Re Ozgrowth Ltd

Case [2022] WASC 107


JURISDICTION     :   SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

IN CHAMBERS

CITATION:   RE OZGROWTH LTD; EX PARTE OZGROWTH LTD [2022] WASC 107

CORAM:   HILL J

HEARD:   28 FEBRUARY 2022

DELIVERED          :   28 FEBRUARY 2022

PUBLISHED           :   30 MARCH 2022

FILE NO/S:   COR 26 of 2022

MATTER:   IN THE MATTER OF OZGROWTH LTD

EX PARTE

OZGROWTH LIMITED

Plaintiff

WAM CAPITAY LTD

Interested Party

FILE NO/S:   COR 27 of 2022

MATTER:   IN THE MATTER OF WESTOZ INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD

EX PARTE

WESTOZ INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD

Plaintiff

WAM CAPITAL LTD

Interested Party


Catchwords:

Corporations law - Scheme of arrangement - Application for orders convening scheme meeting under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Whether requirements to order scheme meeting are satisfied - Calculation of scheme consideration by reference to formula - Ratio of net tangible assets per share of target to one day volume weighted average price per share of acquirer - Orders made convening scheme meeting

Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001(Cth), s 411(1), s 412(1)(a), s 1319
Corporations Regulations 2001(Cth), sch 8
Supreme Court (Corporations) (WA) Rules 2004(WA), r 3.2

Result:

Orders made convening scheme meeting

Category:    B

Representation:

COR 26 of 2022

Counsel:

Plaintiff : A J Papamatheos & C E McKay
Interested Party : W C J Zappia

Solicitors:

Plaintiff : Steinepreis Paganin
Interested Party : Mills Oakley

COR 27 of 2022

Counsel:

Plaintiff : A J Papamatheos & C E McKay
Interested Party : W C J Zappia

Solicitors:

Plaintiff : Steinepreis Paganin
Interested Party : Mills Oakley

Case(s) referred to in decision(s):

Re Amcom Telecommunications Ltd [2015] FCA 341

Re APN News & Media Ltd [2007] FCA 770; (2007) 62 ACSR 400

Re Blackthorn Resources Ltd [2014] FCA 1115

Re CannPal [2021] WASC 37

Re CSR Ltd [2010] FCAFC 34; (2010) 183 FCR 358

Re David Jones Ltd [No 2] [2014] FCA 720; (2014) 101 ACSR 381

Re Doray Minerals Ltd [2019] WASC 57

Re DUET Management Company 1 Ltd [2013] NSWSC 817; (2013) 95 ACSR 34

Re Excelsior Gold Limited [2018] FCA 2064

Re Galaxy Resources Ltd [2021] WASC 277

Re Hills Motorway Ltd [2002] NSWSC 897; (2002) 43 ACSR 101

Re Investa Properties Ltd [2007] FCA 1104

Re Kangaroo Resources Ltd [2018] WASC 327

Re Macquarie Private Capital A Ltd [2008] NSWSC 323

Re Milton Corp Ltd [2021] FCA 992

Re NTM Gold Ltd; Ex parte NTM Gold Ltd [2021] WASC 22

Re Nzuri Copper Ltd [2019] WASC 189

Re Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd [2009] FCA 813; (2009) 179 FCR 20

Re Pacific Energy Ltd [2019] WASC 443

Re PM Capital Asian Opportunities Fund Ltd [2021] FCA 1380

Re Premium Investors Ltd [2012] FCA 1211

Re Scarborough Equities Ltd [2009] FCA 24

Re Scarborough Equities Ltd [No 2] [2009] FCA 484

Re SRG Ltd [2018] FCA 1092

Re Templeton Global Growth Fund Ltd [2021] NSWSC 1169

Re Wesfarmers Ltd [2018] WASC 308

Re Wesfarmers Ltd [No 2] [2018] WASC 357

HILL J:

Overview

  1. Each of Ozgrowth…

Continue reading Re Ozgrowth Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Ozgrowth Ltd [2022] WASC 107
Case
[2022] WASC 107
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This case involved two applications under s 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for leave to convene a meeting of shareholders of Ozgrowth Limited and Westoz Investment Company Limited. The applicants sought to convene the meetings to consider a proposed scheme of arrangement for the acquisition of all the issued shares of each company by WAM Capital Limited. Hill J considered whether the requirements to order a scheme meeting were satisfied and if the proposed scheme was fair and reasonable. Hill J found that all the requirements had been satisfied and that the proposed scheme was fair and reasonable and should be approved by the court. Hill J ordered that a meeting of the shareholders of Ozgrowth and Westoz be convened to consider and vote on the proposed scheme.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.