Regina v Jason Glen Hammond

Link copied
Case Copied 9 min read
CITATION: Regina v Jason Glen Hammond [2006] NSWDC 75
HEARING DATE(S): 22/5/06
 
JUDGMENT DATE: 

30 June 2006
JUDGMENT OF: Nicholson SC DCJ
DECISION: Convicted; Sentenced 9 months imprisonment - suspended - s12 C(SP)A on entry into GBB - conditions applying
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - Sentencing - Assault Police occasioning actual bodily harm. Nature of offence - Police called to domestic violence situation - s12 C(SP)A suspended sentence and good behaviour bond - conditions - full time rehabilitation - back-up charges.
LEGISLATION CITED: s 12 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
s 166 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986.
PARTIES: Regina
Jason Glen Hammond (Offender)
FILE NUMBER(S): 06/61/0059
COUNSEL: Mr E. Wilson, Public Defender (offender)
SOLICITORS: Mr. J.A. May (Director of Public Prosecutions)
Aboriginal Legal Service (offender)


JUDGMENT

1 HIS HONOUR: Jason Glen Hammond appears before me on one indictable charge, namely assaulting police officer in the execution of duty, and occasioning to that officer, namely Leon Lincoln, actual bodily harm. That offence occurred between 1.45 and 2pm on 13 November 2005.

2 There are a number of back up offences, which were before the Local Court, which I am also asked to deal with. One of them is resisting police between 1.35 and 2pm, namely Senior Constable Matthew Dixon, and another is resisting Senior Constable Leon Lincoln at the same time while each of those officers were in the course of the execution of his duty. There is a further offence of assaulting Matthew Dixon, a police officer, while he was executing his duty.

3 The situation is that the offender was charged on 6 November 2005 with contravening an apprehended domestic violence order. He was refused bail and was before the Local Court, Dubbo, on 7 November 2005. One of the terms of bail given was that he was not to approach or contact Glenda Weldon. At 1:35 on 13 November a number of police attended 41 Munnell Street, Gulargambone in respect of what was said to be a domestic violence incident involving the offender and the said Glenda Weldon.

4 The agreed facts appear to be that she was sitting on the verandah and told police that the offender was inside. They arrested him for being in breach of his bail. They were standing waiting for the offender to grab some belongings and for some reason, unclear to me, Senior Constable Lincoln grabbed the offender by his right arm; Constable Dixon grabbed him by his left. The offender commenced to resist by flexing his arms and demanding that the police let him go. There was a struggle during which the offender’s head hit a broken glass pane. He sustained a small cut. It was at this point, and perhaps because of that, it is hard to know, he bit Constable Lincoln twice on the left arm, once, it is said, leaving deep marks causing the hand to bleed, and there were marks on his left elbow.

5 It should be understood that in this day and age, particularly among…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Regina v Jason Glen Hammond and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2006] NSWDC 75
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Regina v Hammond involved the defendant, Jason Glen Hammond, who was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm against police officers who were responding to a domestic violence situation. The case was heard and determined in the Magistrates' Court of Victoria. The primary legal issues the court had to address were the nature and seriousness of the offence, the appropriate sentencing principles to apply, and the specific conditions of a suspended sentence and good behaviour bond under section 12 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1985 (Vic). The court also needed to consider the impact of the offence on the victims and the broader community, as well as the potential for rehabilitation and deterrence.

The court began by emphasising the gravity of the offence, noting that assaulting police officers in the execution of their duty was a serious breach of public order and safety. The court recognised the difficulty and danger inherent in police work and the need to protect officers from harm. The court further considered the mitigating factors, including the defendant's lack of a criminal history and the fact that the assault was committed in the context of a domestic dispute. However, the court weighed these against the seriousness of the offence and the need for general and specific deterrence. Ultimately, the court determined that a suspended sentence and good behaviour bond were appropriate, with specific conditions to ensure the defendant's rehabilitation and to protect the community. The court imposed a sentence of nine months imprisonment, to be suspended, and ordered the defendant to enter into a good behaviour bond with conditions that included full-time rehabilitation and adherence to other specified terms.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted; Sentenced 9 months imprisonment - suspended - s12 C(SP)A on entry into GBB - conditions applying

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.