Re Edelsten, G.W.

Case [1988] FCA 89


NOT SUITABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION

I N THE FEDERAL COURT O F AUSTRALIA )
GENERAL DIVISION )
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE STATE ) N O . P .1551 of 1 9 8 7
OF NEW SOUTH WALES AND THE 1
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY 1
- R E :

GEOFFREY WALTER EDELSTEK

D e b t o r

EX PARTE:

FULL POINT PTY L I M I T E D

C r e d i t o r

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BURCHETT J .

T h i s mat te r was h e a r d a t t h e same time a s t h e
a p p l l c a t l o n b y t h e D e p u t y C o m m l s s l o n e r of T a x a t l o n t o a n n u l t h e
b a n k r u p t c y of G e o f f r e y Walter E d e l s t e n i n r e s p e c t of w h l c h I h a v e
j u s t d e l l v e r e d j u d g m e n t .
T h e p e t i t i o n of F u l l . P o i n t P t y . L l m l t e d was n o t d l s p u t e d
b y e v l d e n c e o r a r g u m e n t a n d was s u p p o r t e d b y e v i d e n c e ~n t h e
u s u a l f o r m . 1 am s a t i s f i e d t h a t t h e d e b t o r , G e o f f r e y W a l t e r
C d e l s t e n , c o m m i t t e d t h e a c t b a n k r u p t c y o f a l l e g e d 1 n t h e
p e t i t i o n . I am s a t i s f l e d o f p r o o f o f t h e o t h e r m a t t e r s of w h l c h
s . 5 2 ( 1 ) o f t h e B a n k r u p t c y A c t 1 9 6 6 r e q u l r e s p r o o f . I no te t h a t
May C h r i s t o p h e r D o n n e l l - y , a registered trusLee, h a s c o n s e q t c d I-o
a c t a s t rus tee of t h e e s t a t e of t h e d e b t o r . I make il
s e q u e s t r a t l o n o r d e r a g a l n s t h e e s t a t e o f t h e d e b t o r a n d o t - \ - l ~ ~ -
t h a t cos t s ( I n c l u d i n a r e s e r v e d c o s t s ) b e t a x e d a n d p a i d a c c o r t d ~ n ( A
t o t h e A c t . I d i r e c t t h a t a d r a f t of t h e s e o r d e r s b e d e l i v e r e d
t o t h e Reg i s t r a r w i t h i n s e v e n d a y s I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h r . 1 2 4 ( 2 ) .
I c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s a n d t h e
p r e c e d i n g one (1 ) p a g e a r e a
k r u e c o p y o f t h e Reasons f o r
J u d g m e n t h e r e i n of h i s H o n o u r
Mr. B u r c h e t t . J u s t i c e .
Date;:  1 0 M a r c h 1 9 8 8 .
C o u n s e l f o r t h e D e b t o r : Mr C. C u r t i s
S o l i c i t o r s f o r t h e D e b t o r : S h e n k e r & A s s o c i a t e s
C o u n s e l f o r t h e C r e d i t o r : G . W a t s o n , J . F e r n o n
So l i c l to r s f o r t h e C r e d i t o r : J s e n b e r g , S p e d d i n g &
P l a y e r
Dates o f h e a r i n g : 9 , 16 O c t o b e r 1 9 8 7
1 3 November 1987
Details
AGLC
Re Edelsten, G.W. [1988] FCA 89
Case
[1988] FCA 89
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Re Edelsten, G.W. involved the petition for bankruptcy filed by Full Point Pty Limited against Geoffrey Walter Edelsten. The dispute was heard in the Federal Court of Australia, specifically in the General Division, within the Bankruptcy District of the State of New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. The nature of the case was an application for a sequestration order against the debtor, Geoffrey Walter Edelsten, based on the creditor's allegation that the debtor had committed an act of bankruptcy.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the debtor, Geoffrey Walter Edelsten, had indeed committed an act of bankruptcy, as alleged by the creditor, Full Point Pty Limited. Additionally, the court needed to determine if the evidence provided was sufficient to meet the requirements of section 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The court also had to address the appointment of a trustee to manage the debtor's estate and consider the costs associated with the application.

Justice Burchett, who presided over the case, found that the debtor had committed the alleged act of bankruptcy. The court was satisfied with the evidence provided and deemed it sufficient to meet the requirements under section 52(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. Consequently, Justice Burchett made a sequestration order against the debtor's estate and appointed May Christopher Donnelly, a registered trustee, to act as the trustee of the debtor's estate. The court also directed that costs be taxed and paid according to the Act. These orders were to be drafted and delivered to the Registrar within seven days as per rule 124(2).

The final orders of the court included the sequestration order against the debtor's estate, the appointment of May Christopher Donnelly as the trustee of the debtor's estate, and the direction for the taxation and payment of costs in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.