FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| RE: QUINN | [2016] FamCA 617 |
| FAMILY LAW – MEDICAL PROCEDURES – Childhood gender dysphoria –Where the child is 15 years of age – Consideration of whether the child is Gillick competent. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 67ZC |
| Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112 Re Jamie (2013) FLC 93-547 |
| APPLICANTS: | The Mother and the Father |
| RESPONDENT: | The Secretary, relevant Government Department |
FILE NUMBER: By Court Order File Number is suppressed
| DATE DELIVERED: | 29 July 2016 |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Rees J |
| HEARING DATE: | 26 July 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
By Court Order the names of counsel and solicitors have been suppressed
Orders
IT IS DECLARED
That the child Quinn, who was born on … 2001 is competent to consent to male chest reconstruction surgery for the purpose of treatment of Gender Dysphoria in Adolescents and Adults in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013) (“DSM-5”).
IT IS ORDERED
That the full name of Quinn, his family members, his hospital, the Independent Children’s Lawyer, his medical practitioners, his school, this Court’s file number, the State of Australia in which the proceedings were initiated, the name of Quinn’s parents’ lawyers, and any other fact or matter that may identify Quinn, shall not be published in any way, and only anonymised Reasons for Judgment and Orders (with cover-sheets excluding the registry, file number, and lawyers’ names and details, as well as the parties’ real names) shall be released by the Court to non-parties without further contrary order of a Judge, it being noted that each party shall be handed one full copy of these orders with the relevant details included, to enable their execution, and one cover-sheet of Reasons for Judgment that includes the file number and lawyers’ names.
That no person shall be permitted to search the Court file in this matter without first obtaining the leave of a Judge.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Re: Quinn has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA |
FILE NUMBER: By Court Order File Number is suppressed
| The Mother and the Father |
Applicants
And
| The Secretary, relevant Government Department |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The Father and the Mother (“the applicants”) are the parents of Quinn, born in 2001. Quinn identifies as male and wishes to have a bilateral mastectomy, colloquially referred to as “top surgery”. The applicants ask the Court to determine that Quinn is competent to authorise the surgery.
In the alternate, the applicants ask the Court to order that they can authorise the procedure.
In these reasons, reference is made to guidelines published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, Standards of Care (“the WPATH Guidelines”).
The guidelines set out the generally accepted interventions as follows:
1. Fully reversible interventions. These involve the use of GnRH analogues to suppress oestrogen or testosterone production and consequently delay the physical changes of…
Continue reading Re: Quinn
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re: Quinn [2016] FamCA 617
- Case
- [2016] FamCA 617
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was the competence of a minor to consent to a significant medical procedure, specifically surgery related to gender affirmation. This required an assessment of Quinn's maturity, understanding, and ability to make an informed decision regarding the proposed treatment, notwithstanding his age.
Rees J applied principles of common law concerning the capacity of minors to consent to medical treatment. The Court considered the established legal test, which focuses on the minor's understanding and intelligence rather than their age. Having assessed Quinn's capacity, the Court declared that Quinn was competent to consent to the surgery. The Court also made extensive orders to protect Quinn's privacy, prohibiting the publication of any identifying details and restricting access to the court file.
Orders
Orders of the court
IT IS DECLARED
1.
That the child Quinn, who was born on … 2001 is competent to consent to male chest reconstruction surgery for the purpose of treatment of Gender Dysphoria in Adolescents and Adults in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013) (“DSM-5”).
IT IS ORDERED
2.
That the full name of Quinn, his family members, his hospital, the Independent Children’s Lawyer, his medical practitioners, his school, this Court’s file number, the State of Australia in which the proceedings were initiated, the name of Quinn’s parents’ lawyers, and any other fact or matter that may identify Quinn, shall not be published in any way, and only anonymised Reasons for Judgment and Orders (with cover-sheets excluding the registry, file number, and lawyers’ names and details, as well as the parties’ real names) shall be released by the Court to non-parties without further contrary order of a Judge, it being noted that each party shall be handed one full copy of these orders with the relevant details included, to enable their execution, and one cover-sheet of Reasons for Judgment that includes the file number and lawyers’ names.
3.
That no person shall be permitted to search the Court file in this matter without first obtaining the leave of a Judge.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.