RAYNOR & RAYNOR
Case
•
[2020] FamCA 951
•19 November 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
RAYNOR & RAYNOR [2020] FamCA 951
[2020] FamCA 951
19 November 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the proceeding of *Raynor & Raynor*, Wilson J considered an application for leave to intervene. The dispute involved the first and second proposed intervenors seeking to become parties to the ongoing legal action.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant leave for the proposed intervenors to join the proceeding as parties. This required an assessment of the intervenors' interest in the subject matter of the litigation and whether their intervention would be just and convenient.
Wilson J granted leave for the first and second proposed intervenors to intervene and become parties to the proceeding. The Court then directed the existing parties to prepare minutes for the ongoing conduct of the proceeding by a specified date and adjourned the further hearing for mention.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to grant leave for the proposed intervenors to join the proceeding as parties. This required an assessment of the intervenors' interest in the subject matter of the litigation and whether their intervention would be just and convenient.
Wilson J granted leave for the first and second proposed intervenors to intervene and become parties to the proceeding. The Court then directed the existing parties to prepare minutes for the ongoing conduct of the proceeding by a specified date and adjourned the further hearing for mention.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
RAYNOR & RAYNOR [2020] FamCA 951
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
2
Muschinski v Dodds
[1985] HCA 78
Calverley v Green
[1984] HCA 81