Re Centrebet International Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 20 min read

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Centrebet International Limited, in the matter of Centrebet International Limited [2011] FCA 870

Citation: Centrebet International Limited, in the matter of Centrebet International Limited [2011] FCA 870
Parties: CENTREBET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ACN 066 441 067
File number: NSD 1048 of 2011
Judge: EMMETT J
Date of judgment: 13 July 2011
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 411
Date of hearing: 13 July 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the plaintiff: M Oakes SC
Solicitor for the plaintiff: Clifford Chance
Counsel for Sbet Australia Pty Ltd: RM Foreman
Solicitor for Sbet Australia Pty Ltd: Addisons

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

GENERAL DIVISION

NSD 1048 of 2011

IN THE MATTER OF CENTREBET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ACN 066 441 067

CENTREBET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ACN 066 441 067

JUDGE:

EMMETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

13 JULY 2011

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. Pursuant to s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act):

(a)       the Plaintiff, Centrebet International Limited (Centrebet) convene:

(i)a meeting (Share Scheme Meeting) of the holders of shares in Centrebet (Shareholders) for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, agreeing (with or without modification) to a scheme of arrangement to be made between Centrebet and its Shareholders (Share Scheme); and

(ii)a meeting (Performance Right Scheme Meeting) of the holders of performance rights in Centrebet (Performance Rightholders) for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, agreeing (with or without modification) to a scheme of arrangement to be made between Centrebet and its Performance Rightholders (Performance Right Scheme);

(together, the Scheme Meetings), the Share Scheme and the Performance Right Scheme each being the schemes substantially in the form contained in the explanatory statement (Scheme Booklet) which is Exhibit 1 in the proceeding;

(b)the Share Scheme Meeting be held at 10.00 am on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 at The Justice and Police Museum, corner of Albert and Phillip Streets, Circular Quay, Sydney, NSW; and

(c)the Performance Right Scheme Meeting be held at the later of 10.30 am and the conclusion or adjournment of the Share Scheme Meeting, on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 at The Justice and Police Museum, corner of Albert and Phillip Streets, Circular Quay, Sydney, NSW.

2.Graham John Kelly, or failing him, Maxwell Christopher Donnelly, act as Chairperson of the Scheme Meetings.

3.The Chairperson appointed to the Scheme Meetings have power to adjourn the Scheme Meetings in his absolute discretion.

4.All voting at the Scheme Meetings be by poll as declared by the Chairperson, except for procedural motions.

5.Pursuant to subsection 411(1) of the Act, the Scheme Booklet be approved for distribution to Shareholders and Performance Rightholders.

6.Other than regulation 5.6.13 of the Corporations Regulations 2001, rule 2.15 of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (the Rules) shall not apply to the Scheme Meetings.

7.Notice of…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Re Centrebet International Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] FCA 870
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the case of Re Centrebet International Ltd involved the company Centrebet International Limited seeking to convene meetings for shareholders and performance rightholders to consider and potentially approve a scheme of arrangement. The legal issues before the Court related to the proper convening and conduct of these meetings, including the appointment of a chairperson, the process for voting, and the distribution of scheme booklets. Additionally, the case addressed the need for public notice of an application for the approval of the schemes.

The Court found that Centrebet had fulfilled the necessary statutory requirements under the Corporations Act 2001 for convening the meetings. It approved the appointment of Graham John Kelly, with Maxwell Christopher Donnelly as an alternative, as the chairperson of the meetings. The Court ruled that voting should be conducted by poll, except for procedural motions, and that the scheme booklet should be approved for distribution to shareholders and performance rightholders. Furthermore, the Court exempted the company from certain procedural rules to facilitate the expeditious handling of the matter.

As a result of the Court's decision, Centrebet was granted permission to convene the required meetings, with specific directives on the timing, location, and procedural aspects of the meetings. The Court also allowed for an exemption from certain procedural rules and mandated the publication of an advertisement regarding the application for approval of the schemes. The originating process was adjourned to a later date to accommodate these requirements.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act):

(a) the Plaintiff, Centrebet International Limited (Centrebet) convene:

(i) a meeting (Share Scheme Meeting) of the holders of shares in Centrebet (Shareholders) for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, agreeing (with or without modification) to a scheme of arrangement to be made between Centrebet and its Shareholders (Share Scheme); and

(ii) a meeting (Performance Right Scheme Meeting) of the holders of performance rights in Centrebet (Performance Rightholders) for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, agreeing (with or without modification) to a scheme of arrangement to be made between Centrebet and its Performance Rightholders (Performance Right Scheme);

(together, the Scheme Meetings), the Share Scheme and the Performance Right Scheme each being the schemes substantially in the form contained in the explanatory statement (Scheme Booklet) which is Exhibit 1 in the proceeding;

(b) the Share Scheme Meeting be held at 10.00 am on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 at The Justice and Police Museum, corner of Albert and Phillip Streets, Circular Quay, Sydney, NSW; and

(c) the Performance Right Scheme Meeting be held at the later of 10.30 am and the conclusion or adjournment of the Share Scheme Meeting, on Wednesday, 17 August 2011 at The Justice and Police Museum, corner of Albert and Phillip Streets, Circular Quay, Sydney, NSW.

2. Graham John Kelly, or failing him, Maxwell Christopher Donnelly, act as Chairperson of the Scheme Meetings.

3. The Chairperson appointed to the Scheme Meetings have power to adjourn the Scheme Meetings in his absolute discretion.

4. All voting at the Scheme Meetings be by poll as declared by the Chairperson, except for procedural motions.

5. Pursuant to subsection 411(1) of the Act, the Scheme Booklet be approved for distribution to Shareholders and Performance Rightholders.

6. Other than regulation 5.6.13 of the Corporations Regulations 2001, rule 2.15 of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (the Rules) shall not apply to the Scheme Meetings.

7. Notice of the hearing of an application pursuant to subsection 411(4)(b) of the Act for orders approving the Schemes be published by an advertisement substantially in the form of Annexure “A” to this order as shown to the Court, such advertisement to be published on or before 15 August 2011 in “The Australian” newspaper, and that Centrebet otherwise be exempted from compliance with rule 3.4 of the Rules.

8. The Originating Process filed on 28 June 2011 be adjourned to 9.30am on Monday, 22 August 2011.

9. Liberty to apply be granted on 2 days’ notice.

10. These orders be entered forthwith.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.