Re BIS Finance Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2017] NSWSC 1713
•08 December 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re BIS Finance Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1713
[2017] NSWSC 1713
08 December 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
BIS Finance Pty Ltd was the subject of an application by two of its creditors for an order convening meetings of creditors to consider proposed schemes of arrangement. The applicants sought an order under section 411(2)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to convene meetings of creditors. The defendants, BIS Finance and its related entities, did not oppose the application. The court was required to determine whether the requirements to order the scheme meetings were satisfied, including whether the applicants had standing to make the application and whether the schemes provided for the fair and equitable treatment of creditors.
The court found that the applicants had standing to make the application as they were creditors with provable claims exceeding $20,000 each. The court also found that the proposed schemes provided for the fair and equitable treatment of creditors, as they involved a debt-to-equity swap, a standstill period, and variation of loan documentation. The court noted that the schemes were interdependent and that the proposed restructuring was in the best interests of the company and its creditors. The court was satisfied that the requirements to order the scheme meetings were met and made the orders sought by the applicants.
The court appointed a foreign representative to act on behalf of a creditor that held assets in a foreign jurisdiction. The orders included convening meetings of creditors to consider the proposed schemes of arrangement and appointing the foreign representative. The court also made orders for the service of documents and the provision of information to creditors. The orders were made in accordance with the provisions of the Corporations Act.
The court found that the applicants had standing to make the application as they were creditors with provable claims exceeding $20,000 each. The court also found that the proposed schemes provided for the fair and equitable treatment of creditors, as they involved a debt-to-equity swap, a standstill period, and variation of loan documentation. The court noted that the schemes were interdependent and that the proposed restructuring was in the best interests of the company and its creditors. The court was satisfied that the requirements to order the scheme meetings were met and made the orders sought by the applicants.
The court appointed a foreign representative to act on behalf of a creditor that held assets in a foreign jurisdiction. The orders included convening meetings of creditors to consider the proposed schemes of arrangement and appointing the foreign representative. The court also made orders for the service of documents and the provision of information to creditors. The orders were made in accordance with the provisions of the Corporations Act.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
-
Insolvency Law
Legal Concepts
-
Debt-to-Equity Swap
-
Standstill Period
-
Variation of Loan Documentation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Re BIS Finance Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1713
Most Recent Citation
Selfwealth Ltd, in the matter of Selfwealth Ltd [2025] FCA 214
Cases Citing This Decision
1,096
Mighty River International Ltd v Hughes
[2018] HCA 38
Mighty River International Ltd v Hughes
[2018] HCA 38
Mighty River International Ltd v Hughes
[2018] HCA 38
Cases Cited
32
Statutory Material Cited
4
Re Boart Longyear Ltd
[2017] NSWSC 567
Re Boart Longyear Ltd (No 2)
[2017] NSWSC 1105
Re Boart Longyear Ltd
[2017] NSWSC 567