CITATION: Regina v NMTP [2000] NSWSC 1170 revised - 23/02/2001 FILE NUMBER(S): SC 70023/00 HEARING DATE(S): 19/10/00, 23/10/00, 24/10/00, 25/10/00, 27/10/00, 30/10/00, 31/10/00, 01/11/00, 02/11/00, 03/11/00, 06/11/00, 07/11/00, 08/11/00, 09/11/0, 10/11/00, 13/11/00, 14/11/00, 15/11/00, 16/11/00, 17/11/00, 20/11/00, 20/12/00 JUDGMENT DATE: 20 December 2000 PARTIES :
Regina
NMTPJUDGMENT OF: Bell J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr B Newport QC Crown
Mr J Gordon - prisonerSOLICITORS: S E O'Connor - Crown
Clive Jeffreys & Associates - prisonerLEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900
Criminal Procedure Act 1986
Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999CASES CITED: R v Crombie [1999] NSWCCA 297
R v Coleman (1990) 19 NSWLR 467
R v Fltecher-Jones (1994) 75 A Crim R 381
R v GDP (1991) 53 A Crim R 112
R v Pham (1991) 55 A Crim R 128DECISION: Count 2 - firing a firearm in a public place - sentenced to 3 months imprisonment to date from 06/11/99. Count 3 - malicious wounding of Paul Hoa Long Dinh with intent to do him grievous bodily harm - sentenced to a term of 3 years imprisonment to date from 6/11/99. Non parole period of 18 months imposed. Count 4 - maliciously discharging a loaded arm with intent to do grievous bodily harm to Chompeay Kim - sentenced to a term of 2 years imprisonment to commence on 6 November 2000.
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
CRIMINAL DIVISIONBELL J
Wednesday, 20 December, 2000
70023/00 - REGINA v N M T P
SENTENCE1 HER HONOUR: On 30 October 2000 the prisoner, NMTP was arraigned before me on an indictment charging him with four offences arising out of an incident that occurred in John Street, Cabramatta on the evening of 6 November 1999. By the first count he was charged with the murder of Paul Hoa Long Dinh. The second count charged him with firing a firearm in a public place. The third count charged him with maliciously wounding Paul Hoa Long Dinh with intent to do him grievous bodily harm and the fourth count charged him with maliciously discharging a loaded arm with intent to do grievous bodily harm to Chompeay Kim. On 20 November 2000 the jury returned its verdicts. The prisoner was acquitted of the murder of Paul Hoa Long Dinh and convicted of the remaining three counts in the indictment.
2 On the evening of Saturday, 6 November 1999 the prisoner was one of a number of young people attending a wedding reception at the Dai Lam Son Restaurant in John Street, Cabramatta. During the course of the evening, there was some trouble between guests seated at the prisoner's table and others at an adjacent table at which a young man named Chompeay Kim was seated. Mr Kim became upset about the behaviour of some of the young men who were smoking in the presence of his nine year old sister, Linda. He remonstrated with them and there was an angry exchange.
3 Chompeay…
Continue reading Regina v NMTP
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Regina v NMTP [2000] NSWSC 1170
- Case
- [2000] NSWSC 1170
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that while the first shot was potentially justified as self-defense, the subsequent shots were not. The court held that the defendant's intoxication, though present, did not significantly mitigate his culpability. The court also noted the defendant's young age, lack of prior convictions, and positive background as factors supporting rehabilitation. However, the seriousness of the offences, particularly the intent to cause grievous bodily harm, necessitated custodial sentences. The court imposed concurrent sentences for the first offence and a partly cumulative sentence for the other two offences, reflecting the totality of the defendant's criminal conduct. The defendant was sentenced to three months for firing a firearm in public, three years for the wounding offence with a non-parole period of 18 months, and two years for the discharging offence with a non-parole period of 12 months, to be served in a detention centre.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.