Re Leiser, Ivor

Case

[1983] FCA 288

20 Sep 1983

No judgment structure available for this case.

!

RE:

LEISER

IVOR

ORDER

r

Judge makincr order:

Beaumont , J.

Date of order:

2 0 September, 1983.

I

where made

:

Sydney .

P

THE COURT ORDERS:

1.

I order

that

the

application

€or

dlschargc

be

refused.

2. I make no order as to costs.

IN THE FEDEML COURT O F AUSTRALIA

1

)

GENERAL DIVISION

)

1

BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT

TEE STATE OF

) 1

NEW SOUTR WALES &VD

THE AUSTRALTAN

) )

TERRITORY

CAPITAL

1

No.VJ655 of 1981

RE :

IVOR

LEISER

corn<:

Beaumont, J.

DATED :

20 September, 1983.

(ex tempore)

WASONS FOR JUDGMENT

In this matter I have already lndicated

tinat I

propose to refuse the applicatlon.

I wlll now give reasons

i i

This is an appllcation for discharge from bankruptcy.

I

The facts are that the bankrupt

was made bankrupt

by a

i

j

sequestration order dated

27 July, 1981.

No assets were

l

brought to the credlt of the estate and the bankrupt has

made

1

no contributions

on that account.

t

:

i

I

A number of creditors,

some external,

but in one case

l

i

the former wife

of the bankrupt,

have proved ln

estate.

the

In

t

i

round flgures the amounts of the

debts in which

proof has been

1 I

:

Y

!

- 2 -

Y

c

made exceed some

$65,000 of whlch some $16,000 conslsts of

a debt owed to the former wife of the bankrupt pursuant to a deed of settlcment executed when their marrlage broke up.

Orlglnally some $29,000 \cas owed by the bankrupt to

h l s wlfe

on that account, but various payments were made

In r ductlon

and the debc now stands

In the sum of approximately

$16,000

whlch was the sublect

of a -judgment obtained in the

Dlstrlcc

Court .

In paragraphs 8 and 9 of the report of the Official

Receiver dated 30 August, 1983 there 1s set out in a form

whlch 1 would adopt for this purpose

mformation as to the

bankrupt's present financial and personal positlon. There 1s

also in that part of the report some expllcatlon

of the way in

which the bankrupt became financially embarrassed,

principally

by reason of his actlvities as a dlrector and shareholder of a

private company, Rosewear Pty. Limited. I will not repeat

that material here but would seek,

as it were,

to incorporate

it by reference.

The bankrupt has sworn an affidavlt today which has

been read in the appllcation

m whlch he indlcates his current

posltion. He says that he

1s presefltly reslding wlth hls

wife,

Ruth Leiser, but that he has suffered some health problems to

I I

the extent that he is receiving medical treatment

for ulcers.

I

In paragraph 8 of that affldavit he says that, If he

1 s now

discharged, it is not hls intention to enter into any buslness

on his own behalf, rather

It is more hls wlsh to continue as

!

- 3 -

he 1s at present but without thc stlgma

of bankruptcy. He refers

to the clrcumstance that he has four chlldren aged

23 years,

25 years and twlns,

28 years o€ age and some grandchlldren.

Reference was also made durlng the course

of the hearing to the

circumstance that one of his chlldren is to be marrled shortly

and the bankrupt wishes, perhaps understandably, in

hls later

years to

be free fron the stigma that

is attached through

bankruptcy.

In my oplnion this appllcatlon is premature. There

are, in my view, no speclal circumstances whlch would suggest

that the statutory period

of three years should not

run its

full course in the present case.

I may say that

If there had been no external creditors

or if soine assets had been brought

ln for the beneflt of

credltors or If some contrlbutlons had been

made, however modest,

my attltude may well have been dlfferent but

as matters stand

there are no assets, there are no contrlbutlons, there are

significant external credltors, and the application

is made

barely two years after the date

of the sequestration order.

In those circumstances I propose to refuse

th appllc-

ation and the orders

I make are as follows:

1.

I refuse

the

applicatlon

for

discharge.

2.

I make

no

order

as

to

costs.

3 .

I

order that the exhibits may be handed out.

I

I certlfy that i-lmzsd

t h e

?l preceding

pages are a true copy of

t h e reasons for

judgment herein of The Honourable

M r Justice Eeaumont.

S w y

Associale

Dated 17

cf+m I5S3

f

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0