IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
)
GENERAL DIVISION 1 )
BANJSRmTCY DISTRICT IN THE ) No. W 1492 of 1988 1
STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND TEE
1 1
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY 1
Re :
- ESTATE OF ANTEONY PEILIP MARTIN
Bankrupt
Ex Parte: RICHARD JOEN GRELLMAN
Trustee of the Bankrupt Estate
Applicant
- And : ANTHONY PHILIP MARTIN and CAROL-ANNE MARTIN
Respondent
CORAM: Einfeld J.
- DATE: 10 June 1988 PLACE: Sydney
EX-TEMPORE JUDGMENT
This is an application by the trustee of the bankrupt estate of Anthony
an opportunity to the proposed respondents to the injunction to be
Philip Martin, who, in today's ex parte hearing, seeks injunctive relief
against the bankrupt and his wife (the respondents) to prevent the
registration of a deed between the respondents dated 10 October 1986 in
the Family Court of Australia, pursuant to the provisions of section 86
of the Family Law Act 1975.
It is unusual to grant ex parte injunctions in this Court without giving
heard, but the evidence before me indicates that if registration is
effected, albeit now one year and eight months after the deed has been
executed, there may result an irremediable transfer of the property of
the bankrupt out of the reach of the trustee.
I make no judgment at this time on whether the law has that effect. It certainly would be extraordinary if the mere registration of a deed in
the Family Court would have the effect of placing relevant property out
of the reach of the trustee, whereas if the same transfer had been
effected by the ordinary method through the Registrar General's office,
relief would be able to to be obtained. However, I am prepared to assume for present purposes that registration in the Family Court might have that result.
In view of the long delay since the execution of the deed, and because
even now, after so long, registration has not been effected, it seems to
me that no hardship or prejudice will be caused to the respondents if I formally order the non-registration of the document for a few days to enable the respondents to be heard.
For those reasons, I order until further order that the respondents and
their respective solicitors, their servants and agents, be restrained
from registering or taking any steps to register the deed in the Family Court of Australia, or to otherwise register any transfer or assignment
of the interest of the bankrupt in the land described in Certificate of Title Volume 14079 Folio 167, at present registered in the name of the bankrupt.
I pronounce those injunctions having received from counsel for the
trustee, said to be on the express instructions of the trustee, the
usual undertaking as to damages upon the grant of injunctive relief. Costs in the matter will be reserved. The application is returnable before me at 9.30 on Thursday 16 June.
I direct that service of the application, the affidavits and the appropriate exhibits be effected upon the respondents by not later than 5 pm on Monday 13 June.
./
I certify that this and the i “0 preceding p e p s are a true copy of thn
Reasons for Judgment herein of his HonourMr. Justice Etnfeld
- AGLC
- Re: Estate of Anthony Philip Martin; Ex Parte: Grellman, Richard John (Trustee) v Martin [1988] FCA 862
- Case
- [1988] FCA 862
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Justice Einfeld determined that while it is unusual to grant ex parte injunctions without notice, the circumstances of this case warranted such an approach. The delay in registering the deed, which had been executed over a year and eight months prior, and the lack of any action to register it despite the delay, suggested that the respondents would not be prejudiced by the injunction. Justice Einfeld was prepared to assume, for the purpose of the injunction, that the registration of the deed in the Family Court could indeed result in an irremediable transfer of property. Consequently, the court granted the injunction until further order, restraining the respondents and their solicitors, servants, and agents from registering or taking any steps to register the deed in the Family Court, or otherwise registering any transfer or assignment of the bankrupt's interest in the specified land. The injunction was granted with an undertaking as to damages upon the grant of injunctive relief, and costs in the matter were reserved.
In summary, the court found that the circumstances justified the grant of an ex parte injunction to prevent the potential irremediable transfer of property out of the reach of the trustee. The injunction was issued pending further hearing, allowing the respondents an opportunity to be heard. The court reserved costs and directed that service of the application, affidavits, and exhibits be made to the respondents by a specified date.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.