Re Cyril Glen Wehr

Case [1982] FCA 323


JUDGMENT

LOCKHART J Case N o 125 of 1980

CYRIL GLEN WEAR

HIS HONOUR:  Thls 1 s an app l l ca t ion fo r d l scha rge f rom
bankruptcy by Cyrll Glen Wehr, who was made
bankrupt on 15 February 1980. I need not re la te
a l l t h e facts r e l e v a n t t o t h e a p p l l c a t l o n f o r
dlscharge; they have been set o u t f u l l y I n t h e
Off lc la l R e c e l v e r ‘ s r e p o r t o n t h l s a p p l l c a t l o n

and In the ev ldence g lven today by the bankrupt

and h is daughter , Mrs DeWlt.
P la ln ly , t he bankrup tcy was brought about
pr lmarl ly because, soon after a most unfortunate
event occurred In August 1978 when the son-ln-law
of the bankrupt was k l l l e d as a r e s u l t of an
accldent , and hls daughter was s e r l o u s l y l n j u r e d
f o r a s u b s t a n t i a l time, h e l e n t h l s name t o
commerclal documents, lncludlng leases, guarantees
and forms of a p p l i c a t i o n f o r r e g l s t r a t i o n of bus lness
names I n respect of bus inesses p rev ious ly ca r r i ed
on by h l s son-In-law and daughter. Thls he d l d f o r
t h e p u r p o s e r e a l l y of h e l p m g h l s d a u g h t e r I n t h e
d l f f l c u l t s l t u a t l o n c r e a t e d b y h e r l n d l s p o s l t l o n ,
b u t a s a temporary measure unt l l she should be able
t o h a n d l e h e r own b u s l n e s s a f f a l r s a g a l n .
I n t h e r e s u l t , t h e p e o p l e who a c t u a l l y r a n t h e
bus lness , no t be lng the bankrupt h lmsel f who appears
t he bus iness , g ros s ly mismanaged t h e b u s i n e s s a f f a i r s a n d
incur red subs tan t ia l debts . Thus , the bankrupt has
s u b s t a n t i a l l i a b i l i t i e s and v i r t u a l l y no assets.
There has been some d iscuss ion today as t o whether
t h e b a n k r u p t ' s i n t e r e s t i n a house a t Felixstow, which i s
r e g i s t e r e d i n t h e j o i n t names of himself and his wife , could
b e a v a i l a b l e t o c r e d i t o r s o f t h e estate, notwi ths tanding the
p rov i s ions of s e c t i o n 63 of the Defence Services Homes : A c t 1918.
I s h a l l s a y n o t h i n g a b o u t t h a t as it is p l a i n l y a matter t o be
d e t e r m i n e d , i f e v e r , i n a n o t h e r case when t h e r e h a s b e e n f u l l
argument upon it. I d o n o t t h i n k t h a t , i n t h e end, anything
t u r n s on t h a t p r o v i s i o n f o r t h e p u r p o s e s of t h i s a p p l i c a t i o n ,
e x c e p t t o s a y t h a t :  I understand it may have been the view
i n p r a c t i c e t h a t a bankrupt within the meaning of t h a t A c t
who becomes bankrupt , bu t before he i s discharged from
bankruptcy pays out a l l that remains under his loan from the
Defence Services H o m e s Corporat ion, does not necessar i ly have
t o b r i n g i n t o t h e estate of h i s b a n k r u p t c y h i s i n t e r e s t i n t h e
home. In o ther words , it may b e t h a t t h e e f f e c t of S. 33

-

upon i ts strict c o n s t r u c t i o n is t o p r o t e c t t h e b a n k r u p t ' s
i n t e r e s t i n h i s home, n o t o n l y h i s i n t e r e s t a t t h e d a t e of
t h e commencement of h i s bankruptcy but whatever in te res t or
i n t e r e s t s h e may t h e r e a f t e r a c q u i r e i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e home
whils t he remains an undischarged bankrupt . I express no
further view upon it, e x c e p t t o s a y t h a t t h e q u e s t i o n i s p l a i n l y
an open one.
The bankrupt is 65 yea r s of age, he i s married and i s i n
employment. Nothing unfavourable i s repor t ed by. t h e O f f i c i a l
Receiver and no relevant offences have been commit ted by t h e
bankrupt. N o matters are reported under sub-s. of S . 150.
It i s t r u e t h a t , as no object ion has been lodge1 d , the bankrupt
w i l l , in the ord inary course , be d ischarged f rom his bankruptcy
in Februa ry 1983, bu t I t h i n k i n a l l the c i rcumstances it 1s
r ight that he be discharged today from bankruptcy. Accordingly,
I make an order of d ischarge .

l

Details
AGLC
Re Cyril Glen Wehr [1982] FCA 323
Case
[1982] FCA 323
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Re Cyril Glen Wehr, the applicant sought a discharge from bankruptcy. The application was brought before Lockhart J. The primary issue before the court was whether the applicant, who had become bankrupt due to the mismanagement of businesses by his son-in-law and daughter, should be granted a discharge from bankruptcy. The court considered the applicant's intention to use his name on commercial documents as a temporary measure to assist his daughter in a difficult situation, and the resulting substantial debts incurred by the businesses.

The court also briefly discussed the potential availability of the applicant's interest in a house at Felixstow to the creditors, but decided that the matter was not determinable in this case. Lockhart J noted that the applicant, who was 65 years old, married, and employed, had no reported unfavorable matters or relevant offences. As no objections were lodged, the applicant would ordinarily be discharged from bankruptcy in February 1983. However, the court found that, in all the circumstances, it was appropriate to discharge the applicant from bankruptcy immediately.

Lockhart J made an order for the discharge of the applicant from bankruptcy.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.