Re Jorgensen, Alan Bradley; Madgwicks v Jorgensen, Alan Bradley
[1998] FCA 678
•10 JUNE 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QX 154 of 1996
RE:
EX PARTE:
ALAN BRADLEY JORGENSEN
MADGWICKS
ApplicantAND:
ALAN BRADLEY JORGENSEN
RespondentJUDGE:
SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER:
10 JUNE 1998
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
There be no order as to costs against Custom Credit Corporation Ltd.
The applicant pay two-thirds of the costs of the respondent, including reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QX 154 of 1996
RE:
EX PARTE:
ALAN BRADLEY JORGENSEN
MADGWICKS
ApplicantAND:
ALAN BRADLEY JORGENSEN
Respondent
JUDGE:
SPENDER J
DATE:
10 JUNE 1998
PLACE:
BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 29 April 1998 I dismissed an application by Madgwicks and Custom Credit Corporation Ltd to have a composition set aside. Custom Credit Corporation Ltd was joined as a second applicant on the second day of the hearing in order to meet a challenge to the standing of Madgwicks as a creditor to bring the application. On 29 April, I indicated my provisional view that having regard to a number of matters, particularly the failure by Mr Jorgensen on the question of standing, I proposed to order Madgwicks pay half of Mr Jorgensen’s costs. I invited written submissions on the question of costs, which have been received.
I have had regard to those submissions. I do not accept that had Madgwicks been aware earlier of affidavit material from a number of creditors, they might not have persisted in their application.
The ordinary rule is that costs follow the event, although the court has a discretion to make an alternative order. I think that the question of the debtor/creditor relationship between the respondent and Madgwicks was a significant part of the application, and Mr Jorgensen’s failure in that regard ought to be recognised by making other than the ordinary order. On reflection, however, my initial view of a 50 percent reduction is too generous to the applicant Madgwicks. I make no order as to costs against Custom Credit, and order that Madgwicks pay two-thirds of the costs of the respondent, including reserved costs, those costs to be taxed if not agreed.
I certify that this and the preceding page are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Spender.
Associate:
Dated: 10 June 1998
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Gynther Solicitor for the Applicant: Madgwicks Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P P McQuade Solicitor for the Respondent: McHenry & Company Written submissions on costs By 13 May 1998 Date of Judgment on costs: 10 June 1998
0
0
0