Re Davison, Cheryl Patricia Ex Parte Davison, Cheryl Patricia

Case [1996] FCA 948


NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA     )
GENERAL DIVISION  )
   No. QB 2453 of 1996
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE             )
STATE OF QUEENSLAND  )

RE:CHERYL PATRICIA DAVISON

EX PARTE:CHERYL PATRICIA DAVISON

MINUTES OF ORDER

JUDGE MAKING ORDER:     Spender J

DATE OF ORDER:          14 October 1996

WHERE MADE:              Brisbane

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The bankruptcy of Cheryl Patricia Davison is annulled.

NOTE:     Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 124 of the Bankruptcy Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA     )
GENERAL DIVISION  )
   No. QB 2453 of 1996
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF THE             )
STATE OF QUEENSLAND  )

RE:CHERYL PATRICIA DAVISON

EX PARTE:CHERYL PATRICIA DAVISON

CORAM:    Spender J
DATE:     14 October 1996
PLACE:    Brisbane

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

This application raises circumstances which are not common, but which are understandable.  Mrs Cheryl Patricia Davison presented her own petition on 24 July 1996.  The statement of affairs which accompanied that petition showed that she had cash of $127.00 and an expected tax refund of $391.00, making her total assets $518.00.  It appears the only creditor of any kind, apart from her mother, is the Department of Social Security ("the Department") to whom she owes $5,789.58.  This amount is owed in relation to the overpayment of benefits.

It is apparent from those short facts that the basis of the presentation of the debtor's petition was a belief by Mrs Davison that her bankruptcy would ameliorate her position in relation to the Department.  She is employed as an assistant nurse at a nursing home with a gross income of $882.94 a fortnight.  She is not liable to contribute to her estate according to the report by Charles Andrew Smith, the
Acting Senior Assistant Official Receiver who prepared a report dated 3 October 1996 concerning Mrs Davison's bankruptcy.

There is one feature which is of some concern. Mrs Davison presented her own petition on 15 February 1993 jointly with her husband from whom she is now separated. The bankruptcy number of that bankruptcy is QB 301 of 1993, and the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy is the trustee of her estate. Pursuant to s 149ZF of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 ("the Act"), Mrs Davison was granted an early discharge from the earlier bankruptcy on 15 March 1995. The fact that she has received an early discharge has a significance in relation to her prospects of discharge from the present bankruptcy if that bankruptcy is not annulled.

The fact of her being bankrupt previously in ten years means that she is not eligible for early discharge. Notwithstanding what seems to be an omission contrary to the provisions of s 267(1)(b) of the Act in failing to disclose the fact of her previous bankruptcy in her statement of affairs, it seems to me that this was the result of inadvertence and more because of a misunderstanding of her legal obligations, and was not done in any way to mislead or deceive anybody.

I think that petition was presented by Mrs Davison on a fundamental misunderstanding of its function and
consequences, and that on a proper appreciation of the consequences for her of the presentation of the petition and on receiving proper advice, she would not have presented that petition.

In that sense it seems to me that the petition ought not to have been presented.  It serves no useful function either from the point of view of Mrs Davison or from the point of her creditor, the Department.  That Department has open to it means of recovery despite her bankruptcy, and, as I understand the matter, there is an agreement in place between Mrs Davison and the Department concerning not only the paying of some sums towards her debt but as to the quantum of that debt as well.

No prejudice to any person would flow from my annulling the bankruptcy. It seems to me in the rather sad circumstances of this case, I ought to make an order annulling her bankruptcy pursuant to the powers conferred on the court by s 153B of the Act.

The order of the court is the bankruptcy of Cheryl Patricia Davison is annulled.

I certify that this and the  preceding two (2) pages are a true copy of the reasons for judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Spender.

Associate
  Date: 14 October 1996

The debtor appeared in person.

Mr C Smith of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy appeared for the trustee.

Date of Hearing                :         14 October 1996

Details
AGLC
Re Davison, Cheryl Patricia Ex Parte Davison, Cheryl Patricia [1996] FCA 948
Case
[1996] FCA 948
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Cheryl Patricia Davison applied to the Federal Court of Australia to have her bankruptcy annulled. The petitioner believed that her bankruptcy would improve her financial situation, particularly in relation to the Department of Social Security, which she owed money to for overpaid benefits. The petitioner had presented her own petition on 24 July 1996, despite having previously been discharged from bankruptcy on 15 March 1995, a fact she failed to disclose in her statement of affairs. The petitioner's assets totalled $518, and she was not liable to contribute to her estate. The petitioner's gross income was $882.94 per fortnight as an assistant nurse. The court had to decide whether to annul the petitioner's bankruptcy.

The court considered the petitioner's misunderstanding of the function and consequences of presenting the bankruptcy petition. The petitioner's previous bankruptcy within ten years made her ineligible for early discharge, and the court believed that if the petitioner had received proper advice, she would not have presented the petition. The court also considered that the petitioner's bankruptcy did not serve any useful function for either the petitioner or her creditor, the Department of Social Security. The court concluded that annulling the bankruptcy would not cause any prejudice to any person.

The court annulled the petitioner's bankruptcy pursuant to the powers conferred on the court by section 153B of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The court certified that the reasons for judgment were a true copy of the Honourable Justice Spender. The debtor appeared in person, and Mr. C. Smith of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy appeared for the trustee. The date of the hearing was 14 October 1996.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.