Re Bali Brassiere Co Inc's Registered Trade Mark
Case
•
[1968] HCA 72
•6 November 1968
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Re Bali Brassiere Co Inc's Registered Trade Mark [1968] HCA 72
[1968] HCA 72
6 November 1968
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The dispute before Windeyer J in the Supreme Court of New South Wales concerned an application to register the trade mark "Bali Brassiere Co Inc" for brassieres. The applicant, Bali Brassiere Co Inc, sought to register this mark, but the Registrar of Trade Marks opposed the registration on the grounds that the mark was deceptive and likely to deceive or cause confusion as to the origin of the goods.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the proposed trade mark was deceptive or likely to deceive or cause confusion within the meaning of the relevant trade marks legislation. Specifically, the Court had to determine if the use of the word "Bali" in conjunction with "Brassiere Co Inc" would lead consumers to believe that the brassieres originated from Bali, when in fact they were manufactured in the United States.
Windeyer J reasoned that the word "Bali" was not merely descriptive of the goods themselves, but rather indicated a geographical origin. His Honour considered that the public would likely associate the word "Bali" with the island of Bali, known for its distinctive cultural products. The Court found that the applicant's use of "Bali" in its trade mark was intended to suggest a connection with that geographical location, and that such a suggestion would be misleading given the actual place of manufacture. The legal principle applied was that a trade mark is deceptive if it falsely represents the origin of goods, thereby misleading the public.
The Court ultimately dismissed the application for registration of the trade mark.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the proposed trade mark was deceptive or likely to deceive or cause confusion within the meaning of the relevant trade marks legislation. Specifically, the Court had to determine if the use of the word "Bali" in conjunction with "Brassiere Co Inc" would lead consumers to believe that the brassieres originated from Bali, when in fact they were manufactured in the United States.
Windeyer J reasoned that the word "Bali" was not merely descriptive of the goods themselves, but rather indicated a geographical origin. His Honour considered that the public would likely associate the word "Bali" with the island of Bali, known for its distinctive cultural products. The Court found that the applicant's use of "Bali" in its trade mark was intended to suggest a connection with that geographical location, and that such a suggestion would be misleading given the actual place of manufacture. The legal principle applied was that a trade mark is deceptive if it falsely represents the origin of goods, thereby misleading the public.
The Court ultimately dismissed the application for registration of the trade mark.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Commercial Law
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Murray Goulbourn Co-operative Co Ltd v The NSW Dairy Corporation [1990] FCA 25
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Barrett v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
[1968] HCA 59
Apple Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks
[2014] FCA 1304