Re Kalache, L.G

Case [1988] FCA 793


d b

*

IN TEE J?EDERXL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

1 1

GENERAT. DIVISION
) NO. W551 Of 1988
1

BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT

IN TEE

1 1

STATE OF NEW SOUTB WALES AND TEE 1
1
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY 1
- Re : LESLIE GEORGE KALACBE

Bankrupt

CORAM: Einfeld J.

- DATE : 29 November 1988
PLACE: Sydney

EX-TEMPORE JDDGEIENT

This is an application for annulment under section 154(l)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 on the basis that the bankrupt has obtained a legal acquittance of the unsecured debts proved in the bankruptcy. The debts involved in this matter appear to be all debts to the State Bank of New South Wales, one in respect of a bankcard, one a Visa card and one a liability under guarantee. The total amount involved is just over $8300. None of these debts appear to have been proved in the bankruptcy

in the strict sense although there seems no doubt that they are the
debts and only debts of the bankrupt. I am therefore prepared to accept
these debts as being proved in the bankruptcy.

The next question is whether a legal aquittance has been obtained of

them as required by section 154(11 (b). The bankrupt has sworn in an

Is

  1. - 2 -

    1

    rough and ready way that seems to be largely correct. The liability under the guarantee has, I am informed, been written off by the State Bank, and in respect of the bankcard and Visa card debts, the bank appears to have accepted lesser sums in full and final settlement than the amounts acutally owing. I say "appears" to have done so because the

so-called acquittance document of the bank is neither dated nor sealed

despite the fact that on the face of it, the document is said to be both dated and sealed. The other problem is that there is no way of knowing

from the documentation before me as to whether the bankcard and Visa

card numbers which are set out on the acquittance are in fact the

respective cards involved in this matter.

Eowever, the matter has been investigated by the Official Trustee with
his usual care and I am prepared to accept in the circumstances of the

case that these formalities are merely puffs in the wind brought about, no doubt, by the enormous pressure on the State Bank of New South Wales these days in relation to the dating and sealing of documents. For all

those reasons I make an order under section 154(1) (b) annulling the

bankrupt c y .
Details
AGLC
Re Kalache, L.G [1988] FCA 793
Case
[1988] FCA 793
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Leslie George Kalache, a bankrupt, the Federal Court of Australia, General Division, was presented with an application for annulment of the bankrupt's discharge under section 154(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The basis for the application was that the bankrupt had purportedly obtained a legal acquittance of the unsecured debts that were proved in the bankruptcy. The debts in question were owed to the State Bank of New South Wales and included liabilities from a bankcard, a Visa card, and a guarantee. The total amount of the debts was approximately $8,300.

The court had to decide whether the debts had been legally acquitted as required by the Act. The bankrupt provided a rough declaration regarding the acquittance of the debts. It was informed that the State Bank had written off the guarantee liability. Furthermore, the bank had accepted lesser sums in full and final settlement for the bankcard and Visa card debts compared to the amounts actually owing. However, the acquittance document lacked the necessary date and seal, and there was no confirmation that the card numbers on the document matched those of the debts in question. Despite these issues, the Official Trustee had investigated the matter carefully, leading the court to accept that the bank's procedural shortcomings were due to the current pressure on the State Bank.

The court determined that the formal deficiencies in the acquittance documentation were inconsequential in the circumstances. The judge accepted the substance of the evidence presented, finding that the bankrupt had indeed obtained a legal acquittance of the debts. Consequently, the court annulled the bankrupt's discharge under section 154(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.