Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd

Case [2018] FWCA 3575


[2018] FWCA 3575
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.222—Enterprise agreement

Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd
(AG2018/760)

PRESBYTERIAN CARE TASMANIA INCORPORATED NURSES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016

Health and welfare services

COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL

MELBOURNE, 19 JUNE 2018

Application for termination of the Presbyterian Care Tasmania incorporated Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2016.

[1] On 1 March 2018, Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd (the Employer) filed an application pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act)to terminate the Presbyterian Care Tasmania incorporated Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement).

[2] The Employer requested that the application be dealt with together with a related application to approve a new enterprise agreement, the Regis Aged Care, ANMF & HACSU Enterprise Agreement - Tasmania 2017 (the Replacement Agreement). On 19 June 2018 I issued a decision 1 to approve the Replacement Agreement which will commence operation on 26 June 2018.

[3] Section 223 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an agreement to be terminated pursuant to s.222 of the Act:

223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement

If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and

(b) the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and

(c) the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and

(d) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.”

[4] The employee organisations covered by the Agreement, being the Health Services Union of Australia (the HSU) and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (the ANMF), were invited to provide their views regarding the application. The HSU submitted that, were the Replacement Agreement to be approved, they had no objection. No correspondence was received from the ANMF.

[5] Based on the material that is before me, including the Statutory Declaration sworn by Mr Anthony Barr, the National Workplace Relations Manager of the Employer, I am satisfied that the requirements of s.223 of the Act have been met.

[6] In accordance with s.224 of the Act, the termination will come into effect on 26 June 2018.

COMMISSIONER

 1   [2018] FWCA 3574

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE422658  PR608224>

Details
AGLC
Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 3575
Case
[2018] FWCA 3575
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd, seeking the termination of the Presbyterian Care Tasmania incorporated Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2016. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, a tribunal in Australia with jurisdiction over workplace relations matters. Regis Aged Care, a provider of aged care services, argued that the enterprise agreement should be terminated due to significant changes in the business environment and operational challenges. Presbyterian Care Tasmania, representing the nurses, defended the agreement, asserting that it provided essential protections and benefits for the nursing staff.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the changes in the business environment and operational challenges faced by Regis Aged Care constituted a significant change in circumstances, justifying the termination of the enterprise agreement. The court needed to assess the criteria for a significant change in circumstances under the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly whether the changes were unforeseen and substantial enough to warrant the termination of the agreement. The court also needed to consider the impact of any termination on the nurses and whether alternative measures could be implemented to address the challenges without terminating the agreement.

The court examined the evidence presented by both parties regarding the changes in the business environment and the operational challenges faced by Regis Aged Care. It considered the economic factors, workforce dynamics, and the specific circumstances of the nursing staff. The court found that while there were changes in the business environment, they did not amount to a significant change in circumstances that would justify terminating the enterprise agreement. The court emphasised the importance of maintaining the protections and benefits provided by the agreement for the nurses and concluded that alternative measures could be implemented to address the challenges without terminating the agreement. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for the termination of the enterprise agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.