Re Tkacz; Ex parte Tkacz
Case
•
[2006] WASC 315
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Tkacz; Ex parte Tkacz [2006] WASC 315
[2006] WASC 315
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Full Bench of the Supreme Court of Western Australia, Martin CJ, Murray J and Templeman J, was asked to decide whether Michael Tkacz should be admitted to practice in Western Australia as a legal practitioner. Mr Tkacz had been convicted of a criminal offence in 1997, six years before he commenced his legal studies, and had been admitted to practice in New South Wales in 2006. He applied to be admitted in Western Australia under the mutual recognition legislation. The Court held that the mutual recognition legislation did not compel the Court to admit a person who had been admitted in another jurisdiction. The Court's inherent power to determine whether a person was fit and proper to be admitted to practice was not curtailed by the mutual recognition legislation, and the Court exercised its discretion to admit Mr Tkacz to practice in Western Australia.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Professional Regulation
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Character and Fitness
-
Mutual Recognition
-
Inherent Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Re Tkacz; Ex parte Tkacz [2006] WASC 315
Most Recent Citation
Re Chambers [2021] WASC 196
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Agapis v A Deputy President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal at Perth & Ors; Agapis v A Justice of the Federal Court of Australia at Perth & Ors
[2015] HCATrans 246
Prothonotary v Comeskey
[2018] NSWCA 18
Abdou and Victorian Building Authority
[2020] AATA 2637
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Tkacz v The State of Western Australia
[2005] WASCA 108
Gypsy Jokers Motorcycle Club Inc v Commissioner of Police
[2007] WASCA 49
Smith v New South Wales Bar Association
[1992] HCA 36