Rein Karja v Delta Pty LTd
[2012] FWA 9262
•30 OCTOBER 2012
[2012] FWA 9262 |
|
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Rein Karja
v
Delta Pty LTd
(U2012/11605)
COMMISSIONER DEEGAN | CANBERRA, 30 OCTOBER 2012 |
Unfair dismissal - non-compliance with Directions - application dismissed.
[1] On 20 July 2012 Mr Rein Karja (the applicant) lodged an application pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a remedy for unfair dismissal in respect of the termination of his employment by Delta Pty Ltd (the respondent).
[2] The matter was listed for a conciliation conference on 7 August 2012. The applicant did not answer his phone at this time so the conference could not take place.
[3] Attempts were made to contact the applicant regarding an alternative listing time. When the applicant did not answer the calls, the matter was allocated for arbitration.
[4] Directions were issued on 21 August 2012, requiring the applicant to file an outline of submissions and witness statements by 11 September in preparation for the arbitration hearing which was listed to occur on 25 October. The applicant did not file the relevant documentation by 11 September and, despite repeated attempts by my Chambers to contact him, by both telephone and email, the applicant has not filed any further documentation to date.
[5] When the matter called on for hearing on 25 October there was no appearance for the applicant. A representative from the respondent was informed prior to the hearing that they would not be required to file any written material or attend the hearing.
[6] Section 587 of the Act provides as follows:
587 Dismissing Applications
(1) Without limiting when FWA may dismiss an application, FWA may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with the Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success
(2) Despite paragraph (1)(b) and (c), FWA must not dismiss an application under section 365 or 773 on the ground that the application is:
(a) frivolous or vexatious; or
(b) has no reasonable prospect of success.
(3) FWA may dismiss an application:
(a) on its own initiative
(b) on application.
[7] I note that s.587(1) does not limit the circumstances in which Fair Work Australia may dismiss an application.
[8] In all the circumstances of this matter, I have decided to dismiss the application for want of prosecution pursuant to s.587(3)(a) of the Act.
COMMISSIONER
Appearances:
No appearance for the applicant.
The respondent was not required to appear.
Hearing details:
2012.
Canberra:
October, 25.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR530825>
0
0
0