Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Re Carl Heinrich Schurr; and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1920] HCA 38
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court was the appropriate form of order to be made under section 9D(2) of the *Trading with the Enemy Act 1914-1916* to facilitate the payment of the mortgage debt and ensure the proper discharge of the mortgage. The Court was also required to determine the allocation of costs for the motion.
Starke J. reasoned that for the discharge of the mortgage to be effective, the order must stipulate that the mortgagee execute a proper discharge and deliver up all relevant title deeds and documents to the Public Trustee. The Court ordered that the Public Trustee be authorized to pay the principal, interest, and necessary costs, charges, and expenses to the mortgagee, Thomas Elford Edwards. This authorization was conditional upon Edwards executing a discharge of the mortgage and reconveying the mortgaged premises to the Public Trustee, free of encumbrances created by him, and delivering up all related documents upon oath. The costs of the Public Trustee and of Carl Heinrich Schurr were allowed out of the property held by the Public Trustee.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.