Regina v DWF19 (No 2)

Case [2019] NFSC 4


SUPREME COURT OF NORFOLK ISLAND

Regina v DWF19 (No 2) [2019] NFSC 4

File numbers: SCC 1 of 2019
SCC 2 of 2019
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 8 October 2019
Catchwords:

CRIMINAL LAW – where offender pleaded guilty to 1 count of committing an act of indecency on another person contrary to s 118(1) of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI) – where offender pleaded guilty to 13 counts of committing an act of indecency on, or in presence of, a person under 16 years of age contrary to s 119(2) of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI) – where offender pleaded guilty to 13 counts of engaging in sexual intercourse with a person under 16 years of age contrary to s 113(2) of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI) – where offender pleaded guilty to 3 counts of using a child under 12 years of age for the production of child pornography contrary to s 122(1)(a)(i) of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI) – where offender pleaded guilty to 1 count of using a child aged 12 years or older contrary to s 122(3) of the Criminal Code 2007 (NI)

CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing under s 5(2) of the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI) – consideration of extent to which offender’s good character can be taken into account after first offence – aggravating circumstances – offender’s position of trust and destruction of evidence – mitigating circumstances – where offender had no prior convictions – where offender pleaded guilty and relieved victims of having to give evidence

Legislation:

Criminal Code 2007 (NI) ss 108, 113, 118, 119, 122

Sentencing Act 2007 (NI) ss 5, 142

Cases cited:

Reg v DWF19 (No 1) [2019] NFSC 3

Veen v The Queen [No. 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465

Date of hearing: 7, 8 October 2019
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 65
Counsel for the Prosecution: Mr J Hunter QC with Ms S Cartledge
Solicitor for the Prosecution: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
Counsel for the Offender: Ms L Reece
Solicitor for the Offender: McIntyres Lawyers

ORDERS

SCC 1 of 2019
BETWEEN:

REGINA

Prosecutor

AND:

DWF19

Offender

JUDGE:

RARES J

DATE OF ORDER:

8 OCTOBER 2019

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.Convictions be entered on each count in the indictment signed on 2 August 2019 and the offender be sentenced to the following terms of imprisonment:

(a)on count 30, commencing on 20 July 2018, 15 months imprisonment (6 months of which be served concurrently with the sentence imposed in proceeding No. SCC 2 of 2019);

(b)on count 1, commencing on 20 August 2018, 15 months imprisonment;

(c)on count 2, commencing on 20 September 2018, 15 months imprisonment;

(d)on count 3, commencing on 20 October 2018, 15 months imprisonment;

(e)on count 4, commencing on 20 July 2018, two years imprisonment;

(f)on count 5, commencing on 20 July 2018, three years and six months imprisonment;

(g)on count 6, commencing on 20 January 2019, three years and six months imprisonment;

(h)on count 7, commencing on 20 January 2019, four years and…

Continue reading Regina v DWF19 (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Regina v DWF19 (No 2) [2019] NFSC 4
Case
[2019] NFSC 4
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Regina v DWF19 (No 2) involved an offender who pleaded guilty to multiple counts of serious sexual offences against minors, including acts of indecency, sexual intercourse with persons under 16, and using children for the production of child pornography. The offender's conduct spanned from 20 July 2018, the date of the first offence, to the date of the sentencing hearing. The case was heard and determined in the Northern Territory Court, where the court was required to consider both aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing the offender.

The court was tasked with determining the appropriate sentence for the offender under the Sentencing Act 2007 (NI), considering the extent to which the offender's good character could be taken into account, particularly after the first offence. Aggravating factors included the offender's position of trust and the destruction of evidence. Mitigating factors included the offender's lack of prior convictions and the fact that the offender pleaded guilty, which relieved the victims from having to give evidence. The court considered these factors in light of the severity and frequency of the offences committed.

After a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances, the court entered a conviction on the first count of the indictment, imposing a sentence of six months imprisonment. Given that the offender had been in custody on remand since the date of the first offence, the court noted that the offender had effectively served this sentence. The court's decision balanced the need for deterrence and denunciation with the need to consider the offender's personal circumstances and the impact of the offences on the victims.

The final orders of the court included the entry of a conviction on the first count and a sentence of six months imprisonment, which was deemed to have been served by the time of sentencing. The court's decision also acknowledged the offender's time spent in custody since the date of the first offence, ensuring that the sentencing reflected both the gravity of the offences and the offender's pre-sentence conduct.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. A conviction be entered on count 1 in the indictment signed on 15 July 2019 and the offender be sentenced to six months imprisonment commencing on 20 July 2018.

THE COURT NOTES THAT:

2. The offender has been in custody on remand since 20 July 2018 and is taken to have served this sentence.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.