Re Collard
Case
•
[2018] WADC 1
•8 JANUARY 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Collard [2018] WADC 1
[2018] WADC 1
8 JANUARY 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this appeal, the applicant sought criminal injuries compensation following an incident of assault occasioning bodily harm. The applicant had previously asked the prosecutors not to proceed with the prosecution of the alleged perpetrator. The Court of Appeal was tasked with determining whether the claimant had reasonably done all they could to assist the prosecution, in accordance with the Criminal Injuries Compensation Act 2003. The primary issue before the court was whether the applicant's request to the prosecutors not to proceed with the case was a reasonable action under the circumstances. The court had to consider whether the applicant's actions were justifiable and whether there were any other factors that should have been taken into account.
The court found that the applicant's request to the prosecutors not to proceed with the prosecution was not a reasonable action in the circumstances. The court determined that the police had their own reasons for discontinuing the prosecution, which were not influenced by the applicant's request. The court held that the applicant should have taken further steps to ensure that the prosecution proceeded, as they had a duty to assist the authorities in bringing the alleged perpetrator to justice. The court further found that the applicant's failure to take such steps amounted to a failure to reasonably do all they could to assist the prosecution.
Consequently, the court dismissed the applicant's appeal and affirmed the decision of the primary tribunal to reject the claim for criminal injuries compensation. The court emphasised that the decision was based on the specific facts of the case and that each case would turn on its own facts. The court also noted that the applicant's request to the prosecutors not to proceed with the prosecution did not automatically entitle them to compensation, as there were other factors to consider.
The court did not make any further orders in relation to the case. The decision highlights the importance of taking reasonable steps to assist the prosecution in criminal cases, particularly where the victim has requested that the prosecution not proceed. The decision also emphasises that each case will turn on its own facts, and that the court will consider all relevant factors when determining whether a claim for criminal injuries compensation should be granted.
The court found that the applicant's request to the prosecutors not to proceed with the prosecution was not a reasonable action in the circumstances. The court determined that the police had their own reasons for discontinuing the prosecution, which were not influenced by the applicant's request. The court held that the applicant should have taken further steps to ensure that the prosecution proceeded, as they had a duty to assist the authorities in bringing the alleged perpetrator to justice. The court further found that the applicant's failure to take such steps amounted to a failure to reasonably do all they could to assist the prosecution.
Consequently, the court dismissed the applicant's appeal and affirmed the decision of the primary tribunal to reject the claim for criminal injuries compensation. The court emphasised that the decision was based on the specific facts of the case and that each case would turn on its own facts. The court also noted that the applicant's request to the prosecutors not to proceed with the prosecution did not automatically entitle them to compensation, as there were other factors to consider.
The court did not make any further orders in relation to the case. The decision highlights the importance of taking reasonable steps to assist the prosecution in criminal cases, particularly where the victim has requested that the prosecution not proceed. The decision also emphasises that each case will turn on its own facts, and that the court will consider all relevant factors when determining whether a claim for criminal injuries compensation should be granted.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Criminal Liability
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Re Collard [2018] WADC 1
Most Recent Citation
Re Potschick [2025] WADC 9
Cases Citing This Decision
30
Weatherill v Tiakia
[2025] WADC 26
Re Burleigh
[2025] WADC 11
Re Potschick
[2025] WADC 9
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
4
Simonsen v Legge
[2010] WASCA 238
Re Sullivan
[2017] WADC 17
Woodruffe v Northern Territory of Australia
[2000] NTCA 8