Re Miller, D.E.E v Ex Parte Bondi Securities P/L

Case

[1993] FCA 387

23 Mar 1993

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTWIA )
GENERAL DIVISION )
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE
) NP 1603 of 1992
STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES )
RE:  DORIS EMILY ELIZABETH MILLER

Debtor

EX PARTE:  BOND1 SECURITIES PTY LIMITED

Creditor

CORAM: Burchett J.
PLACE: Sydney

DATE : 23 March 1993

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BURCHETT J.:

This matter is apparently ready to be dealt with as a bankruptcy petition in which no notice of objection has been filed. It has in fact been before the court since last October, the bankruptcy notice having been served pursuant to an order for substituted service some time before that, and the petition also served pursuant to an order for substituted service. The debtor has not filed any notice of objection, although apparently legally represented for some time, nor has any affidavit been filed in defence of the petition.

been the subject of dispute in the proceedings which led to accounting records, related to matters which appear to have
the Supreme Court judgment upon which the bankruptcy notice is founded, a judgment for a sum of the order of a quarter of a million dollars. The debtor does assert, and there is some evidence to support the proposition, that some transactions have taken place since that judgment, but there is nothing to demonstrate to me that there is anything suspicious about those transactions or any reason why an order for discovery should be made at a stage when there has not even been an issue raised by a notice of objection, nor has there been any demonstration of the supportability of any such issue by any affidavit. In fact, the transactions subsequent to the judgment are evidenced by correspondence emanating from the petitioning creditor's solicitors, who have stated with what appears to be frankness the position in that regard.
I am not satisfied that there is any ground on which an adjournment should be granted in this matter, and I am certainly not satisfied that there is any basis for making an order for discovery in this matter, in the circumstances.
Accordingly, the application for adjournment is rejected, and I refer the matter back to the registrar.

Nevertheless, and quite recently, the solicitor for the
debtor has sought discovery of detailed financial and

1: certify that this and the preceding page are a

true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of his

Honour M r Justice Burchett.

associate:  h&s(s-JL
Date: 10 June 1993 
Solicitor for the Debtor:  Mr M. English of
Messrs Verekers
Counsel for the Creditor:  M r S. Motbey with Mr
Young
Solicitors for the Creditor:  Messrs Lyons & Lyons
Date of hearing:  23 March 1993
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0