Re: Opposition by Brightflash USA LLC to registration of trade mark application 1885531 (9) - iWatchiT (Figurative) - in the name of China Trade Services Pty. Ltd
Case
•
[2020] ATMO 121
•14 July 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re: Opposition by Brightflash USA LLC to registration of trade mark application 1885531 (9) - iWatchiT (Figurative) - in the name of China Trade Services Pty. Ltd [2020] ATMO 121
[2020] ATMO 121
14 July 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an opposition by Brightflash USA LLC to the registration of the figurative trade mark "iWatchiT" (application no. 1885531) by China Trade Services Pty. Ltd. The opposition was brought before a delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks.
The primary legal issue before the delegate was whether the opponent had established its sole ground of opposition, which was based on section 44 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth). This section concerns the registration of trade marks that are identical or deceptively similar to earlier trade marks. The delegate was required to determine this issue based on the evidence filed by the parties and written submissions, applying the ordinary civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, with the relevant date for assessing rights being 9 November 2017.
The delegate found that the opponent had failed to discharge the onus of proof resting upon it to establish the ground of opposition under section 44. Consequently, the delegate decided that the trade mark application could proceed to registration. The delegate also awarded costs against the opponent in favour of the applicant.
The primary legal issue before the delegate was whether the opponent had established its sole ground of opposition, which was based on section 44 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth). This section concerns the registration of trade marks that are identical or deceptively similar to earlier trade marks. The delegate was required to determine this issue based on the evidence filed by the parties and written submissions, applying the ordinary civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, with the relevant date for assessing rights being 9 November 2017.
The delegate found that the opponent had failed to discharge the onus of proof resting upon it to establish the ground of opposition under section 44. Consequently, the delegate decided that the trade mark application could proceed to registration. The delegate also awarded costs against the opponent in favour of the applicant.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
16
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020