Rasheed & Galliano (No 2)

Case [2024] FedCFamC2F 1236


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 2)

Rasheed & Galliano (No 2) [2024] FedCFamC2F 1236

File number(s): PAC 1825 of 2022
Judgment of: JUDGE BERTONE
Date of judgment: 9 September 2024
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Parenting – serious allegations of family violence – Father charged with serious criminal offences against Mother – Father withdraws on first day of final hearing – consideration of unacceptable risk – where the three eldest children refuse to spend time and communicate with Father – where safety of children and the Mother requires a no time order
Legislation:

Australian Passports Act 2005, s 11

Family Law Act 1975, ss 4AB, 60CA, 60CC, 60CG, 64B, 65D, 68B, 68C, 65Y, 114Q

Cases cited:

Isles & Nelissen [2022] FedCFamC1A 97

Rasheed & Galliano [2024] FedCFamC2F 992

Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon [2003] HCA 48

Division: Division 2 Family Law
Number of paragraphs: 213
Date of last submission/s: 8 July 2024
Date of hearing: 8 July 2024
Place: Brisbane
Solicitor for the Applicant: Legal Aid New South Wales
For the Respondent: No appearance for or on behalf of the Respondent
Counsel for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Mr Smith
Solicitor for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Phillip A Wilkins & Associates

ORDERS

PAC 1825 of 2022

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MS RASHEED

Applicant

AND:

MR GALLIANO

Respondent

INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE BERTONE

DATE OF ORDER:

9 SEPTEMBER 2024

THE COURT ORDERS:

1.That all previous parenting orders are hereby discharged.

2.That all outstanding Applications be dismissed.

AND THE COURT ORDERS BY CONSENT ON A FINAL BASIS:

3.That the Mother shall have sole responsibility and sole decision authority for making decisions about major long-term issues for the children W born in 2008, X born in 2010, Y born in 2014 and Z born in 2018 (‘the children’).

4.That the children shall live with the Mother.

AND THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS ON A FINAL BASIS:

5.That the children shall spend no time and have no communication with the Father.

6.That the Father and his servants shall be prohibited from removing or taking possession of the children from the Mother’s care.

7.That pursuant to section 68B of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (‘the Act’), the Father shall be and is hereby restrained by injunction from:

(a)Approaching or contacting the children by any means and from requesting, encouraging or causing any third party to approach or contact the children by any means, including on his behalf;

(b)Attempting to locate the children and/or any person with whom the children lives with or requesting, encouraging or causing any third party to do so, including on his behalf;

(c)assaulting, threatening, stalking or harassing or in any other way intimidating the children or requesting, encouraging or causing any other person to do so, including on his behalf; and

(d)Attending and/or contacting any daycare, school and/or other educational facility that parents are ordinarily permitted to attend.

8.That pursuant to section 68B of the Act, upon the expiry…

Continue reading Rasheed & Galliano (No 2)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Rasheed & Galliano (No 2) [2024] FedCFamC2F 1236
Case
[2024] FedCFamC2F 1236
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, Ms Rasheed applied for parenting orders in relation to the four children of the relationship. The Respondent, Mr Galliano, withdrew the charges against Ms Rasheed on the first day of the final hearing. The court was required to determine whether the children should spend time and communicate with the Respondent, and if there were any other orders necessary to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the children and the Mother. The court considered the serious allegations of family violence and the safety concerns raised by the children and the Mother. The three eldest children expressed their unwillingness to spend time and communicate with the Respondent, and there were concerns about the safety of the children and the Mother. The court found that it was in the best interests of the children to have no contact with the Respondent and made orders to this effect.

The court found that the safety of the children and the Mother required that the children have no contact with the Respondent. The court made a no time order, restraining the Respondent from contacting the children or the Mother, and from attempting to locate them. The court also made orders for personal protection to which a power of arrest without warrant attached. The court granted the Mother sole responsibility and sole decision authority for making decisions about major long-term issues for the children, and allowed the Mother to travel with the children both within and outside of the Commonwealth of Australia without the Respondent’s consent. The court also made orders for the Mother to be able to provide copies of the orders to relevant persons and organisations as required.

Orders

Orders of the court

PAC 1825 of 2022

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)

BETWEEN:

MS RASHEED

Applicant

AND:

MR GALLIANO

Respondent

INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER

ORDER MADE BY:

JUDGE BERTONE

DATE OF ORDER:

9 SEPTEMBER 2024

THE COURT ORDERS:

1. That all previous parenting orders are hereby discharged.

2. That all outstanding Applications be dismissed.

AND THE COURT ORDERS BY CONSENT ON A FINAL BASIS:

3. That the Mother shall have sole responsibility and sole decision authority for making decisions about major long-term issues for the children W born in 2008, X born in 2010, Y born in 2014 and Z born in 2018 (‘the children’).

4. That the children shall live with the Mother.

AND THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS ON A FINAL BASIS:

5. That the children shall spend no time and have no communication with the Father.

6. That the Father and his servants shall be prohibited from removing or taking possession of the children from the Mother’s care.

7. That pursuant to section 68B of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (‘the Act’), the Father shall be and is hereby restrained by injunction from:

(a) Approaching or contacting the children by any means and from requesting, encouraging or causing any third party to approach or contact the children by any means, including on his behalf;

(b) Attempting to locate the children and/or any person with whom the children lives with or requesting, encouraging or causing any third party to do so, including on his behalf;

(c) assaulting, threatening, stalking or harassing or in any other way intimidating the children or requesting, encouraging or causing any other person to do so, including on his behalf; and

(d) Attending and/or contacting any daycare, school and/or other educational facility that parents are ordinarily permitted to attend.

8. That pursuant to section 68B of the Act, upon the expiry of the Mother’s current New South Wales Apprehended Domestic Violence Order in late 2024, the Father shall be and is hereby restrained by injunction from:

(a) Approaching or contacting the Mother by any means and from requesting, encouraging or causing any third party to approach or contact the Mother by any means, including on his behalf;

(b) Attempting to locate the Mother and/or any person with whom the Mother lives with or requesting, encouraging or causing any third party to do so, including on his behalf; and

(c) Assaulting, threatening, stalking or harassing or in any other way intimidating the mother or requesting, encouraging or causing any other person to do so, including on his behalf.

9. That the Father shall be and is hereby restrained from making enquiries or otherwise attempting to locate the Mother’s residence, or from causing or permitting any third party to do so.

10. That Orders 7 to 9 are Orders for personal protection to which a power or arrest without warrant attached pursuant to provisions of section 68C of the Act.

11. That the Mother is permitted to apply for and/or renew an Australian passport for the children and the Father’s consent is not required.

12. That for the purpose of section 11(1)(b) of the Australian Passports Act 2005 (Cth) the children are permitted to have an Australian passport and travel internationally.

13. That the Mother shall be at liberty to travel with the children both within and outside of the Commonwealth of Australia and does not require the Father’s consent.

14. That the Mother shall have leave to provide a copy of these Orders to the children’s day care, school, before and/or after school care provider, other educational facility, GP, any other treating health care practitioner and/or other child-related organisation as required.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Part XIVB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish an account of proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.