Reid v Howard
[1995] HCATrans 363
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S65 of 1994
B e t w e e n -
HUGH NAIRN REID
Appellant
and
STANLEY JOSEPH HOWARD & CAROLINE JANE HOWARD AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE JOCELYN JEAN RITCHIE
First Respondents
CAROLINE JANE HOWARD
Second Respondent
CRANWELL PTY LIMITED
Third Respondent
J.W. INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED
Fourth Respondent
SUE TURNBULL & JESSIE EILEEN TURNBULL
Fifth Respondents
Costs order
DEANE ACJ
TOOHEY J
GAUDRON J
McHUGH J
GUMMOW J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT CANBERRA ON WEDNESDAY, 6 DECEMBER 1995, AT 10.18 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
______________________
TOOHEY J: The Court handed down judgment in this matter in Canberra on 24 October 1995. The question of costs in this Court and of the proceedings in the courts below was stood over to enable the parties to file written submissions. The parties have since filed written submissions and these have been considered by the Court which now makes the following order:
Set aside the orders as to costs in matter No 1885 of 1993 and matter No 1923 of 1993 made by Mr Justice Powell on 6 April 1993 and, in lieu thereof, order that each party pay their own costs of the proceedings in the Equity Division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in so far as they relate to the question of self-incrimination.
The respondents pay the costs of the appellant in the Court of Appeal.
Remit the matter to the Court of Appeal to permit the respondents to apply for a certificate under the Suitors’ Fund Act 1951 of New South Wales.
No order as to the costs of proceedings in this Court.
AT 10.20 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Constitutional Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
0
0
0