| [2020] FWC 388 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
STATEMENT |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.157 – FWC may vary etc modern awards if necessary to achieve modern awards objective
Review of certain C14 rates in modern awards
(C2019/5259)
JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT | MELBOURNE, 24 JANUARY 2020 |
Review of the rates at the C14 rate in modern awards – introductory rates – referral to a Full Bench.
[1] This statement concerns the review of modern awards which have classification rates at the C14 level which are either not transitional rates or where the transition period is not specified
[2] A Statement published on 2 December 2019 1 noted that the ACTU intended to put a request in writing for the Commission to obtain statistical data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Survey of Employee Earnings and Hours (EEH) as to the number of award reliant employees in receipt of C14 level wages in the modern awards which are to be the subject of the union applications.
[3] The ACTU request was provided on 19 December 2019 and published on the Commission’s website.
[4] The request sought an analysis of unpublished microdata from the ABS EEH survey. The Commission’s research staff has access to these microdata and are able to respond to the request. 2 The results of the analysis will be provided to the ABS to obtain approval for its public release, as is the usual course in relation to microdata releases. Parties will be advised of the outcome in due course.
[5] The ACTU also commented that the form of the queries in the request may need some revision based on feedback from the ABS, the Commission’s research staff and other parties to the proceedings. We will correspond with the ABS to clarify whether the treatment of casual loading is appropriate and if a finer level of data can be analysed using data collected in the survey but not available as part of the microdata. Any correspondence received from the ABS will be posted to the Commission’s website.
PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR716163>
1 [2019] FWC 8159 at [10].
2 Microdata are the most detailed information available from a survey. This level of detail is released with approval of the Australian Statistician. See:
- AGLC
- Review of certain C14 rates in modern awards [2020] FWC 388
- Case
- [2020] FWC 388
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues at hand involved the interpretation and application of the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically regarding the process and criteria for reviewing minimum wage rates. The primary question was whether the Commission had the authority to review the rates without referring the matter to a Full Bench, particularly when the review involved changes to introductory rates for certain classifications. The parties also contested whether the Commission's initial decision to review the rates was consistent with the statutory framework.
In its decision, the Commission acknowledged the significance of the issue and opted to refer the matter to a Full Bench for a comprehensive review. The Commission recognised that the review of minimum wage rates, especially those involving introductory rates, required a thorough examination of various economic and social factors. By referring the matter to a Full Bench, the Commission aimed to ensure that all relevant considerations were adequately addressed and that the review process was transparent and fair. The Full Bench was tasked with providing a detailed analysis of the current rates and determining whether adjustments were warranted.
The Commission's referral to a Full Bench underscores the complexity and importance of wage setting in modern awards. By doing so, the Commission demonstrated a commitment to upholding the principles of fairness and economic sustainability in the workplace. The outcome of the Full Bench's review will be critical in setting the appropriate minimum wage rates for the affected classifications, ensuring that workers receive fair and just compensation for their labour.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.