Re: Estate of Anthony Philip Martin; Ex Parte: Grellman, Richard John (Trustee) v Martin

Case [1988] FCA 862


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )

)

GENERAL DIVISION 1
)
BANJSRmTCY DISTRICT IN THE ) No. W 1492 of 1988
1

STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND TEE

1 1

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY 1

Re :

- ESTATE OF ANTEONY PEILIP MARTIN
Bankrupt
Ex Parte:  RICHARD JOEN GRELLMAN
Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate

Applicant

- And : ANTHONY PHILIP MARTIN and
CAROL-ANNE MARTIN

Respondent

CORAM: Einfeld J.

- DATE: 10 June 1988
PLACE: Sydney

EX-TEMPORE JUDGMENT

This is an application by the trustee of the bankrupt estate of Anthony

an opportunity to the proposed respondents to the injunction to be
Philip Martin, who, in today's ex parte hearing, seeks injunctive relief

against the bankrupt and his wife (the respondents) to prevent the

registration of a deed between the respondents dated 10 October 1986 in
the Family Court of Australia, pursuant to the provisions of section 86
of the Family Law Act 1975.
It is unusual to grant ex parte injunctions in this Court without giving

heard, but the evidence before me indicates that if registration is

effected, albeit now one year and eight months after the deed has been

executed, there may result an irremediable transfer of the property of

the bankrupt out of the reach of the trustee.

I make no judgment at this time on whether the law has that effect. It
certainly would be extraordinary if the mere registration of a deed in

the Family Court would have the effect of placing relevant property out

of the reach of the trustee, whereas if the same transfer had been

effected by the ordinary method through the Registrar General's office,

relief would be able to to be obtained. However, I am prepared to
assume for present purposes that registration in the Family Court might
have that result.

In view of the long delay since the execution of the deed, and because

even now, after so long, registration has not been effected, it seems to
me that no hardship or prejudice will be caused to the respondents if I
formally order the non-registration of the document for a few days to
enable the respondents to be heard.
For those reasons, I order until further order that the respondents and

their respective solicitors, their servants and agents, be restrained

from registering or taking any steps to register the deed in the Family
Court of Australia, or to otherwise register any transfer or assignment

of the interest of the bankrupt in the land described in Certificate of Title Volume 14079 Folio 167, at present registered in the name of the bankrupt.

I pronounce those injunctions having received from counsel for the

trustee, said to be on the express instructions of the trustee, the

usual undertaking as to damages upon the grant of injunctive relief.
Costs in the matter will be reserved. The application is returnable
before me at 9.30 on Thursday 16 June.
I direct that service of the application, the affidavits and the
appropriate exhibits be effected upon the respondents by not later than
5 pm on Monday 13 June.

./

I certify that this and the i “0

preceding p e p s are a true copy of thn
Reasons for Judgment herein of his Honour

Mr. Justice Etnfeld

Details
AGLC
Re: Estate of Anthony Philip Martin; Ex Parte: Grellman, Richard John (Trustee) v Martin [1988] FCA 862
Case
[1988] FCA 862
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the case of Re: Estate of Anthony Philip Martin; Ex Parte: Grellman, Richard John (Trustee) v Martin was heard. The case involved an application by Richard John Grellman, the trustee of the bankrupt estate of Anthony Philip Martin, seeking injunctive relief to prevent the registration of a deed between the bankrupt and his wife, Carol-Anne Martin, in the Family Court of Australia. The application was made ex parte, without notice to the respondents, due to the potential for an irremediable transfer of the bankrupt's property out of the reach of the trustee if the deed were to be registered. The legal issue before the court was whether an ex parte injunction could be granted without notice to the respondents, and if so, under what circumstances. The court also needed to consider whether the mere registration of the deed in the Family Court could result in an irremediable transfer of property, and whether there would be any prejudice to the respondents if the injunction were granted.

Justice Einfeld determined that while it is unusual to grant ex parte injunctions without notice, the circumstances of this case warranted such an approach. The delay in registering the deed, which had been executed over a year and eight months prior, and the lack of any action to register it despite the delay, suggested that the respondents would not be prejudiced by the injunction. Justice Einfeld was prepared to assume, for the purpose of the injunction, that the registration of the deed in the Family Court could indeed result in an irremediable transfer of property. Consequently, the court granted the injunction until further order, restraining the respondents and their solicitors, servants, and agents from registering or taking any steps to register the deed in the Family Court, or otherwise registering any transfer or assignment of the bankrupt's interest in the specified land. The injunction was granted with an undertaking as to damages upon the grant of injunctive relief, and costs in the matter were reserved.

In summary, the court found that the circumstances justified the grant of an ex parte injunction to prevent the potential irremediable transfer of property out of the reach of the trustee. The injunction was issued pending further hearing, allowing the respondents an opportunity to be heard. The court reserved costs and directed that service of the application, affidavits, and exhibits be made to the respondents by a specified date.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.