Re: Angela (Special Medical Procedure)

Link copied
Case Copied 15 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

RE: ANGELA (SPECIAL MEDICAL PROCEDURE) [2010] FamCA 98
FAMILY LAW - Special medical procedures - best interest of the child - hysterectomy for 11 year old girl
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
The Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v J W B and S M B [1992] HCA 15; (1992) 175 CLR 218 (6 May 1992) (Marion’s case)
APPLICANT: The Mother and The Father
Concerning a Child, Angela
FILE NUMBER OMITTED
DATE DELIVERED: 16 February 2010
PLACE DELIVERED: Brisbane
PLACE HEARD: Brisbane
JUDGMENT OF: THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE CRONIN
HEARING DATE: 16 FEBRUARY 2010

NAMES OF REPRESENTATIVES OMITTED

Orders

IT IS DECLARED:

  1. That the performance of a hysterectomy on ANGELA is in the child’s best interests.

IT IS ORDERED:

  1. That the Court authorises the performance of the procedure in paragraph (1) in the State of Queensland.

  2. To the extent it is necessary to do so, the mother is authorised to consent to the said medical procedure.

  3. That the solicitor for the applicant serve a copy of these orders and in due course the reasons, on the Director General, Department of Communities and the Director General, Queensland Health.

  4. That otherwise all outstanding applications are dismissed.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Re: Angela (Special medical procedure) is approved pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE

FILE NUMBER OMITTED

The Mother and The Father

Applicant

And

Concerning a Child Angela

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. Angela is almost 12 years of age.  She has Rett Syndrome.  For some years, her doctors have endeavoured to treat her to improve her life.  That has been largely unsuccessful.  What is now proposed is a hysterectomy which I accept will improve her quality of life.  Because of the irreversible nature of the surgery procedure, Queensland Health has required a court approval.  The court has given that for the reasons set out below.

Background

  1. Angela is the third child of the mother and the father.  The mother and father married in South America and came to Australia in 1991.  All three of their children were born here. 

  2. All of the evidence points to the admirable parenting task that the mother and father have fulfilled since Angela’s birth.  It has been a loving but onerous task because since her third birthday, Angela has been diagnosed with Retts Syndrome.

  3. Retts Syndrome is a progressive neurological disorder that results in severe intellectual impairment, physical impairment and epilepsy.  In this case, Angela has all of those difficulties.

The evidence

  1. The mother swore an affidavit which was filed and read into the proceedings.

  2. The mother said that Angela cannot talk and has neither the coordination or the mental faculties to be able to use sign language.  Communication is therefore limited.  Angela acts as a three month old baby would. 

  3. The mother said that Angela has some movement in her arms and legs but cannot control that movement.  She has to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Re: Angela (Special Medical Procedure) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2010] FamCA 98
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Queensland, in the matter of *Re: Angela (Special Medical Procedure)*, considered an application concerning a child named Angela. The dispute centred on whether a hysterectomy was in Angela's best interests and whether the court should authorise its performance.

The central legal issue before Cronin J was to determine if the proposed medical procedure, a hysterectomy, was in the best interests of the child, Angela. This required the court to weigh the potential benefits and risks of the surgery against Angela's overall welfare and autonomy, considering her specific circumstances.

Cronin J applied the paramount principle of the child's best interests in making medical decisions. The court's reasoning, though not fully detailed in the provided extract, led to the conclusion that the hysterectomy was indeed in Angela's best interests. Consequently, the court declared its authorisation for the procedure to be performed in Queensland and further authorised Angela's mother to consent to the surgery on her behalf. The court also ordered that copies of the orders and reasons be served on relevant government departments and dismissed all other outstanding applications.

Orders

Orders of the court

IT IS DECLARED:

1.

That the performance of a hysterectomy on ANGELA is in the child’s best interests.

IT IS ORDERED:

2.

That the Court authorises the performance of the procedure in paragraph (1) in the State of Queensland.

3.

To the extent it is necessary to do so, the mother is authorised to consent to the said medical procedure.

4.

That the solicitor for the applicant serve a copy of these orders and in due course the reasons, on the Director General, Department of Communities and the Director General, Queensland Health.

5.

That otherwise all outstanding applications are dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.