parties are directed to file submissions in relation to those matters by 4:00 pm (AEST) on Friday, 22 August 2025. Submissions should be sent to awards@fwc.gov.au, after which they will be published on the Commission’s major case webpage.
PRESIDENT
Attachment A: Provisional list of the classifications requiring a university degree qualification and awards to be the subject of review
| Award code | Award title | Classification name |
| MA000001 | Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2020 | ‘Degree qualified’ graduate engineers and commercial officers (Groups I and J) [clauses B.2.3(a)–(b)]. |
| MA000006 | Higher Education Industry—Academic Staff—Award 2020 | Teaching and research academic staff — Level A [clause A.1.1]. |
| Research academic staff (incl. creative disciplines) — Level A [clause A.2.1]. | ||
| MA000007 | Higher Education Industry—General Staff—Award 2020 | Higher Education Worker Level 5 (HEW 5) [clause A.2.5] Higher Education Worker Level 6 (HEW 6) [clause A.2.6] Higher Education Worker Level 7 (HEW 7) [clause A.2.7] Higher Education Worker Level 8 (HEW 8) [clause A.2.8] Higher Education Worker Level 9 (HEW 9) [clause A.2.9] Higher Education Worker Level 10 (HEW 10) [clause A.2.10] |
| MA000015 | Rail Industry Award 2020 | Clerical, Administrative and Professional Classifications, Levels 3–8 [Schedule A]. |
| MA000031 | Medical Practitioners Award 2020 | All classifications require undergraduate degree [clause 12]. Other classifications identify postgraduate requirements including:
|
| MA000049 | Airport Employees Award 2020 | Professional Engineers, Level 1–5; ‘Qualified engineer’ Level 1 [clause A.4] Administrative services officer Level 3 [clause A.2.3] |
| MA000064 | Hydrocarbons Field Geologists Award 2020 | Trainee mudlogger [clause 10.1]. Competent mudlogger [clause 10.2]. Senior mudlogger [clause 10.3]. Data engineer [clause 10.4]. |
| MA000065 | Professional Employees Award 2020 | All classifications in Schedules A and B, starting at Level 1 — Graduate professional [clause A.1.1]. |
| MA000066 | Surveying Award 2020 | Professional surveyor [clause A.15] |
| MA000075 | Educational Services (Post-Secondary Education) Award 2020 | Level A academic teacher [clause A.7.1] Teachers employed in English language colleges or in TESOL courses categories A, B, and C [clause B.2.1] Teachers other than TESOL teachers categories A, B, and C [clause B.3.1] General Staff Level 4 [clause C.1.7(b)] General Staff Levels 5 to 9 [clauses C.1.8–C.1.12] |
| MA000076 | Educational Services (Schools) General Staff Award 2020 | Levels 5–8 [clauses A.2.5–A.2.8] |
| MA000078 | Book Industry Award 2020 | Level 1 — Trainee book editor [clause A.1.1(a)] |
| MA000079 | Architects Award 2020 | Level 1 — Graduate of Architecture [clauses A.1, 2] |
| MA000081 | Live Performance Award 2020 | Production and Support Staff Level 8 [clause A.10.2] |
| MA000088 | Electrical Power Industry Award 2020 | Professional / Managerial / Specialist Grade 5 [clause A.4.1] |
| MA000091 | Broadcasting and Recorded Entertainment Award 2020 | Performers [clause E.2.2(b)] Subtitling editor [clause A.1.1(h)] |
| MA000098 | Ambulance and Patient Transport Industry Award 2020 | Ambulance Officer (AO) and Ambulance Paramedic (AP) [clause A.1.1]. Intensive Care Paramedic [clause A.1.3] Station Officer/Team Manager [clause A.1.4] Assistant Station Officer (ASO) [clause A.1.5] Regional Relieving Officer (RRO) [clause A.1.6] Clinical Support Officer (CSO) [clause A.1.10] Communications Officer [clause A.1.13] Senior Station Officer [clause A.1.15] |
| MA000112 | Local Government Industry Award 2020 | Level 7 [clause A.7.6] Level 9 [clause A.9.6] Level 10 [clause A.10.6] Level 11 [clause A.11.6]. |
| MA000113 | Water Industry Award 2020 | Level 7 [clause A.7.6]. Level 9 [clause A.9.6]. Level 10 [clause A.10.6]. |
| MA000116 | Legal Services Award 2020 | Level 5 — Law Graduate [clause A.6.1]. |
| MA000118 | Animal Care and Veterinary Services Award 2020 | Veterinary surgeon — Level 1A [clause A.3.1] |
| MA000121 | State Government Agencies Award 2020 | Administrative Officer Grade 4 [clause A.1.4] Technical Officer Grade 5 [clause A.2.6]. Professional Officer Grade 2 [clause A.3.2]. Professional Officer Grade 3 [clause A.3.3] Professional Officer Grade 5 [clause A.3.5] |
[1] [2025] FWCFB 3500 (‘AWR 2025 decision’).
[2] The benchmark rate identified in paragraph [204] of the Stage 3 Aged Care decision ([2024] FWCFB 150), as adjusted by the AWR 2024 decision [2024] FWCFB 3500 and AWR 2025 decision.
[3] [2025] FWCFB 3500 [82].
[4] Ibid [83].
[5] Ibid [84].
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR790035>
- AGLC
- Review of degree-qualified professional classifications [2025] FWCFB 156
- Case
- [2025] FWCFB 156
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the identified classifications in the modern awards, which require a degree qualification, should be aligned with the C1(a) benchmark rate. Additionally, the court had to determine if classifications requiring a diploma qualification but not aligned with the equivalent level in the C10 Metals Framework should be included in the review. These issues were critical in ensuring fair wage rates for degree-qualified professionals and addressing gender-based undervaluation.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission accepted the provisional list of classifications and awards for review and invited submissions from interested parties by 4:00 pm (AEST) on Friday, 22 August 2025. The Commission will consider the submissions and proceed with the review to determine if variations are necessary to achieve the modern awards objective. The court emphasized the importance of aligning professional classifications with the benchmark rate to ensure fair compensation, particularly for female-dominated professions.
The Fair Work Commission established a major case webpage for this matter, detailing all related information and updates. Submissions from interested parties were to be sent to the Commission and would be published on the major case webpage. This case marks a significant step towards rectifying gender-based undervaluation in degree-qualified professional classifications within modern awards.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.