Randwick City Council v Athens (No 3)

Case

[2004] NSWLEC 49

01/30/2004

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Randwick City Council v Athens and Anor (No 3) [2004] NSWLEC 49
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Randwick City Council

FIRST RESPONDENT
Peta Athens

SECOND RESPONDENT
Athens Holdings Pty Limited (ACN 001 166 552)
FILE NUMBER(S): 40097 of 2000
CORAM: Cowdroy J
KEY ISSUES: Contempt :- obligation to evidence - objection overruled.
LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995, s 136
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 28/01/2004; 29/01/2004; 30/01/2004
EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :
01/30/2004
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANT
Mr A. Thompson (Barrister)

SOLICITORS
Bowen & Gerathy

RESPONDENT
Mr M. Ramage QC

SOLICITORS
Levitt Robinson Solicitors and Associates



JUDGMENT:

IN THE LAND AND


ENVIRONMENT COURT


OF NEW SOUTH WALES

                          40097 of 2000

                          Cowdroy J

                          30 January 2004
Randwick City Council
                                  Applicant
      v
Peta Athens
                                  First Respondent
Athens Holding Pty Limited (ACN 001 166 552)
                              Second Respondent
Judgment [No. 3 Interlocutory]

      Introduction

1 An application has been made that the Court exclude the content of paragraph 5 of the affidavit of David Mulcahy on the basis that it may be unfairly prejudicial to the alleged contemnors.

2 The Court notes that by letter dated 14 January 2004 the solicitors for the respondents acknowledged that the affidavit of Mr David Mulcahy would be relied upon together with other affidavits. No objection was taken, nor any foreshadowed issue concerning the matter to which objection has been taken.

3 Accordingly, the Court does not consider it appropriate to accede to the request which is now made that the Court exclude it under s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995. For this reason, the application is rejected.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1