Re Boart Longyear Ltd
Case
•
[2019] FCA 62
•1 February 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Boart Longyear Ltd [2019] FCA 62
[2019] FCA 62
1 February 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Boart Longyear Limited (BLY) sought approval from the Federal Court of Australia for a scheme of arrangement to effect the company's re-domiciliation from Australia to Canada. The scheme was approved by over 75% of shareholders who voted, but failed the headcount test under section 411(4)(a)(ii)(A) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The Court was asked to decide whether to exercise its discretion to approve the scheme despite the headcount test failure. Another issue was whether communications sent by a shareholder prior to the scheme meeting affected the integrity of the vote. The Court also considered whether approval of the scheme would deprive minority shareholders of their standing to seek relief under section 234 of the Corporations Act.
The Court held that it would not exercise its discretion to approve the scheme unless the company conducted a further poll of members with corrective disclosure and the scheme satisfied both statutory majorities. The Court found that a communication sent by a shareholder to other members of the company prior to the scheme meeting did not affect the integrity of the vote. The Court also held that approving the scheme would not deprive minority shareholders of their standing to seek relief under section 234 of the Corporations Act. The company proffered a satisfactory undertaking designed to preserve shareholders’ standing.
The Court approved the communication sent by BLY to its shareholders concerning the Snowside letter and the court’s decision related to the Oppression Proceedings. The Court adjourned the application and listed the matter for case management on 7 February 2019.
The Court held that it would not exercise its discretion to approve the scheme unless the company conducted a further poll of members with corrective disclosure and the scheme satisfied both statutory majorities. The Court found that a communication sent by a shareholder to other members of the company prior to the scheme meeting did not affect the integrity of the vote. The Court also held that approving the scheme would not deprive minority shareholders of their standing to seek relief under section 234 of the Corporations Act. The company proffered a satisfactory undertaking designed to preserve shareholders’ standing.
The Court approved the communication sent by BLY to its shareholders concerning the Snowside letter and the court’s decision related to the Oppression Proceedings. The Court adjourned the application and listed the matter for case management on 7 February 2019.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
Legal Concepts
-
Scheme of Arrangement
-
Shareholder Approval
-
Headcount Test
-
Unfair Prejudice
-
Oppression
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Re Boart Longyear Ltd [2019] FCA 62
Most Recent Citation
Commissioner of State Revenue v Gleeson, in the matter of Dalma Form Specialist Pty Ltd (subject to deed of company arrangement) [2024] FCA 908
Cases Citing This Decision
26
In the matter of Sumo Australia Limited
[2020] NSWSC 1142
In the matter of Sumo Australia Limited
[2020] NSWSC 1142
Low v Joondalup Golf Management (Aust) Pty Ltd
[2023] WASCA 33
Cases Cited
31
Statutory Material Cited
5
Re Boart Longyear Ltd (No 2)
[2017] NSWSC 1105
In the matter of Boart Longyear Limited
[2017] NSWSC 756
Re Capilano Honey Ltd
[2018] FCA 1568