FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Re: Addison (No. 3) [2021] FamCA 232
File number(s): File number has been suppressed Judgment of: HOWARD J Date of judgment: 22 April 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – MEDICAL PROCEDURES – Application for stage 2 treatment for gender dysphoria – where the mother has applied to proceed on an ex parte basis – where the father has not been named as a party to the proceedings – where there are allegations of family violence – application to proceed ex parte dismissed – where the Court ordered that the father be joined as a Respondent and further ordered that the father be served with the application Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 61C, 67ZC, 68LA
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) rr 1.12, 4.08, 7.04
Cases cited: Re Shane (Gender Dysphoria) [2013] FamCA 864;
Re Jordan [2015] FamCA 175
Re Lucas [2016] FamCA 1129
Re Mackenzie [2016] FamCA 610
In the Marriage of Sieling (1979) 24 ALR 357
In the Marriage of Kennedy (1993) 17 Fam LR 324
Re Lucy (Gender Dysphoria) (2013) 49 Fam LR 540
Ansah v Ansah [1977] 2 All ER 638
International Finance Trust Co Ltd v New South Wales Crime Commission (2009) 240 CLR 319
Re Imogen(No. 6) (2020) 61 Fam LR 344
Number of paragraphs: 59 Date of last submission/s: 20 April 2021 Date of hearing: 20 April 2021 Representation: The names of legal practitioners have been suppressed ORDERS
THE MOTHER
Applicant
AND: INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER
ORDER MADE BY:
HOWARD J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 APRIL 2021
THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:
1.That the Application to dispense with Rule 4.08(2) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) is dismissed.
2.That the father be joined in these proceedings as the Respondent.
3.That the Application to proceed ex parte is dismissed.
4.That the Amended Initiating Application and the Affidavits of the mother (redacted in accordance with the Reasons for Judgment delivered 22 April 2021) be served on the father along with a written notice from the mother’s solicitors in accordance with the Reasons for Judgment delivered 22 April 2021.
5.That the Applicant mother and the Independent Children’s Lawyer provide to the Court draft further orders or directions consistent with the Reasons for Judgment and also provide to the Court a draft order in appropriate terms to protect the identity of the child, the mother, the child’s family and the State or Territory in which the child lives within two (2) business days.
IT IS NOTED:
A.That the provisions of section 121 of the Family Law Act 1975 apply and restrict the publication of these Reasons and Orders and any aspect of these proceedings
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to…
Continue reading Re: Addison (No. 3)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re: Addison (No. 3) [2021] FamCA 232
- Case
- [2021] FamCA 232
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the mother should be permitted to proceed ex parte, thereby dispensing with the requirement to join the father as a party and serve him with the application. This involved considering the implications of the alleged family violence and the need to protect the child's identity.
Howard J dismissed the mother's application to proceed ex parte and to dispense with rule 4.08(2) of the *Family Law Rules 2004* (Cth). The court reasoned that the father ought to be joined as a respondent to the proceedings. Consequently, the court ordered that the father be joined as the respondent and that he be served with the amended initiating application and the mother's affidavits, along with a notice from the mother's solicitors. The court also directed the parties to provide draft orders for further directions and for the protection of the identities of the child, mother, child's family, and the relevant state or territory.
Orders
Orders of the court
THE MOTHER
Applicant
AND:
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER
ORDER MADE BY:
HOWARD J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 APRIL 2021
THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:
1. That the Application to dispense with Rule 4.08(2) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) is dismissed.
2. That the father be joined in these proceedings as the Respondent.
3. That the Application to proceed ex parte is dismissed.
4. That the Amended Initiating Application and the Affidavits of the mother (redacted in accordance with the Reasons for Judgment delivered 22 April 2021) be served on the father along with a written notice from the mother’s solicitors in accordance with the Reasons for Judgment delivered 22 April 2021.
5. That the Applicant mother and the Independent Children’s Lawyer provide to the Court draft further orders or directions consistent with the Reasons for Judgment and also provide to the Court a draft order in appropriate terms to protect the identity of the child, the mother, the child’s family and the State or Territory in which the child lives within two (2) business days.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.