Re Queensland Outside School Hours Care Enterprise Agreement (No. 2)

[2025] QIRC 31

QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

CITATION:

Re Queensland Outside School Hours Care Enterprise Agreement (No. 2) [2025] QIRC 031

PARTIES:

MacGregor State School Parents & Citizens Association

AND

United Workers' Union, Industrial Union of Employees, Queensland

AND

The other parties listed in Schedule 1

CASE NO.:

CB/2024/79

PROCEEDING:

Application for certification of an agreement

DELIVERED ON:

4 February 2025

HEARING DATE: 

On the papers

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

MEMBER:

Merrell DP

ORDER:

The application filed on 22 November 2024 by the MacGregor State School Parents & Citizens Association, for the certification of the Queensland Outside School Hours Care Enterprise Agreement, is refused.

CATCHWORDS:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – QUEENSLAND – AGREEMENTS – CERTIFICATION OR APPROVAL – application for certification of a proposed bargaining instrument under ch 4, pt 5 of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 – requirements for certification – whether the proposed bargaining instrument, and supporting material and submissions, require the Commission to grant the application or require the Commission to refuse the application – supporting material and submissions not sufficient for the Commission to make a decision under ch 4, pt 5 of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 – persons who will be covered by the proposed bargaining instrument given the opportunity to take action that may be necessary to enable the Commission to grant the application – action subsequently taken by certain persons who will be covered by the proposed bargaining instrument in the form of filing further affidavit material and submissions – Commission not satisfied the requirements for granting the application, as contained in ch 4, pt 5, div 2, sub-div 2 are met – application for certification of the proposed bargaining instrument refused

LEGISLATION:

Industrial Relations Act 2016, s 168, s 169, s 170, s 171, s 189, s 193, s 194, s 195, s 196, s 197, and s 201

CASES:

Re Queensland Outside School Hours Care Enterprise Agreement [2024] QIRC 302

Reasons for Decision

Introduction

1. These reasons assume familiarity with the decision in Re Queensland Outside School Hours Care Enterprise Agreement ('Principal Decision').[1] These reasons are to be read with the reasons given in the Principal Decision. Unless otherwise indicated, any definitions used in the Principal Decision are used in these reasons. 

   [1][2024] QIRC 302 ('Principal Decision').

2. By the reasons I gave in the Principal Decision:

   ·I did not grant, and did not refuse, the MacGregor State School P&C's application to certify the proposed bargaining instrument;[2]

   ·I drew to the attention of the parties to the proposed bargaining instrument the matters relevant to my decision not to grant and not to refuse the MacGregor State School P&C's application;[3] and

   ·pursuant to s 194(1) of the IR Act, I gave the persons who will be covered by the proposed bargaining instrument until Friday, 24 January 2025 to take action that may be necessary to enable the Commission to grant the MacGregor State School P&C's application.[4]

   [2] Ibid [30].

   [3] Ibid [33]-[42].

   [4] Ibid [43].

3. The proposed bargaining instrument is a multi-employer agreement within the meaning of s 168 of the IR Act.

4. The parties to the proposed bargaining instrument, as set out in the application filed by  MacGregor State School P&C on 22 November 2024, are:

   ·the MacGregor State School P&C;

   ·the '… United Workers Union'; and

   ·the forty-one other State School P&Cs that are listed in Schedule 1 to these reasons for decision.

5. On 24 January 2025, the following material was filed:

   ·an affidavit of Mr Jack Alexander Mayfosh Johnson, an Industrial Officer of the United Workers' Union affirmed on 23 January 2025;

   ·an affidavit of Ms Amanda Jane Lowe, Business Operations Manager of the MacGregor State School P&C affirmed on 23 January 2025;

   ·Ms Lowe's affidavit included, as an exhibit, an affidavit of   Ms Kylie-Anne Brannelly, the Chief Executive Officer of QCAN affirmed on 22 January 2025; and

   ·written submissions dated 24 January 2025, filed on behalf of the MacGregor State School P&C in support of the certification of the proposed bargaining instrument.

6. The MacGregor State School P&C's submissions covered the following discrete matters in respect of its application to certify the proposed bargaining instrument:

   ·whether there was compliance with s 169, s 170 and s 197 of the IR Act;

   ·whether there was compliance with s 196 of the IR Act;

   ·whether there was compliance with s 201(a) of the IR Act; and

   ·whether there was compliance with ch 4, pt 5, div 2, sub-div 3 of the IR Act.

7. The question for my determination is whether, in light of the above material filed by the parties, I must grant the MacGregor State School P&C's application and certify the proposed bargaining instrument.

8. For the reasons that follow, I must refuse to grant the MacGregor State School P&C's application.

   The relevant provisions of the Industrial Relations Act 2016

9. Chapter 4 of the IR Act deals with collective bargaining. Part 5 of that chapter deals with certifying agreements and making bargaining awards.

10. Division 1 of pt 5 deals with making and hearing applications for the certification of agreements.

11. Division 2 of pt 5 deals with deciding applications for the certification of agreements. Sub-division 1 of div 2 is headed 'Commission's decision on applications' and contains s 193 which provides:

    193      Requirements for commission’s decision

    (1)The commission must grant a part 5 application if–

    (a)each requirement under subdivision 2 is satisfied for the application; and

    (b) the commission is not required under subdivision 3 to refuse to grant the application.

    (2)     If subsection (1) does not apply, the commission must refuse to grant the application.

    (3)     Subsection (2) applies subject to section 194.

12. Sub-division 2 of div 2 is headed 'Requirements for granting applications' and relevantly contains ss 195 to 197 which provide:

    195      Compliance with bargaining process requirements

    The commission must be satisfied that–

    (a) the things required by sections 169, 171 and 172 were done, and, in particular, the terms of the proposed bargaining instrument were explained in a way that was appropriate having regard to the persons’ particular circumstances and needs; and

    (b)    the employer did not coerce, or attempt to coerce, an employee–

    (i) not to make a request mentioned in section 171(2)(c); or

    (ii) to withdraw the request.

    196      Proposed bargaining instrument to be in writing and signed by parties

    (1) The commission must be satisfied the proposed bargaining instrument–

    (a)is in writing; and

    (b) is signed by or for all the parties.

    (2) Subsection (1)(b) does not apply if the commission is satisfied, in the particular circumstances, that–

    (a) although the proposed bargaining instrument has not been signed by or for all the parties, all parties have agreed on the terms of the instrument; and

    (b) the part 5 application was made within a reasonable time after the instrument was approved by a valid majority of the relevant employees at the time in a

    properly conducted ballot.

    (3) For subsection (2), in deciding whether all parties have agreed on the terms of the proposed bargaining instrument, the commission may consider–

    (a)whether the parties negotiated in good faith as required under section 173; and

    (b)      any other evidence supporting or not supporting the alleged agreement.

    197      Approval by relevant employees

    The commission must be satisfied a valid majority of the relevant employees employed at the time approved the proposed bargaining instrument.

1. Sections 169, 170 and 171 are contained in ch 4, pt 2 of the IR Act ('Collective bargaining process') and relevantly provide:

   169      Notice of intention to bargain

   (1) This section applies if a person (the proposer) proposes to negotiate with a view to a bargaining instrument being made.

   (2) The proposer must give each of the following persons a written notice (a notice of intention) of the proposer’s  intention to start negotiating–

   (a) the other proposed parties to the negotiations;

   (b) if the negotiations relate to a project agreement– all relevant employee organisations and the commission.

   (3) The proposer must give the notice of intention at least 14 days before the negotiations are proposed to start.

   (4) If an existing bargaining instrument or arbitration determination applies to the parties, the proposer must not give the notice of intention more than 6 months before the nominal expiry date.

   (5) Subsection (4) applies subject to the provisions of the bargaining instrument.

   170      Notice of intention to be party to bargaining

   (1) This section applies if–

   (a) a proposer gives a notice of intention; and

   (b) the negotiations–

   (i)     relate to a project agreement; or

   (ii)    involve a multi-employer agreement; and

   (c) a person who receives the notice of intention wants to be a party to the negotiations; and

   (d) for negotiations relating to a project–the person mentioned in paragraph (c) is an organisation.

   (2) The person must give written notice of the person’s intention to be a party to the negotiations to–

   (a) the proposer; and

   (b) the commission.

   (3) A notice under subsection (2) must be given within 21 days after the person receives the notice of intention.

   (4) An agreement, or application under part 5 for the making of a bargaining award, may only be made within the period mentioned in subsection (3) if the other proposed parties to the negotiations, and all relevant employee organisations, have given a notice under subsection (2).

   171      Proposed bargaining instrument to be given to employees for approval

   (1) This section applies if, during negotiations under this chapter, the negotiating parties propose to–

   (a) make a certified agreement, other than an excluded instrument; or

   (b) seek the making of a bargaining award.

   (2)     The employer must take reasonable steps to ensure–

   (a) each relevant employee has, or has ready access to, the proposed bargaining instrument or a copy of the proposed instrument at least 14 days before the day the relevant employees are asked to approve the proposed instrument; and

   (b) the terms of the proposed instrument, including the procedures for preventing and settling disputes, and the effect of the terms are explained to each relevant

   employee before approval is given; and

   (c) for an agreement with employees–each relevant employee is informed that the employee may ask a relevant employee organisation of which the employee is a member to represent the employee in negotiating with the employer about the agreement.

   Note—

   See section 242 in relation to certificates about requested representation.

   (3) The employer must not ask relevant employees to approve the proposed instrument until 21 days after the later of the following–

   (a)the day the notice of intention for the negotiations was given;

   (b) the day a scope order in relation to the proposed instrument came into effect.

   The submissions of the MacGregor State School P&C

   Sections 169, 170 and s 197 of the Industrial Relations Act 2016

2. In respect of ss 169, 170 and 197 of the IR Act, the MacGregor State School P&C submits:

   ·on 23 September 2024, it sent, as the proposer,  a written notice of intention to bargain to '… all P&C Associations in Queensland';

   ·in accordance with s 170(3) of the IR Act, a person wanting to be a party to the negotiations had to give notice to the proposer and to the Commission by 14 October 2024;

   ·the following twenty-two P&Cs (set out in paragraph 7 of the MacGregor State School P&C's submissions) complied with the requirements of s 170(3) of the IR Act:

   -        Belmont State School P&C;

   -        Coolum State School P&C;

   -        Cooroy State School P&C;

   -        Currajong State School P&C;

   -        Eatons Hill State School P&C;

   -        Glenvale State School P&C;

   -        Ipswich East State School P&C;

   -        Jindalee State School P&C;

   -        Jones Hill State School P&C;

   -        Junction Park State School P&C;

   -        Kelvin Grove State College P&C;

   -        Kuluin State School P&C;

   -        Mooloolaba State School P&C;

   -        Morningside State School P&C;

   -        Newtown State School P&C;

   -        Pacific Paradise State School P&C;

   -        Samford State School P&C;

   -        Springwood Road State School P&C;

   -        Sunnybank Hills State School P&C;

   -        The Willows State School P&C;

   -        Wellers Hill State School P&C; and

   -        Wilston State School P&C; and

   ·it has been discovered that the following eighteen P&Cs (set out in paragraph 8 of the MacGregor State School P&C's submissions) '…while advising of their intention to be a party to the negotiations and the Proposed Agreement, did not give written notice in accordance with s 170(3), despite being named as a party to the Proposed Agreement';

   -        Albany Hills State School P&C;

   -        Blair State School P&C;

   -        Bulimba State School P&C;

   -        Camp Hill State School P&C;

   -        Chancellor State College P&C;

   -        Freshwater State School P&C;

   -        Geebung State School P&C;

   -        Middle Park State School P&C;

   -        McDowall State School P&C;

   -        Moggill State School P&C;

   -        Mundingburra State School P&C;

   -        Payne Road State School P&C;

   -        Rochedale State School P&C;

   -        Shorncliffe State School P&C;

   -        Undurba State School P&C;

   -        Weir State School P&C;

   -        West End State School P&C; and

   -        Woree State School P&C.[5]

   [5] The submissions of the MacGregor State School P&C filed on 24 January 2025, paras. 5 to 8.

3. In the application filed on 22 November 2024 by the MacGregor State School P&C for the certification of the proposed bargaining instrument, Appendix A to the proposed bargaining instrument listed the employers covered by it. One employer was the Townsville Central State School P&C. The Townsville Central State School P&C is not mentioned in the submissions or in any of the affidavit material filed on 24 January 2025.

4. Ms Lowe's affidavit:

   ·contains evidence that the twenty-two P&Cs, set out in paragraph 7 of the MacGregor State School P&C's submissions, provided a written notice to the MacGregor State School P&C, as the proposer of the negotiations, that in accordance with s 170(3) of the IR Act, each of them wanted to be a party to the negotiations for the proposed bargaining instrument; and

   ·contains no evidence that the eighteen P&Cs, set out in paragraph 8 of the MacGregor State School P&C's submissions, gave written notice to the MacGregor State School P&C, as the proposer of the negotiations, in accordance with s 170(3) of the IR Act; and

   ·contains no evidence how the eighteen P&Cs, set out in paragraph 8 of the MacGregor State School P&C's submissions, advised of their intention to be a party to the negotiations and the proposed bargaining instrument.

5. The evidence of Ms Brannelly is that:

   ·between 1 November 2024 and 12 November 2024, she received an email from each of the twenty-two P&Cs, set out in paragraph 7 of MacGregor State School P&C's submissions, plus an email from the MacGregor State School P&C, which included or attached '… a list of all employees eligible to vote' on the proposed bargaining instrument, employed by each of those twenty-three P&Cs;

   ·while she did not exhibit the emails referred to in the dot point immediately above, and provided no explanation why the emails to which she referred were not exhibited to her affidavit, she was able to provide copies '… on request';

   ·the '… total number of employees eligible to vote on the Proposed Agreement was 598'; and

   ·on 12 November 2024, she '… provided TrueVote, the ballot agent for the vote to approve the Proposed Agreement, with a list of the employees provided by each service' as set out in her affidavit.

6. Ms Brannelly then gives the following evidence:

   39.     On 13 November 2024, I received a Ballot Report from TrueVote dated 13 November 2024, which states that 840 employees voted (out of 1061), and that of the 840 employees that voted, 839 voted to approve the Proposed Agreement.

7. The TrueVote Ballot report is exhibited to Ms Brannelly's affidavit.

8. Ms Brannelly does not give any evidence, in light of her evidence about the information she provided to TrueVote, how TrueVote came to give ballots to 1061 employees as recorded in its Ballot Report. 

9. The MacGregor State School P&C submits:

   9.     It is submitted that the Proposed Agreement should be certified to only include the parties in paragraph 7. If the Proposed Agreement is certified, it is anticipated that the parties in paragraph 8, along with a number of additional parties, will make an immediate application to vary the certified agreement to be joined as parties to the certified agreement.

   10.   The total number of employees eligible to vote from the parties in paragraph 7 only, plus MacGregor State School Parents & Citizens Association as the proposer, is 598.

   11.   The total voter roll for the ballot, which included all employees of the parties in paragraphs 7 and 8, was 1061.

   12.   Of the total voter roll, 840 voters responded to the ballot notification, with 839 voting in favour of the agreement.

   13.   In the unlikely event that all 222 of the voters that did not respond or voted no were from the eligible parties in paragraph 7, 376 voted in favour to approve the Proposed Agreement. This remains a clear majority of employees.

   14.   In those circumstances, we submit that the Commission can be satisfied that a majority of employees voted to approve the Proposed Agreement.

10. I cannot accept these submissions.

11. The application filed by the MacGregor State School P&C on 22 November 2024 was made on the basis that the employer parties to the proposed multi-employer certified agreement were the forty-two P&Cs listed in Appendix A to the proposed bargaining instrument. Having regard to Ms Brannelly's affidavit, it seems to be the case, although it is not explicit, that the relevant employees of all the forty-two P&Cs listed in Appendix A were given an opportunity to vote to approve it.

12. The MacGregor State School P&C, by its submissions filed on 24 January 2025, now presses the Commission to grant its application to certify the proposed bargaining instrument on a completely different basis; namely, that the proposed bargaining instrument would only cover the twenty-three P&Cs referred to in Ms Lowe's affidavit and in Ms Brannelly's affidavit.

13. That is to say, I am being asked to grant an application to certify a proposed bargaining instrument:

    ·that is different to that which is the subject of the application made under s 189 of the IR Act; and

    ·that is different for which approval of the relevant employees was sought as required by s 171(2) and (3) of the IR Act.

14. It is true that a proposed bargaining instrument may be amended after the steps contained in ss 171(2) and (3) of the IR Act occur, but only where those steps are repeated for the instrument as amended.[6]

    [6] Industrial Relations Act 2016, s 171(6).

15. Amendments, that do not require the repeating of the steps contained in s 171(2) and (3) of the IR Act, can be made where the Commission is satisfied that the proposed bargaining instrument was amended only for a formal or clerical reason (such as those I identified in paragraph [42] of the Principal Decision), or where the Commission is satisfied that the proposed bargaining instrument is amended in another way that does not adversely affect a relevant employee's interests.[7] These are not the circumstances now described by the MacGregor State School P&C in its submissions.  

    [7] Industrial Relations Act 2016, s 171(8).

1. The MacGregor State School P&C does not address whether, at this point in time, namely, after a ballot where it seems a valid majority of the relevant employees of the forty-two P&Cs approved the proposed agreement, its application is capable of approval under the IR Act by disregarding eighteen (or taking into account the Townsville Central State School P&C, nineteen) of the P&Cs who were listed in Appendix A. I have not been taken to any provision in the IR Act that allows for a proposed bargaining instrument to be approved on the basis now pressed by the MacGregor State School P&C.

2. The opportunity the Commission was required to give to the parties to the proposed bargaining instrument, pursuant to s 194(1) of the IR Act, was to take action that may be necessary to enable me to grant the application to certify the proposed bargaining instrument the subject of the application made by the MacGregor State School P&C on 22 November 2024. The opportunity was not given so that I could grant approval of a different multi-employer proposed bargaining instrument.

3. There is nothing in the evidence of Mr Johnson, Ms Lowe and Ms Brannelly that satisfies me that the things required to be done, by s 171(2) of the IR Act, were done in respect of all the relevant employees of the forty-two P&Cs the subject of the application filed on 22 November 2024. Mr Johnson's evidence is vague about the identity of the persons who attended the information meeting on 5 November 2024 to which he refers. Ms Lowe's evidence does not deal with matters relevant to s 171 of the IR Act. Ms Brannelly's evidence, at paragraph 13 of her affidavit, about her facilitation of an information session on 5 November 2024, is vague about who actually attended and what was actually discussed.

4. On the material before me, the only conclusion to be drawn as to why the MacGregor State School P&C has nominated the twenty-two P&Cs referred to in its submissions is because those P&Cs gave a written notice to it, under s 170(2) of the IR Act, that they wanted to be a party to the negotiations.

5. In the end, the situation is this.

6. One, there is no evidence in the affidavits of Mr Johnson, Ms Lowe and Ms Brannelly that satisfies me that the things required to be done, by s 171(2) the IR Act, were done in respect of the relevant employees of the forty-two P&Cs the subject of the application filed by the MacGregor State School P&C on 22 November 2024.

7. Two, for the reasons I have given, I cannot approve the proposed agreement on the different basis as now pressed by the MacGregor State School P&C, namely, that it only covers twenty-three of the forty-two P&Cs originally the subject of the application filed by the MacGregor State School P&C on 22 November 2024.

   Section 196 of the Industrial Relations Act 2016

8. The MacGregor State School P&C submits:

   15.      The Proposed Agreement is not signed by or for all parties. Accordingly, the Commission must be satisfied that all parties have agreed on the terms of the instrument.

   16.      All parties had the opportunity for input into the terms of the Proposed Agreement throughout the bargaining and information process and those terms were agreed.

   17.      Additionally, at the Hearing held in the Commission on 16 December 2024, attending parties were given the opportunity to raise any concerns they had with the Proposed Agreement. No party raised issue with the terms of the Proposed Agreement.

9. A number of things arise from these submissions.

10. First, it is not explained why the proposed bargaining instrument was not signed by or for any party.

11. Secondly, there is no evidence in the affidavits of Ms Lowe and Ms Brannelly that satisfies me that each one of the forty-two P&C employer parties to the proposed bargaining instrument agree to its terms.

12. Thirdly, even assuming that there was probative evidence that all '… parties had the opportunity for input into the terms of the Proposed Agreement throughout the bargaining and information process' that of itself is not evidence upon which I can be satisfied each of the forty-two employer parties agree to the terms of the proposed bargaining instrument.

13. Fourthly, even on the basis of the different case now pressed by the MacGregor State School P&C, there is no evidence in the affidavits of Ms Lowe and Ms Brannelly that satisfies me that each one of the twenty-two P&C employer parties, referred to in paragraph 7 of its submissions, agree to the terms of the proposed bargaining instrument.

14. In particular, in respect of paragraph 17 of the MacGregor State School P&C's submissions, at the hearing on 16 December 2024 there was no personal or telephone appearance from ten of the forty-two P&Cs listed as employers in Appendix A of the proposed bargaining instrument, namely:

    ·Chancellor State College P&C;

    ·Jones Hill State School P&C;

    ·Kelvin Grove State College P&C;

    ·Moggill State School P&C;

    ·Mundingburra State School P&C;

    ·Pacific Paradise State School P&C;

    ·Rochedale State School P&C;

    ·Townsville Central State School P&C;

    ·Undurba State School P&C; and

    ·Woree State School P&C.[8]  

    [8] T 1-24, ll 13-19. Although the Chancellor State College P&C is not listed in this transcript reference, there was no appearance by that employer at the hearing on 16 December 2024.

15. The Jones Hill State School P&C, the Kelvin Grove Sate College P&C and the Pacific Paradise State School P&C are part of the group of twenty-two P&Cs listed in paragraph 7 of the submissions of the MacGregor State School P&C. That is, they are said to be employers in respect of which the MacGregor State School P&C now submits that I should certify the proposed bargaining instrument, but with a different group of employers being covered. These three P&Cs could not inferentially indicate their agreement to the terms of the proposed agreement when they did not attend the hearing in any capacity.

16. For these reasons, in the absence of any party signing the proposed agreement or having the proposed agreement signed for them, I am not satisfied that each of the forty-two employer parties agree to the terms of the proposed bargaining instrument within the meaning of s 196(2) of the IR Act.

    Other matters

17. Given my conclusions above, it is unnecessary to consider the other submissions that were made.

    Conclusion

18. For the reasons I have given, pursuant to s 193(2) of the IR Act, I must refuse to grant the MacGregor State School P&C's application.

19. I understand why the proposed bargaining instrument was the subject of an application for certification under ch 4 of the IR Act. This is because Commonwealth legislation makes available grant funding, in the form of worker retention payments for low-paid employees who provide outside school hours care, provided there is an industrial instrument in place for the provision of those payments to such employees.

20. I accept that there is a sound reason behind the application for the approval of such a certified agreement. That, however, does not mean that I can disregard the relevant provisions of the IR Act.

    Order

21. I make the following order:

    The application filed on 22 November 2024 by the MacGregor State School Parents & Citizens Association, for the certification of the Queensland Outside School Hours Care Enterprise Agreement, is refused.

Schedule 1

1.Albany Hills State School Parents & Citizens Association

2.Belmont State School Parents & Citizens Association

3.Blair State School Parents & Citizens Association

4.Bulimba State School Parents & Citizens Association

5.Camp Hill State School Parents & Citizens Association

6.Chancellor State College Parents & Citizens Association

7.Coolum State School Parents & Citizens Association

8.Cooroy State School Parents & Citizens Association

9.Currajong State School Parents & Citizens Association

10.Eatons Hill State School Parents & Citizens Association

11.Freshwater State School Parents & Citizens Association

12.Undurba State School Parents & Citizens Association

13.Geebung State School Parents & Citizens Association

14.Glenvale State School Parents & Citizens Association

15.Ipswich East State School Parents & Citizens Association

16.Jindalee State School Parents & Citizens Association

17.Jones Hill State School Parents & Citizens Association

18.Junction Park State School Parents & Citizens Association

19.Kelvin Grove State College Parents & Citizens Association

20.Shorncliffe State School Parents & Citizens Association

21.Kuluin State School Parents & Citizens Association

22.Middle Park State School Parents & Citizens Association

23.McDowall State School Parents & Citizens Association

24.Moggill State School Parents & Citizens Association

25.Mooloolaba State School Parents & Citizens Association

26.Morningside State School Parents & Citizens Association

27.Mundingburra State School Parents & Citizens Association

28.Newtown State School Parents & Citizens Association

29.Pacific Paradise State School Parents & Citizens Association

30.Payne Road State School Parents & Citizens Association

31.Rochedale State School Parents & Citizens Association

32.Samford State School Parents & Citizens Association

33.Springwood Road State School Parents & Citizens Association

34.Sunnybank Hills State School Parents & Citizens Association

35.The Willows State School Parents & Citizens Association

36.Townsville Central State School Parents & Citizens Association

37.Weir State School Parents & Citizens Association

38.Wellers Hill State School Parents & Citizens Association

39.West End State School Parents & Citizens Association

40.Wilston State School Parents & Citizens Association

41.Woree State School Parents & Citizens Association