Re Butler, C.G. Ex Parte Vize, L

Case [1992] FCA 588


JUDGMENT No ... 58s.. J

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GENERAL DIVISION

BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF

THE STATE OF OUEENSLAND BN No. 703 of 1991

RE: CLIVE GEORGE BUTLER

Debtor

EX PARTE: LAUREL VIZE

Creditor

MINUTES OF ORDER

JUDGE W I N G ORDER:  Cooper J.
WHERE MADE:  Brisbane
DATE 
--  27 July, 1992
RIB COURT ORDERS THAT: 

The application to set aside the bankruptcy notice be dismissed and I order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application, including any reserved costs, to be taxed.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
GENERAL DIVISION
BANKRUPTCY DISTRICT OF

THE STATE OF OUEENSLAND BN No. 703 of 1991

RE: CLIVE GEORGE BUTLER

Debtor

EX PARTE: LAUREL VIZE

Creditor

Coram  Cooper J.
Place:  Brisbane
Date:  27 July, 1992
EX TEMPORE RWSONS FOR JUDGMENT

On 3 April, 1992 Clive George Butler made application to the Court to set aside a bankruptcy notice which had been served upon him. The application was originally returned before the Court on 24 April, 1992 and subsequently referred to a Judge of the Court by the Registrar.

On 12 June, 1992 notice of listing was sent by

ordinary pre-paid mail to the applicant's address at 3/19

matter would be heard today at 2.15 o'clock in the afternoon. Tombarra Street, Mooloolaba advising the applicant that the

The address at Tombarra Street is the address for service given by the applicant. The notification given by the court was not returned as unclaimed at that address.

In an affidavit filed by leave today Mrs. Mary Anne
Hill exhibits, amongst other things, copies of correspondence
sent to the applicant at the Tombarra Street address,

2 .   l

referring to today as the return date and hearing date of the application. She deposes in her material that the substantial material forwarded by her by pre-paid ordinary post has not been returned.

At 2.15 p.m. the applicant did not appear in this Court. Inquiries were made in the registry in the Court, on level 27 of the MLC complex, and, on level 8 of this building. The applicant was not present at any of those places. The applicant was called by the Court Officer and did not appear.

In the circumstances the respondent seeks the dismissal of the application and an order for costs.

I am satisfied on the material that the applicant has had notice of today's application and has not attended to prosecute his application. I am satisfied that I have power under Section 30(l)(b) of the Bankruptcv Act to make an order dismissing the application, for its non-prosecution, and also awarding costs against the applicant.

Accordingly, I order that the application to set aside the bankruptcy notice be dismissed and I order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application, including any reserved costs, to be taxed.

I certify that this and the preceding page

are a true copy of the reasons for

judgment herein of the Honourable Mr. I ; .- .
Justice Cooper.

Solicitor for Judgment Creditor/

Respondent:  Lees Marshal1 & Warnick
No appearance for Debtor. 
Details
AGLC
Re Butler, C.G. Ex Parte Vize, L [1992] FCA 588
Case
[1992] FCA 588
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Court of Australia, General Division, Bankruptcy District of the State of Queensland, was asked to decide whether to set aside a bankruptcy notice served on Clive George Butler. Laurel Vize, the creditor, had issued the notice and Butler sought to have it set aside. The matter was heard by Judge Cooper on 27 July 1992. The primary legal issue before the court was whether Butler had sufficient grounds to have the bankruptcy notice set aside, and if he had failed to appear for the hearing, whether the court had the power to dismiss the application and award costs against him.

The court considered that Butler had received proper notification of the hearing date via ordinary pre-paid mail to his address at Tombarra Street, Mooloolaba, which he had provided as his address for service. The court also noted that correspondence sent to that address had not been returned unclaimed, and the applicant did not appear in court despite being called. The court was satisfied that Butler had notice of the hearing and chose not to attend. Under Section 30(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act, the court has the power to dismiss an application for non-prosecution and award costs against the applicant. Therefore, the court dismissed Butler's application to set aside the bankruptcy notice and ordered him to pay Vize's costs of and incidental to the application, including any reserved costs, to be taxed.

This decision underscores the importance of proper notification and attendance at court hearings. The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application and award costs due to the applicant's non-appearance and failure to prosecute his application after proper notification.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.