Re Oakleigh Acquisitions Pty Ltd (in Liq); Ex Parte Mark Anthony Conlan (As Liquidator of Oakleigh Acquisitions Pty Ltd) & Ors
Case
•
[2003] WASC 75
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Oakleigh Acquisitions Pty Ltd (in Liq); Ex Parte Mark Anthony Conlan (As Liquidator of Oakleigh Acquisitions Pty Ltd) & Ors [2003] WASC 75
[2003] WASC 75
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This case concerns a dispute over a sum of money held by Mark Anthony Conlan, acting as the liquidator of Oakleigh Acquisitions Pty Ltd and Rowena Nominees Pty Ltd. The money in question, $655,000, was paid by Hoylevans to Rowena Nominees Pty Ltd in settlement of a company charge. Sonya Gayle Kielman and Raymond Edward Kielman (HEK) claim that this money should be paid to them, as they are the beneficiaries of the company charge. The central legal issue was whether HEK was the beneficial owner of the money held by Conlan. The court found that HEK had a valid claim to the money based on the covenant in the company charge, which obligated Hoylevans to repay the amount to HEK under certain conditions. Conlan's concern that other investors might have a claim to the money was deemed unfounded, as there was no evidence that HEK or Hoylevans had knowledge of the breach of trust by Rowena Nominees Pty Ltd. The court concluded that HEK was indeed beneficially entitled to the money held by Conlan.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Contract Formation
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Interlocutory Orders
-
Trusts & Equity
-
Equitable Estoppel
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Conlan v Adams [2008] WASCA 61
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Conlan v Adams
[2008] WASCA 61
Oakleigh Acquisitions Pty Ltd (in Liq) v Johnstone-Hall
[2006] WASC 306
Re Rowena Nominees Pty Ltd; Ex parte Conlan
[2006] WASC 69
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
0
Martin v Taylor
[2000] FCA 1002
Martin v Taylor
[2000] FCA 1002
Re Conlan
[2001] WASC 230