| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted |
AT MELBOURNE
COMMON LAW DIVISION
TRUSTS, EQUITY AND PROBATE LIST
S ECI 2019 03554
| RICHARD ANTHONY CONNOCK (in his capacity as executor of the estate of Dr Richard Hugh Shephard Connock) | Plaintiff |
| v | |
| BARBARA FAYE CONNOCK | Defendant |
---
JUDGE: | Moore J |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne |
DATES OF HEARING: | 14 – 16, 21 June 2022; 6 – 7, 9 September 2022 |
DATE OF JUDGMENT: | 24 July 2023 |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | Re Connock (No 3) |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2023] VSC 420 |
---
WILLS AND ESTATES – Proprietary estoppel – Estoppel by encouragement – Where plaintiff alleges deceased and defendant shared mutual expectation regarding disposition of assets upon their passing – Held no such expectation continued to exist between the parties – Proceeding dismissed – Flocas v Carlson [2015] VSC 221.
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Plaintiff | Mr C Gunson SC with Mr L Hogan | John Keating & Associates |
| For the Defendant | Mr M Tehan | Hall & Wilcox |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1
The Asset Expectation................................................................................................................. 3
Issues for determination............................................................................................................. 5
Dr Richard Connock.................................................................................................................... 6
Witnesses....................................................................................................................................... 9
Basil Ristevski.............................................................................................................................. 10
Principal findings of fact.......................................................................................................... 12
The 2006 wills.............................................................................................................................. 12
2008 - 2011.................................................................................................................................... 13
2012 wills...................................................................................................................................... 14
Dr Connock......................................................................................................................... 14
Mrs Connock...................................................................................................................... 16
2012 Binding Death Benefit Nomination................................................................................. 17
2014 wills...................................................................................................................................... 17
Dr Connock......................................................................................................................... 17
Mrs Connock...................................................................................................................... 20
The Buckland conversation – January 2015............................................................................ 21
Death benefit nomination – July 2015...................................................................................... 27
Dr Connock’s death.................................................................................................................... 28
The December 2017 note............................................................................................................ 28
Preparation and execution of a new will for Mrs Connock: December 2017 – January 2018 31
Probate.......................................................................................................................................... 36
Mrs Connock’s April 2018 will.................................................................................................. 36
Mrs Connock’s 2019 will............................................................................................................ 36
Question 1: Was there, as a matter of fact, an Asset Expectation as alleged by Mr Connock?.................................................................................................................................................. 36
Mr Connock’s submissions........................................................................................................ 37
Consideration.............................................................................................................................. 43
Disposition.................................................................................................................................. 59
HIS HONOUR:
Introduction
Dr Richard Hugh Shephard Connock and Faye Connock married on 17 August 2002 when they were respectively 71 and 65 years of age. For each it was their third marriage. Although they met many years earlier in about 1960, their romantic relationship commenced in about 2000.
When they married, Dr Connock had three adult children from his first marriage of 31 years: Richard Anthony Connock (who I will refer to as Mr Connock), Patricia Connock and Linda Sutton (collectively, ‘the Connock children’). Faye Connock, who I will refer to as Mrs Connock, had five children from her first marriage.[1]
[1]Mary-Anne Gurr, Belinda Gurr, Susan Sweeting, Michael Gurr (who died in 2017) and Christopher Gurr.
Dr Connock had accumulated substantial assets before his marriage to Mrs Connock. He was the sole registered proprietor of a property in Edgerton Street, Hawthorn (the Hawthorn property), the sole registered proprietor of a property in Napier Street, South Melbourne (the South Melbourne property) and the sole member of the Shephard Superannuation Fund (the superannuation fund) which he established in about 1995. He also had various bank and investment accounts. Comparatively, Mrs Connock had accumulated only…
Continue reading Re Connock (No 3)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re Connock (No 3) [2023] VSC 420
- Case
- [2023] VSC 420
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court had to address was whether a mutual expectation existed between the deceased and the plaintiff about the disposition of the deceased's assets. The court examined the evidence to ascertain whether there was an understanding that the plaintiff would receive certain assets upon the deceased's death. It also needed to consider whether the defendant had encouraged the plaintiff to act in reliance on this expectation. The court had to apply established legal principles to determine if the plaintiff's claim was substantiated.
The court found that there was no mutual expectation between the deceased and the plaintiff regarding the disposition of the assets. It held that the plaintiff's claim of proprietary estoppel and estoppel by encouragement was not substantiated. The court relied on the decision in Flocas v Carlson [2015] VSC 221, which emphasised the need for a clear and unequivocal expectation for such claims to succeed. The court dismissed the plaintiff's proceeding, concluding that there was no basis for enforcing the alleged expectation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.