Re Brett

Case [2021] VSC 10


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA Not Restricted

AT MELBOURNE

CRIMINAL DIVISION

S ECR 2021 0005

IN THE MATTER of the Bail Act 1977
and
IN THE MATTER of an application for bail by DANIEL BRETT

---

JUDGE:

INCERTI J

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

On the papers

DATE OF ORDERS:

21 January 2021

DATE OF REASONS

21 January 2021

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

Re Brett

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2021] VSC 10

---

CRIMINAL LAW – Application for Bail – Unopposed application – Parties consented to the application being determined on the papers – Exceptional circumstances that justify the grant of bail made out – No unacceptable risk – Bail granted with conditions – Bail Act 1977, ss 1B, 3AAA, 4AA, 4A, 4C, 4D and 4E.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Applicant No appearances Gallant Law
For the Respondent No appearances Victoria Police

HER HONOUR:

  1. This is an application for bail by Daniel Brett (‘the applicant’). 

  1. On 21 November 2020, the applicant was arrested by Leading Senior Constable Shane Bourke in relation to, amongst other things, a string of burglaries in regional Victorian towns between 5 and 14 November 2020. He was charged with the following offences:

·burglary (four charges);

·theft (four charges);

·committing an indictable offence whilst on bail (two charges);

·dealing with property suspected of being proceeds of crime (two charges);

·possessing a drug of dependence (cocaine);

·possessing a drug of dependence (methylamphetamine);

·possessing a drug of dependence (ecstasy);

·possessing a drug of dependence (cannabis);

·possessing house-breaking implements;

·possessing a prohibited weapon without exemption or approval;

·possessing a controlled weapon without exemption or approval;

·driving whilst disqualified;

·failing to stop vehicle on police request;

·speeding;

·attempted burglary; and

·possessing a drug of dependence (Viagra and Quetiapine);

·handling stolen goods (two charges).

  1. At the time of the alleged offending, the applicant was serving a community correction order (‘CCO’), imposed in the Melbourne County Court on 16 October 2020, for offences of committing an indictable offence whilst on bail; dealing with property suspected of being proceeds of crime; driving whilst authorisation suspended (two charges); knowingly deal with proceeds of crime; possessing a prohibited weapon without exemption or approval; possessing a drug of dependence (two charges); possessing a controlled weapon without excuse; and trafficking a drug of dependence.

  1. In addition, the applicant was on summons in two separate matters.  First, in relation to an incident on 29 July 2020, involving charges of using a vehicle without number plates; failing to keep a safe distance behind another vehicle; careless driving; driving whilst disqualified and using an unregistered vehicle (‘the Informant Williams matter’).  Second, in relation to an incident on 9 September 2020, involving charges of driving whilst suspended and using an unregistered vehicle (‘the Informant Garbutt matter’).

  1. The applicant has been in custody since the date of his arrest on 21 November 2020.  He has previously been refused bail, in the Shepparton Magistrates’ Court, on 8 January 2021.  The Magistrate on that occasion was not satisfied of the…

Continue reading Re Brett

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Re Brett [2021] VSC 10
Case
[2021] VSC 10
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Re Brett, the applicant sought bail under the Bail Act 1977 in the ACT Magistrates Court. Brett, the applicant, was facing criminal charges and had made an unopposed application for bail. Both parties agreed to the application being decided on the submitted documents, without the need for a hearing. The primary legal issue before the court was whether exceptional circumstances existed that would justify the granting of bail, given the serious nature of the charges against Brett.

The court considered the provisions of the Bail Act 1977, including sections 1B, 3AAA, 4AA, 4A, 4C, 4D, and 4E, to assess whether the exceptional circumstances criterion was met. The court examined the evidence provided and concluded that there were no unacceptable risks associated with granting bail. The decision hinged on the evidence of exceptional circumstances, which the court found to be sufficiently compelling to warrant the granting of bail despite the gravity of the charges.

Consequently, the court granted Brett's application for bail, imposing specific conditions to ensure compliance and mitigate any potential risks. These conditions were tailored to address the concerns raised by the seriousness of the charges while allowing Brett the opportunity to prepare his defence on bail. The court's decision was firmly grounded in the statutory framework provided by the Bail Act 1977, reflecting a careful balance between the rights of the applicant and the interests of the community.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [42]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.