RE PALANDRI LTD; EX PARTE CUSSEN [2008] WASC 68
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2008] WASC 68 | |
| 01/05/2008 | |||
| Case No: | COR:31/2008 | 20 MARCH 2008 | |
| Coram: | MARTIN CJ | 19/03/08 | |
| 8 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Application allowed | ||
| B | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | NEIL ROBERT CUSSEN, GARY PETER DORAN AND JOHN LETHBRIDGE GREIG AS ADMINISTRATORS OF PALANDRI LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 087 787 415) PALANDRI WINE PRODUCTION LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 085 042 879) PALANDRI WINES LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 084 252 488) PALANDRI INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 091 709 769) MARGARET RIVER WINE INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 112 505 692) |
Catchwords: | Application to extend the time in which a meeting of creditors may be convened pursuant to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 439A(6) |
Legislation: | Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 435A, s 439A(4), s 439A(6) |
Case References: | Re Evans and Tate Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed); Ex parte Jones [2007] WASC 235 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- IN CHAMBERS
- (ACN 087 787 415)
PALANDRI WINE PRODUCTION LTD
(ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 085 042 879)
PALANDRI WINES LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 084 252 488)
PALANDRI INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 091 709 769)
MARGARET RIVER WINE INVESTMENTS PTY LTD
(ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 112 505 692)
EX PARTE
NEIL ROBERT CUSSEN, GARY PETER DORAN AND JOHN LETHBRIDGE GREIG AS ADMINISTRATORS OF PALANDRI LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 087 787 415)
PALANDRI WINE PRODUCTION LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 085 042 879)
PALANDRI WINES LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 084 252 488)
PALANDRI INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 091 709 769)
MARGARET RIVER WINE INVESTMENTS PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 112 505 692)
Applicants
Catchwords:
Application to extend the time in which a meeting of creditors may be convened pursuant to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 439A(6)
Legislation:
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 435A, s 439A(4), s 439A(6)
Result:
Application allowed
(Page 3)
Category: B
Representation:
Counsel:
Applicants : Mr D K Skender
Solicitors:
Applicants : McKenzie Moncrieff Lawyers
Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):
Re Evans and Tate Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed); Ex parte Jones [2007] WASC 235
(Page 4)
- MARTIN CJ:
1 (This judgment was delivered extemporaneously on 20 March 2008 and has been edited from the transcript.)
2 The applicants, who are the administrators of five companies which form part of a group that might loosely be described as the 'Palandri Group', apply for an extension of the period within which the second meeting of creditors must be convened. In particular they seek an extension of that time from 4 April 2008 (which is when the meetings would currently have to be held) until 20 May…
Continue reading Re Palandri Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re Palandri Ltd [2008] WASC 68
- Case
- [2008] WASC 68
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court had to address was whether the circumstances justified an extension of the statutory timeframe for convening the creditors' meeting. The liquidator argued that the delay was reasonable given the circumstances, including the need for further investigation and the potential impact on the company's creditors. The court was also required to balance the interests of the creditors against the need for an orderly and fair process in appointing a liquidator and convening the meeting.
The court found that the circumstances did indeed justify an extension of the time for convening the meeting. The Federal Court noted the complexity of the company's financial affairs and the need for thorough investigation before proceeding with the creditors' meeting. The court held that the liquidator's application was reasonable and that granting the extension would not unfairly prejudice any of the parties involved. Consequently, the court allowed the application, granting the requested extension of time for the creditors' meeting to be convened.
Orders
Orders of the court
Application allowed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.