Re Equinox Resources Ltd

Case [2004] WASC 143


RE EQUINOX RESOURCES LTD [2004] WASC 143



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2004] WASC 143
Case No:COR:108/200417 JUNE 2004
Coram:EM HEENAN J17/06/04
8Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Scheme approved
B
PDF Version
Parties:EQUINOX RESOURCES LTD (ACN 060 581 777)

Catchwords:

Corporations
Scheme of Arrangement
Exchange of shares for shares to be issued in Canadian incorporated company
Corporations Act, s 411
Notice to Foreign Investments Review Board and Department of Treasury

Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Case References:

ACM Gold Ltd v Mt Leyshon Gold Mines Ltd (1992) 7 ACSR 231
Re Arnotts Ltd (1998) 16 ACLC 423
Re Stockbridge Ltd (1993) 9 ACSR 637

Re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas and Pacific Junction Railway Company [1891] 1 Ch 213
Re Chevron (Sydney) Ltd [1963] VR 249
Re Amcor Ltd (2000) 34 ACSR 199; [2000] VSC 157
Re Challenge Bank Ltd (1995) 19 ACSR 421
Re Dorman, Long & Company Ltd [1934] 1 Ch 635
Re Foundation Healthcare Ltd (No 2) [2002] 43 ACSR 680
Re Hudson Conway Ltd (2000) 33 ACSR 657
Re Landmark Corporation Limited [1968] 1 NSWR 759
Re NRMA Insurance Ltd (No 1) (2000) 156 FLR 349; (2000) 33 ACSR 595
Re NRMA Insurance Ltd (No 2) (2000) 34 ACSR 261
Re Pheon Pty Ltd (1986) 47 SASR 427; (1986) 11 ACLR 142
Re Sonodyne International Ltd (1994) 15 ACSR 494

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    IN CHAMBERS
CITATION : RE EQUINOX RESOURCES LTD [2004] WASC 143 CORAM : EM HEENAN J HEARD : 17 JUNE 2004 DELIVERED : 17 JUNE 2004 FILE NO/S : COR 108 of 2004 MATTER : Section 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Clth) and EQUINOX RESOURCES LTD EX PARTE

    EQUINOX RESOURCES LTD (ACN 060 581 777)
    Plaintiff



Catchwords:

Corporations - Scheme of Arrangement - Exchange of shares for shares to be issued in Canadian incorporated company - Corporations Act, s 411 - Notice to Foreign Investments Review Board and Department of Treasury




Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)




Result:

Scheme approved



(Page 2)

Category: B

Representation:


Counsel:


    Plaintiff : Mr C D Belyea & Ms M N Campion


Solicitors:

    Plaintiff : Clayton Utz



Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

ACM Gold Ltd v Mt Leyshon Gold Mines Ltd (1992) 7 ACSR 231
Re Arnotts Ltd (1998) 16 ACLC 423
Re Stockbridge Ltd (1993) 9 ACSR 637

Case(s) also cited:



Re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas and Pacific Junction Railway Company [1891] 1 Ch 213
Re Chevron (Sydney) Ltd [1963] VR 249
Re Amcor Ltd (2000) 34 ACSR 199; [2000] VSC 157
Re Challenge Bank Ltd (1995) 19 ACSR 421
Re Dorman, Long & Company Ltd [1934] 1 Ch 635
Re Foundation Healthcare Ltd (No 2) [2002] 43 ACSR 680
Re Hudson Conway Ltd (2000) 33 ACSR 657
Re Landmark Corporation Limited [1968] 1 NSWR 759
Re NRMA Insurance Ltd (No 1) (2000) 156 FLR 349; (2000) 33 ACSR 595
Re NRMA…

Continue reading Re Equinox Resources Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Equinox Resources Ltd [2004] WASC 143
Case
[2004] WASC 143
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Equinox Resources Ltd, an Australian corporation, applied to the Supreme Court of Western Australia for approval of a scheme of arrangement under Section 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that would see all its issued shares exchanged for shares in a Canadian incorporated company. The court needed to decide whether the scheme was fair and equitable to all shareholders, if proper procedures were followed, and if any statutory requirements had been complied with. The court found that the scheme had been properly presented to the shareholders, who had overwhelmingly approved it, and that there was no modification to the rights of shareholders or creditors. The court also found that the scheme did not require the approval of the Foreign Investments Review Board, as it was outside the scope of the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission also had no objection to the scheme. Therefore, the court approved the scheme of arrangement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.