SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Rodgers deceased, Re [2001] QSC 282 PARTIES: In the will of FLORENCE STUART RODGERS deceased
CHERYL ANN RIETHMULLER and GARY RIETHMULLER
(applicants)v
JANICE MARGARET BALLARD
(first respondent)
and
TODD ANTHONY BALLARD
(second respondent)
and
JASON ANDREW BALLARD
(third respondent)FILE NO: 5424 of 2001 DIVISION: Trial Division DELIVERED ON: 6 August 2001 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARING DATE: 16 July 2001 JUDGE: Mullins J ORDER: 1. It is declared that on the true construction of the last will of Florence Stuart Rodgers deceased ("deceased") dated 13 March 1996 the gift "To Todd Anthony Ballard any money that is in Commonwealth bank" is a gift of the money remaining in the Commonwealth Bank to the credit of the deceased after payment of funeral, testamentary and administration expenses to the extent which they exceed the amount of her residuary estate and after payment of the pecuniary legacies given under the said will of the deceased.
2. It is ordered that the applicants' costs of the application be paid from the estate of the deceased on an indemnity basis.
CATCHWORDS: SUCCESSION – WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION – Construction and effect of testamentary dispositions – nature of gift – whether intended as a specific bequest or residuary disposition – whether there was a contrary intention for payment of debts for purpose of s 59(3) Succession Act 1981 – whether there was a contrary intention for payment of pecuniary legacies for purpose of s 60 Succession Act 1981.
Succession Act 1981, s 55, s 59, s 60
Doe v Hiscocks (1839) 5 M&W 363; 151 ER 154
Franguescos v Shaw [1977] 1 NSWLR 660Re Shaw deceased [1955] St R Qd 284
COUNSEL: LA Stephens for the applicants The first respondent in person
The second respondent in person
The third respondent in personSOLICITORS: SW Ungerer for the applicants
MULLINS J: On 18 June 2001 Cheryl Ann Riethmuller and Gary Riethmuller ("the applicants") applied for probate of the will of the late Mrs Florence Stuart Rodgers who died on 30 April 2001. On the same date the applicants applied for a number of orders in relation to the proving and/or construction of Mrs Rodgers' will which is dated 13 March 1996.
The applicant Mrs Riethmuller is a niece of Mrs Rodgers. Mrs Rodgers was survived by her only daughter Janice Margaret Ballard ("the first respondent"). The first respondent has two sons Todd Anthony Ballard ("the second respondent") and Jason Andrew Ballard ("the third respondent"). The respondents appeared at the hearing of the application, but did not oppose the orders sought by the applicants.
The application was argued before me by Mr Stephens of Counsel on the basis that I had to consider the granting of probate in addition to the construction of the will. I reserved my decision. When looking at the file in connection with considering my decision, it became apparent that probate of Mrs Rodgers' will was granted by the registrar on 19 June 2001. The probate was…
Continue reading Re Rodgers deceased
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re Rodgers deceased [2001] QSC 282
- Case
- [2001] QSC 282
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was the interpretation of the phrase "To Todd Anthony Ballard any money that is in Commonwealth bank" within the context of the will. The court had to ascertain whether this provision constituted a specific bequest or a residuary gift, given that the will contained other pecuniary legacies and potentially conflicting provisions. The court also considered whether there was any intention expressed in the will that would lead to the payment of debts or pecuniary legacies taking precedence over the gift to Ballard. This involved a detailed analysis of the will's language, structure, and the surrounding circumstances.
In resolving the dispute, the court examined the entire will to determine the testator's intent. It found that the gift to Ballard was not a specific bequest but rather a residuary gift, intended to cover any remaining funds in the Commonwealth Bank after the payment of funeral, testamentary, and administration expenses, and the pecuniary legacies specified in the will. The court concluded that there was no evidence of a contrary intention that would require the payment of debts or pecuniary legacies to take precedence over the gift to Ballard. Consequently, the court declared that the gift to Ballard was a residuary gift, subject to the prior payment of specified expenses and legacies.
The court ordered that Todd Anthony Ballard was entitled to receive the remaining funds in the Commonwealth Bank, after deducting funeral, testamentary, and administration expenses, as well as the pecuniary legacies given under the will. Additionally, the court ordered that the applicants' costs of the application be paid from the estate of the deceased on an indemnity basis.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. It is declared that on the true construction of the last will of Florence Stuart Rodgers deceased ("deceased") dated 13 March 1996 the gift "To Todd Anthony Ballard any money that is in Commonwealth bank" is a gift of the money remaining in the Commonwealth Bank to the credit of the deceased after payment of funeral, testamentary and administration expenses to the extent which they exceed the amount of her residuary estate and after payment of the pecuniary legacies given under the said will of the deceased.
2. It is ordered that the applicants' costs of the application be paid from the estate of the deceased on an indemnity basis.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.