Re Leiser, Ivor
[1983] FCA 288
•20 Sep 1983
!
| RE: | LEISER | IVOR |
ORDER
r
| Judge makincr order: | Beaumont , J. |
| Date of order: | 2 0 September, 1983. |
I
| where made | : | Sydney . |
P
THE COURT ORDERS:
| 1. | I order | that | the | application | €or | dlschargc | be |
| refused. |
2. I make no order as to costs.
| IN THE FEDEML COURT O F AUSTRALIA | 1 |
| ) | |
| GENERAL DIVISION | ) |
| 1 |
| BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT | TEE STATE OF | ) 1 |
| NEW SOUTR WALES &VD | THE AUSTRALTAN | ) ) |
| TERRITORY | CAPITAL | 1 | No.VJ655 of 1981 |
| RE : | IVOR | LEISER |
| corn<: | Beaumont, J. |
| DATED : | 20 September, 1983. |
(ex tempore)
WASONS FOR JUDGMENT
| In this matter I have already lndicated | tinat I |
| propose to refuse the applicatlon. | I wlll now give reasons |
i i
| This is an appllcation for discharge from bankruptcy. | I |
| The facts are that the bankrupt | was made bankrupt | by a | i |
| j |
| sequestration order dated | 27 July, 1981. | No assets were |
l
| brought to the credlt of the estate and the bankrupt has | made |
1
| no contributions | on that account. | t |
| : | ||
| i | ||
| I |
| A number of creditors, | some external, | but in one case | l |
| i |
| the former wife | of the bankrupt, | have proved ln | estate. | the | In | t |
| i |
| round flgures the amounts of the | debts in which | proof has been | 1 I |
| : | |||
| Y | |||
| ! |
- 2 -
Y
c
| made exceed some | $65,000 of whlch some $16,000 conslsts of |
a debt owed to the former wife of the bankrupt pursuant to a deed of settlcment executed when their marrlage broke up.
| Orlglnally some $29,000 \cas owed by the bankrupt to | h l s wlfe |
| on that account, but various payments were made | In r ductlon |
| and the debc now stands | In the sum of approximately | $16,000 |
| whlch was the sublect | of a -judgment obtained in the | Dlstrlcc |
| Court . |
In paragraphs 8 and 9 of the report of the Official
Receiver dated 30 August, 1983 there 1s set out in a form
| whlch 1 would adopt for this purpose | mformation as to the |
bankrupt's present financial and personal positlon. There 1s
| also in that part of the report some expllcatlon | of the way in |
| which the bankrupt became financially embarrassed, | principally |
by reason of his actlvities as a dlrector and shareholder of a
private company, Rosewear Pty. Limited. I will not repeat
| that material here but would seek, | as it were, | to incorporate |
| it by reference. |
The bankrupt has sworn an affidavlt today which has
| been read in the appllcation | m whlch he indlcates his current |
| posltion. He says that he | 1s presefltly reslding wlth hls | wife, |
Ruth Leiser, but that he has suffered some health problems to
I I
| the extent that he is receiving medical treatment | for ulcers. | I |
| In paragraph 8 of that affldavit he says that, If he | 1 s now |
discharged, it is not hls intention to enter into any buslness
| on his own behalf, rather | It is more hls wlsh to continue as | ! |
- 3 -
| he 1s at present but without thc stlgma | of bankruptcy. He refers |
| to the clrcumstance that he has four chlldren aged | 23 years, |
| 25 years and twlns, | 28 years o€ age and some grandchlldren. |
| Reference was also made durlng the course | of the hearing to the |
circumstance that one of his chlldren is to be marrled shortly
| and the bankrupt wishes, perhaps understandably, in | hls later |
| years to | be free fron the stigma that | is attached through |
bankruptcy.
In my oplnion this appllcatlon is premature. There
are, in my view, no speclal circumstances whlch would suggest
| that the statutory period | of three years should not | run its |
full course in the present case.
| I may say that | If there had been no external creditors |
| or if soine assets had been brought | ln for the beneflt of |
| credltors or If some contrlbutlons had been | made, however modest, |
| my attltude may well have been dlfferent but | as matters stand |
there are no assets, there are no contrlbutlons, there are
| significant external credltors, and the application | is made |
| barely two years after the date | of the sequestration order. |
| In those circumstances I propose to refuse | th appllc- |
| ation and the orders | I make are as follows: |
| 1. | I refuse | the | applicatlon | for | discharge. |
| 2. | I make | no | order | as | to | costs. |
| 3 . | I | order that the exhibits may be handed out. |
I
| I certlfy that i-lmzsd | t h e | ?l preceding |
| pages are a true copy of | t h e reasons for |
judgment herein of The Honourable
| M r Justice Eeaumont. | S w y |
Associale
| Dated 17 | cf+m I5S3 |
f
0
0
0