| [2015] FWCA 6402 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Regional Publishers Pty Ltd T/A Manning River Times
(AG2015/4849)
MANNING RIVER TIMES PREPRESS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Graphic Arts | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 18 SEPTEMBER 2015 |
Application for termination of the Manning River Times Prepress Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] On 2 September 2015, Regional Publishers Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Manning River Times Prepress Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE897338 PR571964>
- AGLC
- Regional Publishers Pty Ltd T/A Manning River Times [2015] FWCA 6402
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6402
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The commission began by examining whether Regional Publishers had met the statutory criteria for termination. This involved assessing the company’s financial position and whether it could demonstrate that the enterprise agreement was no longer sustainable. The company argued that the enterprise agreement was no longer commercially viable due to significant changes in the newspaper industry, including the decline in print advertising revenue. The commission found that while the company had faced financial difficulties, it had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the enterprise agreement was the primary cause of these issues. Additionally, the commission noted that the company had not adequately explored alternative cost-saving measures before seeking termination.
The Fair Work Commission concluded that the application for termination of the Manning River Times Prepress Enterprise Agreement 2012 was not successful. The decision highlighted the importance of employers providing comprehensive evidence to support their claims of unsustainability. The commission also emphasised the need for employers to exhaust all reasonable alternatives before seeking to terminate an enterprise agreement. The court found that the company had not met the necessary threshold for termination and thus upheld the existing enterprise agreement.
The final orders of the commission included dismissing the application for termination of the enterprise agreement and mandating further negotiations between the parties to address any outstanding issues. The commission also directed the parties to participate in further mediation to resolve any remaining disputes. The decision underscored the importance of robust evidence and the need for employers to consider all viable alternatives before seeking to terminate an enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.