| [2016] FWCA 332 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Recall Information Management Pty Ltd
(AG2015/6995)
RECALL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PTY LTD QLD - ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 18 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Recall Information Management Pty Ltd QLD - Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Recall Information Management Pty Ltd QLD - Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Recall Information Management Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The National Union of Workers being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 November 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE417477 PR576190>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Recall Information Management Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 332
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 332
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission related to the fairness and validity of the proposed agreement. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it provided for the minimum terms and conditions of employment, and whether it had been negotiated in good faith. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable, and met the requirements of the Act. The agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions of employment, and had been negotiated in good faith. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees, and approved the agreement. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for a range of benefits for employees, including increased pay rates, improved leave entitlements, and additional training opportunities. The Commission also noted that the agreement included provisions for dispute resolution, which would provide a mechanism for resolving any issues that might arise in the future.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.