Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rawan Arraf v NSW Crime Commission [2022] NSWCATAD 81 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 11 March 2022 Decision date: 11 March 2022 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: H Dixon SC, Senior Member Decision: The access application to the New South Wales Crime Commission made on 4 June 2021 is not a valid application pursuant to s 43(2) of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) and accordingly application 2021/00312080 made on 3 November 2021 is dismissed.
Catchwords: GOVERNMENT INFORMATION – access application – whether information “excluded information” – whether invalid application
Legislation Cited: Administrative Decision Review Act 1997 (NSW);
Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW); Crime Commission Act 2012 (NSW); Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Achieve Australia Ltd v Department of Family and Community Services (NSW) [2014] NSWCATAD 171
Beregi v Department of Planning, Industry and Environment [2020] NSWCATAP 185
Beregi v Department of Planning, Industry and Environment [2019] NSWCATAD 253
Christopher v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2021] NSWCATAD 256
Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration [1992] HCA 64
Coleman v Power (2004) 220 CLR 1
Coppock v Willoughby City Council [2021] NSWCATAD 166
DNM v NSW Ombudsman [2019] NSWCATAP 77
DRJ v Commissioner of Victims Rights; DRK v Commissioner of Victims Rights; DRL v Commissioner of Victims Rights; DRM v Commissioner of Victims Rights; DRN v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2019] NSWCATAD 195
Hooper v Willoughby City Council [2021] NSWCATAD 208
New South Wales Crime Commission v Hindmarch [2019] NSWSC 1801
Pertsinidis v Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District [2014] NSWCATAD 130
Texts Cited: The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
The Palermo Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Rawan Arraf (Applicant)
New South Wales Crime Commission (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Applicant (Self Represented)
Crown Solicitor (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/00312080 Publication restriction: None
Reasons for decision
Background
-
In separate jurisdictions the Applicant acts for a number of persons who are said to be victims of acts of violence committed in overseas countries during the period August 2014 and November 2014. The acts of violence are said to have been carried out by a number of persons including someone identified as “KS”, an Australian citizen.
-
By application dated 3 November 2021 the Applicant seeks to invoke the jurisdiction of the Tribunal to review a decision of the New South Wales Crime Commission (“the Respondent”) made on 8 June 2021 refusing access to 3 categories of documents sought by the Applicant by way of an application for information under the Government Information (Public Access) Act2009(NSW) (“the GIPA Act”).
-
In its decision of…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Rawan Arraf v NSW Crime Commission and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] NSWCATAD 81
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court first examined the definition of "excluded information" under the Act and the criteria for such exclusions. It found that the information sought by Arraf related to the investigation of a criminal offence and was subject to an exclusion under section 22(1)(a) of the Act, which pertains to information that could prejudice an investigation or the enforcement of any law. The court then assessed whether the application itself was invalid due to the nature of the information sought. Given that the information was indeed excluded information, the court concluded that the application was invalid under section 43(2) of the Act, which mandates that an application for access to excluded information is invalid.
Consequently, the court dismissed Arraf's application for judicial review. The court found that the application was invalid as it sought access to information that was explicitly excluded by the Act. The court's decision was based solely on the invalidity of the application due to the nature of the information sought, and no further review of the merits of the application was conducted. The orders made by the court were that the application to the NSW Crime Commission made on 4 June 2021 was not a valid application under section 43(2) of the Act, and accordingly, the application for judicial review made on 3 November 2021 was dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
The access application to the New South Wales Crime Commission made on 4 June 2021 is not a valid application pursuant to s 43(2) of the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW) and accordingly application 2021/00312080 made on 3 November 2021 is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.