| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted |
AT MELBOURNE
COMMERCIAL COURT
CORPORATIONS LIST
S ECI 2022 05111
IN THE MATTER of ABHG CONTRACTING PTY LTD (ACN 160 008 22) & Ors (according to the attached schedule)
| SCANIA FINANCE AUSTRALIA (ACN 609 637 596) | Plaintiff |
---
JUDGE: | ATTIWILL J |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne |
DATE OF HEARING: | 28 April 2023 (further submissions filed 5 May 2023) |
DATE OF JUDGMENT: | 19 May 2023 |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | Re ABHG Contracting Pty Ltd & Ors |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2023] VSC 263 |
---
CORPORATIONS – Security interests – Registration – Application to extend time pursuant to s 588FM of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – Where grantors not joined as defendants but given notice – Inadvertence in registration – Where security interest initially registered against grantor trustees’ ACN, not ABN – No apparent prejudice to secured creditors – Risk of prejudice to unsecured creditors protected by order reserving leave to vary or discharge order – Where likely that unsecured creditors were aware of plaintiff’s invalid registration and therefore did not act on basis of grantor being unencumbered - Joinder of grantors as defendants to the proceeding - Application granted on conditions, including order reserving leave to vary or discharge order – ss 588FL, 588FM of the Corporations Act (Cth) – In the matter of Accolade Wines Australia Limited and other companies [2016] NSWSC 1023 applied.
COMMERCIAL LAW – Personal Property Securities – Application to extend time for registration of purchase money security interests pursuant to s 293 of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) – Inadvertence in registration – Where security interest initially registered against grantor trustees’ ACN, not ABN – Where other secured creditors with perfected security interests granted by the same grantor in the same collateral given notice of proceeding – Where likely that other secured creditors were aware of plaintiff’s invalid registration and therefore did not act on basis of grantor being unencumbered – Joinder of secured creditors as defendants to the proceeding - Application granted on conditions, including order reserving leave to vary or discharge order – ss 62, 293 of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) - In the matter of Accolade Wines Australia Limited and other companies [2016] NSWSC 1023 applied.
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Plaintiff | Mr C R Brown with Ms R N Malone | Holley Nethercote Lawyers |
HIS HONOUR:
INTRODUCTION
The plaintiff, Scania Finance Australia Pty Ltd (Scania Finance), by originating process filed 12 December 2022, applied for orders that:
(a) under s 588FM of the Corporations Act2001 (Cth) (the Corporations Act) specified dates be fixed as the registration time for the purposes of s 588FL(2)(b)(iv) of the Corporations Act in respect of collateral in which Scania Finance was granted a security interest arising out financing agreements entered into with the eight grantor entities listed in the originating process (grantors);
(b) pursuant to s 293 of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) (the PPSA
Continue reading Re ABHG Contracting Pty Ltd & Ors
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Re ABHG Contracting Pty Ltd & Ors [2023] VSC 263
- Case
- [2023] VSC 263
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine whether the applications could proceed under sections 588FM and 293 of the Corporations Act and Personal Property Securities Act, respectively, given the inadvertent registration errors and the absence of apparent prejudice to secured creditors. The court considered the risk to unsecured creditors, which was mitigated by the order reserving leave to vary or discharge the orders if needed. The court also relied on the decision in the matter of Accolade Wines Australia Limited and other companies, where similar issues were addressed, to guide its reasoning.
After considering the evidence and arguments, the court granted the applications on conditions, including an order that reserved the leave to vary or discharge the orders. This decision ensured that any potential prejudice to unsecured creditors could be addressed if necessary. The conditions reflected a balanced approach, recognising the inadvertent nature of the errors and the lack of actual prejudice, while safeguarding the interests of all parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.