Re Bird, Alex Neville (as Trustee of the estate of Yiangos Arcadiou, a bankrupt) Ex parte Tasmanian Board Mills Ltd (trading as Country and Western)

Case [1980] FCA 8


Bankruptcy Act 1'356 s.122 - paycc

h a v l n g fails5 t o

p r o v e

t h a t

it h a s a

pay<? I n t h r

o l d l n a r y c,frurSe of

bus l r . e s s ,

paynex t

hav lng been

r e c e ~ v c d

85 a

r c z u l t

of

s t a t e m e n t madc

by

paycc

a t 2

x e t l n g of

c c r t a l n

of

t h e b a n k r u p t ' s c r e d l t o r s

21.6 a s a

r e s u l t of

t h e

l s s u e a n d

service of

a wr1 L,

p a y m n t declare6 void

a g a i n s t

t h e t r u s t e e

of

t h e e s t a t e

of

t h e m n k r u p t

as

a

p r e f e r e n c e .

SliECNEY J.

19

DECEFBER

1 3 7 9

IN TlIE FEDERAL CCURT

OF

AUS'??:\Lii>

-

GENERAL DIVISION

L

No. 6 8 of 1517

EX PARTE:

TASI4ANII.N

EOARD MILLS LTD.

trading ;IS Councry

and

Wcsttrn.

JUDGE

X A K I N G

ORDER :

SWEENEiI

J .

WHERE :V:DE:

MELBOURNE

DATE OF ORDER:

19 DECEMBEP 1979

Tnz covm DECLARE

THAT:

.

The

p a y m n t of

$ 1 5 , 0 0 0

maclc

by

t h e b a n k r u p t

t o the

r e s p o n d e n t

o n

28 Sep tember ,

1 9 7 6 and

the

paymc,l t

of

$ 5 , 0 0 0

made

by

t h c

b a n k r u p t

t o t h e

r e s p o n d e n t

on

9

Oc tobe r

1 9 7 6 are

v o l d

a s a g a l n s t

t h c a p p l l c a r ~ t

as

t r u s t e e of

t h e p r o p c r t y

of

chc!

b a n k n i p t

a n d

orders

t h a t

t h 2 L e s p o n d c n t

pay

t o t h e

applicant

t h e

sa;?

of

$ 2 0 , 0 0 0 .

I t

1 s f u r t h e r

o r c k r c d

t h a t

t n c

r c spo>x l?n t

p a y

t h e a p p l l c a n t ' s

costs

o€ a n d

l n c l d e n t a l

t c

t h e

a p p l l c a t l o n ,

l r ! c l u d l n g

r e s c r v e d

costs ,

such

cost:

t o

h e

t a x e d

if

n o t a g r e e d . L l t c r t y

2 S

rescr17ct-l

t o

e l t h e r p a r t y t o a p p l y .

, ' .

No.

6 8 of

1 9 7 7

Applicant

Respondent

REASCiiS

F O R J LiDG."INT

. .

.

.2/

L .

T h e

r e s - Jonden t

base<

i t s notlccA of intention CO

oppose

t h e a s p l i c a t l o n

on

the

c j rounds :

" ( a )

t h a t

t h e

paym2:lts

r e f e r r e d

t o

I n

t h e a p p l l c a t l o n

dlcl

no t

h a v ?

t h e

e f f ec t

of

glvln; .

the

Fcspondent

a

p r e f e r e n c e

priority

o r a d v a n t a g e

over

c r e d i t o r s o f

t h e B a n k r u p t .

( b )

t h a t

h e

s a i d

p 2 : m e n t s

a r e

n o t

deemed

t o h a v e l r e l a t l o n b x k t o

t h e 2 0 t h d a y

of

September ,

1 9 7 6

as

a l l e c j e d

i n

t h e s a l d n p p l l c a t l o n

or a t

a l l .

( c )

t h a t a t t h e tlne

t h a t

t h e

sal2

payments were r:a<r

t h e E x k r u p t

was

n o t l n s o l v e n t .

"

A t

t h e h e a r i n g , o n

the

a p p l i c a t i o n

of

Mr

H . H .

Cdxie ,

of

c o u n s e l

f o r

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t ,

l e a v e w a s g l v e n

t o

t h e

r e s > a x d c n t

t o

a d d

t h e

f o l l o w i n g g r o u n d :

t h a t t h e r e s p o n d c n t

1s

and

a t a l l

times mdterlal was a paycc 111 good

f a i t h a n d f o r v a l u a b l e c o n s l d e r a t i o n

, a n d

i n

t h e 0 r d l : l d r y

c ~ u r r e

cf

b u s i n e s s w l t h l n

t h e 7 . e a n i n g

of

sec .12 .2(2)

an:!

( 4 ) and nccordlngly

l i e s o u t s i d e th? a n b i t of

s ~ b - s e c .

( 2 )

'I

of

t h a t s e c t i o n .

I t was

common

ground

L e t w e n

t h e p a r t i e s t h a t t h e

b a n k r u p t

made

payments

t o

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t

of

$ 1 5 , 0 9 0

ox

28 September a n 2 of

$5,000

on

'3

Octohe r

1 9 7 5 in

r e s p e c t o f

a

d e b t

of

$25,000

w i n c t ,

h e

owed

t o t h e r e s p o n d e n t .

The

rcs;>ondent

by

l t s n o t l c e 05

I n t e n t i o n to

nppoce

the

a p p l i c a t i o n p u t

I n

l s sue

thc

c ; U e s t i G n

whe the r

these

p a : / , ~ , ~ r t 5

h a d t h e e f f e c t

of

g1v1.1:g

t h e rct,;pondent

2

:>refcrenc:r?

p r l c r l t y or

a d v a n t a g e

o v e r

t h e

o t h e r

c r e d l x o r s

of

= h 1 3

aa.nlrrupt.

T h c

e v i d e n c e

of

the

ap :3 l lcant ,

which

I

a c c e p t ,

plainly

e s t a b l l c h e 5

t h a t e a c h o f t h e p a y m e n t s h a d t h l s e f f e c t .

The

r e s p o n d e n t a l s o c o n t e n d e d t h a t

ar. t h time

05

cach

o

f

t he payn ' cn t s

t he ba .nk r l+ t

w?s

n o t u n z b l c

t o

pay

h; S

debts as t h e y bccamc! c?ue f r o n 111s cr:rn

mcney,

wrthln

thc

rcc:r! lnq

Of

s.122

of

t h e B x k r u p t c y

A c t 1366.

The meaning t o b?

g r v e n t o tnesc words

has

been

laid

down

i n H y m n Concrete P t y .

L t 2 .

v

G a r r l t t y

( 1 9 7 7 )

1 3 A . L . R .

3 2 1 .

A t pp 327-8 Zacobs J . said:

. . .

/ 4

1.

Barwlck C . J .

and

Glbbs

J .

c o n c u r r e d

I n

t h e

]ui!wer.t

of JacoSs J.

The

t e s t

so

approv-:?

111 t h e Eynnx

C c n c r r t e P t y .

L t d .

c a s e 1 s es?ressecl

111 thc!

worcis

of

G l - ~ f f l t h

C . J .

( 1 9 0 7 4

CLR

a t p

1 5 2 8 ) :

5

The

t es t

a s

fo rm- la t ed

by

I s a a c s J .

( a t p

1 5 4 3 )

was:

. . .6/

6 .

7 .

I c.ould cstlmatc that 111th ?,royer

su?pIy

of

lakour

a n J m a t e r l a l

I t would

have

t a k e n o n e

t o t!,o

rro!lt i ls

t o

conq ' l e t e

so!ne

of

t h e h o u s e s

and

trio

t o three .nonths

t o

con2 lc t e

t he

r e1aa in l r . y

ones.

6 .

TYAI' - I

havc had

a

cjrcat

dea l

O F

e x p e r i e n c e

111

v a l u l n q

: - e a 1

e s t z t c an< ,:lso

b u l l d ~ n g

works i n Froqress.

111 addition t o havlnn;

t h e qualifications of

b e l n g a

trEstee i n

b a n k r u p t c y a n d

official

liquidator

and

a

c h a r t e r s d a c c s u n t z n t ,

I

hcivc

gair .ed

a

g rea t

dea l of

e x > c r l c n c e a s

t o

rea l

e s t a t e

v a l u e s ,

b u i i d l n c j

works

la

p r o g r e s s

and

mor tgage

l L a b l l i t l . - s

by

r e a s o n

of

hav lng

b e e n f o r

a

pried

of

t w e a t y y e a r s

assoclztee

w l t h

the

building

i n d u s t r y

( l n c l u c h i i g

p e r s o n a l l y h a v l n g p e r f o r m e d

work

a s

a

b u l i d c r ) a n d

a lso by

redson

of

hav ing

been

for a period of two or t h r c c y e a r s

a board

mexbcr

of

t h e H o u s i n g a u l l d c r s R e g l s t r y

Board.

7.

TI3AT

from

t h e

i n f o r m o t l o n

2 r o v l G c d

t o

me

by

t h e b a n k r u p t a n d f r o ~ c t h 2

enr;ulr;es

t h a t

I

h a v e p e r s o n a l l y

maze

a n d

Fro3

thf

e x a a l n a t l o c

of

t h e books

2nd

r e c o r d s of

t h e b a n k r u p t

I

h a v e p r e p a r e d

a

S t a t c w n t of

Assets

an:!

L l c b l l i t l e s

of

t h e

b a n k r u p t

a5

a t t h e

1 5 t h

Septenlber ,

1976.

>!CV FrodJcecl

znri

sho..n

;o

me

a t t h e

tlme

of

s w c a r l n q t h l s

~y

P. t f l .davl t

and narked with

t h e 1 c t ~ c r

" A "

1s

tr.e

5 2 1 L

S t a t e K e n t o f

A s s e t s

n:ld

L l a b l l l t : e s . "

$1 ,G29,476

-

LCSS

-

Advances

secured

by

mortgage:-

-

All iance

Acccptance

Corp .

L tX.

$

1 2 5 , 3 9 5

-

B e i > c < l c l a l

F i n a n T e

C o .

Ltd.

268,

0 C G

-

C o f u r e

P t y .

L t d .

105 ,500

-

G u a r d > a x

I n v e s t r , s n t s

P t y .

Ltd.

460,ltE

_-

959,593

$ 69,812

on

Stock

Hand

$

40,oocl

Amounts

due

o n

C o n t r a c t

of

S a l e

2 9 , 0 0 0 -

h9,000_

$

1 3 6 . 5 1 2

8 1

.

8.

LIABILITIES

-

A . N . Z .

Bank

$

43,000

-

Less

:.:Jrtszge

security

$

2 > , c 3 0

$ 18,000

T r a d e

C r c c h t o r s

251,964

O t h e r C r e d i t o r s : -

- Land Tas

$

6,274

- Income Tax

1 5 , 5 5 3

-

I n t e r e s t

Accrusd

11 ,500

33 ,327

3 0 3 , 2 3 1

$

164 ,479

CONTINGE?;? ASSETS

E q u l t y

i n

l a n d p u r c h a s e d u n d e r

d

c o n t r a c t

o f

sale.

50 ,000

-

$

112 ,479"

__

The applicant's acc0ur . t of

t h e s t a t e

of

t h e

b a n k r u p t ' s a f f a l r s

cor.tlr.ucZ

as

follows:

. .

. g /

9 .

,

. .10/

10.

i m e r i c n P l a s t e r

53 h'heatshecs Road, Glenrof

6 , C i G . G O

N. Nlcopoulos,

5 3 May

S t r e e t , ;;arLh

Altona

. . .11/

..

.

.

.12/

.

. .13/

r

..

13.

. .

.14/

..

14.

15.

16.

t h a t

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t

p a y

t!:n

a p p l ; c a i , t ' s c o s t s

of

a n d

l n c l d s n t ? ?

t o

t h e a p p l l c a t i o n ,

l n c l u d l n g

rcserved

costs,

s u c h c o s t s

t o h

L

t a x e d li n o t agreed.

Liberty 1 s rcscrvcd t o cltl.er p c r t y L~

apply .

4

Details
AGLC
Re Bird, Alex Neville (as Trustee of the estate of Yiangos Arcadiou, a bankrupt) Ex parte Tasmanian Board Mills Ltd (trading as Country and Western) [1980] FCA 8
Case
[1980] FCA 8
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, General Division, the case of Re Bird, Alex Neville (as Trustee of the estate of Yiangos Arcadiou, a bankrupt) Ex parte Tasmanian Board Mills Ltd (trading as Country and Western) was heard. The central issue was whether payments made by the bankrupt to the respondent constituted preferences under the Bankruptcy Act 1966. Specifically, the court had to determine if the payments of $15,000 on 28 September 1976 and $5,000 on 9 October 1976 gave the respondent a preference over other creditors of the bankrupt.

The respondent argued that the payments did not give it a preference, that the payments were not related to the 20th of September 1976, and that the bankrupt was not insolvent at the time of the payments. At the hearing, the respondent added that it had acted in good faith and for valuable consideration, thus falling outside the scope of the relevant section of the Bankruptcy Act. The court accepted the applicant's evidence that the payments did indeed give the respondent a preference over other creditors. Additionally, the respondent contended that the bankrupt was solvent at the time of the payments, but this argument was not upheld based on the established criteria for insolvency.

The court found that the respondent had a preference over other creditors and that the bankrupt was insolvent at the relevant times. Consequently, the payments were void, and the respondent was ordered to repay the amounts to the trustee of the bankrupt's estate, along with costs. The court reserved the right for either party to apply for costs not agreed upon.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.