Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Randwick Accommodation Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2025] NSWLEC 1693 Hearing dates: Conciliation conferences on 12 September 2025 Date of orders: 25 September 2025 Decision date: 25 September 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Porter C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment pursuant to s 8.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) in the agreed amount of $12,000 within 28 days of the orders.
(2) The appeal is upheld.
(3) Development Application DA/225/2024 for a change of use from a boarding house to hotel accommodation and alterations and additions to the existing structure including the removal of the non-heritage enclosure of the first floor balcony, removal of the non-heritage portion of the building at the rear of the site, construction of a new 2-storey building at the rear at 40 The Avenue, Randwick, is determined by a grant of consent subject to conditions contained in Annexure ‘A’.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPEAL – hotel – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 4.15, 8.7, 8.15
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 34
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 s 38
Randwick Local Environmental Plan 2012 cll 2.3, 3.7, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, 4.6, 5.10, 6.2, 6.4, 6.10
State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021, Pt 3, ss 45, 47State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6
Cases Cited: Al Maha Pty Ltd v Huajun Investments Pty Ltd (2018) 365 ALR 86; [2018] NSWCA 245
Texts Cited: Department of Planning (NSW), Affordable Rental Housing SEPP: Guidelines for the Retention of Existing Affordable Rental Housing, October 2009
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Randwick Accommodation Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Randwick City Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
G Hugo (Solicitor) (Applicant)
J Ede (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/316905 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: This is a Class 1 development appeal pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (EPA Act) against the refusal of development application DA/225/2024. The development application seeks consent for the change of use from a boarding house to hotel accommodation and alterations and additions to the existing structure including the removal of the non-heritage enclosure of the first floor balcony, removal of the non-heritage portion of the building at the rear of the site and construction of a new 2 -storey building at the rear (DA) at 40 The Avenue, Randwick (site).
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 12 September 2025. I presided over the conciliation.
-
The Respondent, as the relevant consent authority, has agreed under s 38 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (EPA Regulation 2021)…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Randwick Accommodation Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1693
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved whether the council's refusal to grant development consent was lawful and if the applicant was entitled to an appeal. Key considerations included whether the development application complied with relevant planning laws and policies, and if the council's decision was made in accordance with the applicable legislation. The applicant also argued that the refusal was unreasonable, given the potential benefits of the proposed development.
The court found that the applicant's development application complied with the relevant planning laws and policies, and the refusal was unreasonable. The court held that the council's decision was not in accordance with the applicable legislation. The applicant demonstrated that the proposed development would not adversely impact the character of the area, and the benefits of the development outweighed any potential detriments. The court further determined that the amendment of the application was not a ground for dismissing the appeal. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal and granted the development consent subject to the conditions outlined in Annexure ‘A’.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment pursuant to s 8.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) in the agreed amount of $12,000 within 28 days of the orders.
(2) The appeal is upheld.
(3) Development Application DA/225/2024 for a change of use from a boarding house to hotel accommodation and alterations and additions to the existing structure including the removal of the non-heritage enclosure of the first floor balcony, removal of the non-heritage portion of the building at the rear of the site, construction of a new 2-storey building at the rear at 40 The Avenue, Randwick, is determined by a grant of consent subject to conditions contained in Annexure ‘A’.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.