Re Patrick John Walker, Commissioner for Fair Trading;

Case [2003] WASC 252


RE PATRICK JOHN WALKER, COMMISSIONER FOR FAIR TRADING; EX PARTE FREMANTLE ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED [2003] WASC 252



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2003] WASC 252
Case No:CIV:1718/20032 DECEMBER 2003
Coram:PULLIN J17/12/03
11Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Order nisi discharged
A
PDF Version
Parties:FREMANTLE ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED
PATRICK JOHN WALKER, COMMISSIONER FOR FAIR TRADING

Catchwords:

Administrative law
Prerogative writs or orders
Application for writ of certiorari to quash decision of respondent cancelling the incorporation of the applicant
Whether donee of power may act via an agent
Whether agent must act in the name of the donee
Doctrine of administrative necessity

Legislation:

Associations Incorporation Act 1987, s 35, s 36

Case References:

Carltona Ltd v Commissioners of Works [1943] 2 All ER 560
Commonwealth v Rian Financial Services & Developments Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 101
London County Council v Agricultural Food Products Ltd [1955] 2 QB 218
McLean Bros & Rigg Ltd v Grice (1906) 4 CLR 835
Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24
O'Reilly v Commissioners of State Bank of Victoria (1983) 153 CLR 1
Owendale Pty Ltd v Anthony (1967) 117 CLR 539
Re City of Joondalup; Ex parte Mullaloo Progress Association Inc [2003] WASCA 293
Re Plutonic Operations Ltd; Ex parte Roberts [1999] WASCA 133
Re Reference under s 11 of Ombudsman Act 1976 for an Advisory Opinion; Ex parte Director-General of Social Services (1979) 2 ALD 86

David Cheney Pty Ltd v City of Adelaide [1998] SAERDC 476
Director of Public Prosecutions v His Honour Judge Fricke [1993] 1 VR 369
Dooney v Henry (2000) 174 ALR 41
FH Faulding & Co Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 54 FCR 75

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    IN CHAMBERS
CITATION : RE PATRICK JOHN WALKER, COMMISSIONER FOR FAIR TRADING; EX PARTE FREMANTLE ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED [2003] WASC 252 CORAM : PULLIN J HEARD : 2 DECEMBER 2003 DELIVERED : 17 DECEMBER 2003 FILE NO/S : CIV 1718 of 2003 MATTER : Section 35 of the Associations Incorporation Act 1987

    and

    An application for a Writ of Prohibition against PATRICK JOHN WALKER, COMMISSIONER FOR FAIR TRADING
EX PARTE

    FREMANTLE ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED
    Applicant

    AND

    PATRICK JOHN WALKER, COMMISSIONER FOR FAIR TRADING
    Respondent


(Page 2)

Catchwords:

Administrative law - Prerogative writs or orders - Application for writ of certiorari to quash decision of respondent cancelling the incorporation of the applicant - Whether donee of power may act via an agent - Whether agent must act in the name of the donee - Doctrine of administrative necessity




Legislation:

Associations Incorporation Act 1987, s 35, s 36




Result:

Order nisi discharged




Category: A


Representation:


Counsel:


    Applicant : Mr M J Hawkins
    Respondent : Mr A R Beech


Solicitors:

    Applicant : Naveen Pillay
    Respondent : Department of Consumer & Employment Protection



Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Carltona Ltd v Commissioners of Works [1943] 2 All ER 560
Commonwealth…

Continue reading Re Patrick John Walker, Commissioner for Fair Trading;

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Patrick John Walker, Commissioner for Fair Trading; [2003] WASC 252
Case
[2003] WASC 252
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves the Fremantle Islamic Association Incorporated, who sought a writ of certiorari to quash a decision made by the Commissioner for Fair Trading, Patrick John Walker, to cancel the incorporation of the association. The court was required to determine whether the Commissioner could delegate the power to cancel incorporation to an agent and whether the steps taken by the agent were valid. The court considered whether the Commissioner could act via an agent, whether the agent had to act in the name of the Commissioner, and whether the doctrine of administrative necessity applied. The court held that the Commissioner could act via an agent, but the steps taken had to be in the name of the Commissioner. The court found that the agent had acted in the name of the Commissioner, and the decision to cancel the incorporation was valid. The order nisi was discharged.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.