!
| RE: | LEISER | IVOR |
ORDER
r
| Judge makincr order: | Beaumont , J. |
| Date of order: | 2 0 September, 1983. |
I
| where made | : | Sydney . |
P
THE COURT ORDERS:
| 1. | I order | that | the | application | €or | dlschargc | be |
| refused. |
2. I make no order as to costs.
| IN THE FEDEML COURT O F AUSTRALIA | 1 |
| ) | |
| GENERAL DIVISION | ) |
| 1 |
| BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT | TEE STATE OF | ) 1 |
| NEW SOUTR WALES &VD | THE AUSTRALTAN | ) ) |
| TERRITORY | CAPITAL | 1 | No.VJ655 of 1981 |
| RE : | IVOR | LEISER |
| corn<: | Beaumont, J. |
| DATED : | 20 September, 1983. |
(ex tempore)
WASONS FOR JUDGMENT
| In this matter I have already lndicated | tinat I |
| propose to refuse the applicatlon. | I wlll now give reasons |
i i
| This is an appllcation for discharge from bankruptcy. | I |
| The facts are that the bankrupt | was made bankrupt | by a | i |
| j |
| sequestration order dated | 27 July, 1981. | No assets were |
l
| brought to the credlt of the estate and the bankrupt has | made |
1
| no contributions | on that account. | t |
| : | ||
| i | ||
| I |
| A number of creditors, | some external, | but in one case | l |
| i |
| the former wife | of the bankrupt, | have proved ln | estate. | the | In | t |
| i |
| round flgures the amounts of the | debts in which | proof has been | 1 I |
| : | |||
| Y | |||
| ! |
- 2 -
Y
c
| made exceed some | $65,000 of whlch some $16,000 conslsts of |
a debt owed to the former wife of the bankrupt pursuant to a deed of settlcment executed when their marrlage broke up.
| Orlglnally some $29,000 \cas owed by the bankrupt to | h l s wlfe |
| on that account, but various payments were made | In r ductlon |
| and the debc now stands | In the sum of approximately | $16,000 |
| whlch was the sublect | of a -judgment obtained in the | Dlstrlcc |
| Court . |
In paragraphs 8 and 9 of the report of the Official
Receiver dated 30 August, 1983 there 1s set out in a form
| whlch 1 would adopt for this purpose | mformation as to the |
bankrupt's present financial and personal positlon. There 1s
| also in that part of the report some expllcatlon | of the way in |
| which the bankrupt became financially embarrassed, | principally |
by reason of his actlvities as a dlrector and shareholder of a
private company, Rosewear Pty. Limited. I will not repeat
| that material here but would seek, | as it were, | to incorporate |
| it by reference. |
The bankrupt has sworn an affidavlt today which has
| been read in the appllcation | m whlch he indlcates his current |
| posltion. He says that he | 1s presefltly reslding wlth hls | wife, |
Ruth Leiser, but that he has suffered some health problems to
I I
| the extent that he is receiving medical treatment | for ulcers. | I |
| In paragraph 8 of that affldavit he says that, If he | 1 s now |
discharged, it is not hls intention to enter into any buslness
| on his own behalf, rather | It is more hls wlsh to continue as | ! |
- 3 -
| he 1s at present but without thc stlgma | of bankruptcy. He refers |
| to the clrcumstance that he has four chlldren aged | 23 years, |
| 25 years and twlns, | 28 years o€ age and some grandchlldren. |
| Reference was also made durlng the course | of the hearing to the |
circumstance that one of his chlldren is to be marrled shortly
| and the bankrupt wishes, perhaps understandably, in | hls later |
| years to | be free fron the stigma that | is attached through |
bankruptcy.
In my oplnion this appllcatlon is premature. There
are, in my view, no speclal circumstances whlch would suggest
| that the statutory period | of three years should not | run its |
full course in the present case.
| I may say that | If there had been no external creditors |
| or if soine assets had been brought | ln for the beneflt of |
| credltors or If some contrlbutlons had been | made, however modest, |
| my attltude may well have been dlfferent but | as matters stand |
there are no assets, there are no contrlbutlons, there are
| significant external credltors, and the application | is made |
| barely two years after the date | of the sequestration order. |
| In those circumstances I propose to refuse | th appllc- |
| ation and the orders | I make are as follows: |
| 1. | I refuse | the | applicatlon | for | discharge. |
| 2. | I make | no | order | as | to | costs. |
| 3 . | I | order that the exhibits may be handed out. |
I
| I certlfy that i-lmzsd | t h e | ?l preceding |
| pages are a true copy of | t h e reasons for |
judgment herein of The Honourable
| M r Justice Eeaumont. | S w y |
Associale
| Dated 17 | cf+m I5S3 |
f
- AGLC
- Re Leiser, Ivor [1983] FCA 288
- Case
- [1983] FCA 288
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to decide whether to grant the application for discharge from bankruptcy, considering the statutory period of three years from the sequestration order and the absence of any contributions or assets brought to the estate. The bankrupt's affidavit indicated that he wished to continue his current lifestyle without the stigma of bankruptcy, and he had no plans to engage in business activities. The court needed to assess whether the application was premature, given the circumstances of the case.
Justice Beaumont found the application to be premature. He noted that there were no special circumstances justifying an early discharge, as there were no assets or contributions, and there were significant external creditors. The application was made barely two years after the sequestration order. The court refused the application for discharge and made no order as to costs. Justice Beaumont ordered that the exhibits be handed out.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.