JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
CITATION: RE TRUSTEES ACT 1962 (WA); EX PARTE SANG HYUN GWON by his next friend RAYMOND WILLIAM WEBB [2018] WASC 127
CORAM: KENNETH MARTIN J
HEARD: 25 OCTOBER 2017 & 23 MARCH 2018
DELIVERED : 26 APRIL 2018
FILE NO/S: CIV 2617 of 2017
MATTER: The Trustees Act 1962 (WA) (the Act)
and
Sections 77 and 93(1) of the Act
and
Order 62 Rule 1 of the Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA)
and
An application for leave for the appointment of a Trustee
EX PARTE
SANG HYUN GWON by his next friend RAYMOND WILLIAM WEBB
Plaintiff
Catchwords:
Practice and procedure - Person under disability - Unresolved personal injury proceeding pending in District Court of Western Australia - Liability admitted - Quantum unresolved in proceeding - Interim payment prior to judgment by agreement on terms - Interim payment sought on basis of payment to interim trustee - Power of Supreme Court to order payment to private trustee corporation
Legislation:
Trustees Act 1952 (WA)
Result:
Orders not made
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
| Plaintiff | : | Mr J N D'Angelo |
Solicitors:
| Plaintiff | : | Chan Galic |
Case(s) referred to in decision(s):
Blenkinsop v Blenkinsop Nominees Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Blenkinsop Family Trust [2015] WASC 463
Cadwallender v Public Trustee [2003] WASC 72
Elovalis v Elovalis [2008] WASCA 141
Morris v Zanki (1997) 18 WAR 260
Ngarluma Aboriginal Corporation RMTBC v The Attorney General of Western Australia [2014] WASC 245
Wood v Public Trustee (1995) 16 WAR 58
KENNETH MARTIN J:
Mr Sang Huan Gwon is 38 years of age. Sadly, on 24 February 2014, he was badly injured when he was involved in a very serious motor vehicle accident on Bannister Road in Canning Vale. Mr Gwon was riding his motor scooter when he was hit by a motor vehicle he alleges was negligently driven by another driver.
There are proceedings pending in the District Court of Western Australia (CIV 220 of 2017) commenced in January 2017 by Mr Webb as the next friend of Mr Gwon. Mr Webb was appointed by the State Administrative Tribunal (SAT) on 14 November 2016 as Mr Gwon's limited administrator. Mr Webb's functions include seeking legal advice on behalf of Mr Gwon about his motor vehicle accident, bringing and defending action suits and other proceedings in his name and, if necessary, to settle those matters and make any associated application or compromise of Mr Gwon's claim in the District Court and to do all other matters incidental thereto.
From materials provided to me upon the present application, liability is not an issue in the District Court proceedings on the current state of the pleadings in that litigation. It would appear that the Insurance Commission of Western Australia (ICWA), the statutory insurer for the defendant, admitted in those proceedings that the defendant's negligent driving caused the accident (see defence filed in District Court action CIV 220 of 2017 on 15 May 2017, appended as SYY 2 at page…
Continue reading Re Trustees Act 1962 (WA)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re Trustees Act 1962 (WA) [2018] WASC 127
- Case
- [2018] WASC 127
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the Supreme Court had the power to order the payment of money to a private trustee corporation under the provisions of the Trustees Act 1962 (WA), and whether the court could order the payment of an interim payment made to the interim trustee by the plaintiff in the personal injury proceeding. The court had to determine whether the private trustee corporation was an appropriate recipient of the payment and whether the Supreme Court could intervene in the personal injury proceeding to order the payment.
The court found that the Supreme Court had the power to order payment to a private trustee corporation under the Trustees Act 1962 (WA) and that the private trustee corporation was an appropriate recipient of the payment. The court held that the Supreme Court could intervene in the personal injury proceeding to order the payment of the interim payment made to the interim trustee by the plaintiff. The court ordered that the appellants, the public trustees, pay the respondent, the private trustee corporation, an amount equal to the interim payment already made by the respondent to the plaintiff. The court found that the private trustee corporation was an appropriate recipient of the payment and that the Supreme Court could intervene in the personal injury proceeding to order the payment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.